References
- Baranowski K., Ograniczenie stosowania zasady ne bis in idem na podstawie art. 52 ust. 1 Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej. Glosa do wyroku TS z dnia 20 marca 2018 r., C-524/15, ‘Europejski Przegląd Sądowy’ 2020, no. 2, pp. 33–46.
- Bonelli M., The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, ‘Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law’ 2018, no. 3, pp. 357–373.
- Dougan M., From Velvet Glove to the Iron Fist: Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of Union Law, (in:) M. Cremona (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of EU Law, Oxford 2012, pp. 74–131.
- Gil Ibanez A.J., The Administrative Supervision and Enforcement of EC Law: Powers, Procedures and Limits, Oxford/Portland 1999.
- Hancox E., The Meaning of ‘Implementing’ EU Law under Article 51(1) of the Charter: Åkerberg Fransson, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2013, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1411–1431.
- Harding C., Models of Enforcement: Direct and Delegated Enforcement and the Emergence of a ‘Joint Action’ Model, (in:) C. Harding, B. Swart (eds.), Enforcing European Community Rules, Dartmouth 1996, pp. 22–42.
- Harding C., Swart B. (eds.), Enforcing European Community Rules, Dartmouth 1996.
- Lo Schiavo G., The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem and the Application of Criminal Sanctions: Of Scope and Restrictions, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 644–663.
- Manacorda S., The Taricco Saga: A Risk or Opportunity for European Criminal Law, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 4–11.
- Manes V., Some Lessons from the Taricco Saga, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 12–17.
- Mitsilegas V., Judicial Dialogue in Three Silences: Unpacking Taricco, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 38–42.
- Mortelmans K., General Aspects of Europeanization and Horizontalization of Enforcement, (in:) J.A.E. Vervaele (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/ London/Boston 1999, pp. 51–69.
- Piccirilli G., The ‘Taricco Saga’: The Italian Constitutional Court Continues Its European Journey, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 814–833.
- Rauchegger C., National Constitutional Rights and the Primacy of EU Law: M.A.S., ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2018, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1521–1547.
- Scholten M., EU (Shared) Law Enforcement: Who Does What and How? (in:) S. Montaldo, F. Costamagna, A. Miglio (eds.) EU Law Enforcement: The Evolution of Sanctioning Powers, London/New York 2021, pp. 7–23.
- Sicurella R., Effectiveness of EU Law and Protection of Fundamental Rights: The Questions Settled and the New Challenges after the ECJ Decision in the M.A.S. and M.B. Case (C-42/17), ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–30.
- Szwarc M., Effectiveness of EU Law and Protection of Fundamental Rights: In Search of Balance in the Context of the Ne Bis in Idem Principle, ‘Studia Prawnicze’ 2019, no. 4, pp. 37–58.
- Szwarc-Kuczer M., Kompetencje Unii Europejskiej w dziedzinie harmonizacji prawa karnego material-nego, Warsaw 2011.
- Timmerman M., Balancing Effective Criminal Sanctions with Effective Fundamental Rights Protection in Cases of VAT Fraud: Taricco, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2016, pp. 779–796.
- Vervaele J.A.E., Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/London/Boston 1999.
- Viganò F., Melloni Overruled? Considerations on the ‘Taricco II’ Judgment of the Court of Justice, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–23.