Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Law and Literature – New Tendencies Based on the Example of Science Fiction Motifs Cover

Law and Literature – New Tendencies Based on the Example of Science Fiction Motifs

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Anderson S.L., Asimov’s ‘three laws of robotics’ and machine metaethics, ‘AI & Society’ 2008, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 477–493.10.1007/s00146-007-0094-5
  2. Andruszkiewicz M., Blade Runner 2049 – wyzwania etyki przyszłości. Jak literatura kształtuje rzeczywistość i prawo, (in:) K. Zeidler (ed.), Blade Runner. O prawach quasi-człowieka, Gdańsk 2021, pp. 53–70.
  3. Andruszkiewicz M., The Heritage of Cultural Determinants of Law and Literature: Methodological Findings, ‘International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique’ 2021, vol. 34(2), pp. 611–621.10.1007/s11196-020-09743-4
  4. Aristodemou M., Law and Literature: Journey from Her to Eternity, Oxford 2000.
  5. Asimov I., Robots and Empire, New York 1985.
  6. Asimov I., Runaround, ‘Astounding Science-Fiction’, March 1942.
  7. Ben-Naftali O. and Z. Triger, The Human Conditioning: International Law and Science-Fiction, ‘Law, Culture and the Humanities’ 2018, vol. 14(1), pp. 6–44.10.1177/1743872113499215
  8. Bennett A. and N. Royle, An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory, Harlow 2005.
  9. Biet C., Judicial Fiction and Literary Fiction: The Example of the Factum, ‘Law & Literature’ 2008, no. 3, pp. 403–422.10.1525/lal.2008.20.3.403
  10. Binder G. and R. Weinberg, Literary Criticism of Law. Princeton 2000.10.1515/9781400823635
  11. Breczko A., Human Enhancement in the Context of Disability (Bioethical Considerations from the Perspective of Transhumanism), ‘Bialystok Legal Studies’ 2021 vol. 26 no. 3, pp. 95–108.10.15290/bsp.2021.26.03.05
  12. Brooks P., Narrativity of the Law, ‘Law & Literature’ 2002, no. 1, pp. 1–10.10.1525/lal.2002.14.1.1
  13. Brown Ch., Will There Be Justice? Science Fiction and The Law, Tor 2019, August 7, https://www.tor.com/2019/08/07/will-there-be-justice-science-fiction-and-the-law/.
  14. Cardoso B., Law and Literature, New York 1931.
  15. Casey C. and D. Kenny, How Liberty Dies in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: Star Wars, Democratic Decay, and Weak Executives, ‘Law and Literature’ 2021.10.2139/ssrn.3937512
  16. Contreras J.L., Science Fiction and the Law: A New Wigmorian Bibliography, ‘Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65–112.
  17. Dick P.K., Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? New York 1996.
  18. Dlaczego prawa robotyki Asimova wymagają w XXI wieku aktualizacji, https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/121860-why-asimovs-laws-of-robotics-should-be-updated-for-the-21st-century/pl.
  19. Dolin K., A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature, Cambridge 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511642418
  20. Dore F., Law’s Literature, Law’s Body: The Aversion to Linguistic Ambiguity in Law and Literature, ‘Law, Culture and Humanities’ 2006, no. 2, pp. 17–28.10.1191/1743872106lw034oa
  21. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)).
  22. Hallevy G., The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities – from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control, ‘Akron Intellectual Property Journal’ 2010, vol. 4, pp. 171–201.
  23. Hanafin P., Gearey A. and Brooker J. (eds), Law and Literature, Oxford 2004.
  24. Harraway D., A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, (in:) N. Badmington (ed.), Posthumanism, London 2000.10.1007/978-1-137-05194-3_10
  25. Jankowski W., Raport mniejszości, czyli prawie ideał kryminologii pozytywnej, (in:) J. Kamień, J. Zajadło and K. Zeidler (eds.), Prawo i literatura. Parerga, Gdańsk 2019, pp. 347–356.
  26. Lyall F., Law in Science Fiction: An Introduction, Foundation 1992, no. 55, pp. 36–57.
  27. Leslie-McCarthy S., Asimov’s Posthuman Pharisees: The Letter of the Law Versus the Spirit of the Law in Isaac Asimov’s Robot Novels, ‘Law Culture and the Humanities’ 2007, no. 3, pp. 398–415.10.1177/1743872107081427
  28. Keslovitz S., The Digital Dystopias of Black Mirror and Electric Dreams, Jefferson, North Carolina 2020
  29. Księżak P. and Wojtczak S., Prawa Asimova czyli science-fiction jako fundament nowego prawa cywilnego, ‘Forum Prawnicze’ 2020, no. 4(60), pp. 57–70.
  30. Kuisz J. and Wąsowicz M. (eds.), Prawo i literatura. Antologia, Warsaw 2019.10.31338/uw.9788323543046.pp.431-518
  31. Kuisz J. and Wąsowicz M. (eds.), Prawo i literatura. Szkice, Warsaw 2015.
  32. Lem S., Bajki robotów, Cracow 2021.
  33. Lem S., Summa technolgiae, Cracow 2019.
  34. Lem S., Microworlds. Writings on Science Fiction and Fantasy by Stanislaw Lem, Franz Rottensteiner, San Diego/New York/London 1984.
  35. Lovins C., A Ghost in the Replicant? Questions of Humanity and Technological Integration in Blade Runner and Ghost in the Shell ‘Journal of Science Fiction’ 2019, vol. 3, pp. 21–34.
  36. Materials from the symposium Law, Literature, and Science Fiction, ‘Legal Studies Forum’ 1999, vol. 23, no. 3.
  37. McCauley L., AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics, ‘Ethics and Information Technology’ 2007, vol. 9(2), pp. 153–164.10.1007/s10676-007-9138-2
  38. Raiford W., Race, Robots, and the Law, ‘New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction’ 2008, no. 93, pp. 93–113.
  39. Rockwood B.L., Law, Literature, and Science Fiction: New Possibilities, ‘Legal Studies Forum’ 1999, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 267–280.
  40. Ryan D.C., Dreams of Postmodernism and Thoughts of Mortality: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Retrospective of Blade Runner, pp.10–11, www.sensesofcinema.com/2007/feature-articles/blade-runner/.
  41. Sutin L., Divine Invasions. A Life of Philip K. Dick, New York 2005.
  42. Tranter K., Living in Technical Legality. Science Fiction and Law as Technology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 201810.3366/edinburgh/9781474420891.001.0001
  43. Travis M., Making Space: Law and Science Fiction, ‘Law and Literature’ 2011, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 241–261.10.1525/lal.2011.23.2.241
  44. Tzimas T., Legal and Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence from an International Law Perspective (Law, Governance and Technology Series, 46) 1st ed., Cham 2021.10.1007/978-3-030-78585-7
  45. Weisberg R., Wigmore and the Law and Literature Movement, ‘Law & Literature’ 2009, no. 21, pp. 129–145.10.1525/lal.2009.21.1.129
  46. Westre T., Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep and Blade Runners? Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences 2018, p. 14. https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/handle/11250/2602236.
  47. White J.B., The Legal Imagination, Boston 1979.
  48. Wigmore J.H., A List of Legal Novels, Chicago 1908.
  49. Wigmore, J.H., A List of One Hundred Legal Novels, ‘Illinois Law Review’ 1922, vol. 17, pp. 26–41.
  50. Zeidler K. and Andruszkiewicz M, Law and Law and Literature, (in:) A. Bator, J. Zajadło and M. Zirk-Sadowski (eds.), Wielka encyklopedia prawa. Tom VII Teoria i filozofia prawa. Warsaw, 2016, pp. 334–339.
  51. Zeidler K., Estetyka prawa, Gdańsk/Warsaw 2018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.04.02 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9452 | Journal ISSN: 1689-7404
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 21 - 34
Submitted on: Jun 15, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 16, 2022
Published on: Dec 29, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Marta Andruszkiewicz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.