Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Scope of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Intellectual Property Disputes: Tackling Online Copyright Infringements Cover

The Scope of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Intellectual Property Disputes: Tackling Online Copyright Infringements

By: Magdalena Knapp  
Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Eechoud, M. van, Alternatives to the Lex Protectionis as the Choice-of-Law Rule for Initial Ownership of Copyright, (in:) J. Drexl and A. Kur (eds.), Intellectual Property and Private International Law. Heading for the Future, Oxford 2005.
  2. EUIPO, Study on Dynamic Blocking Injunctions in the European Union, https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/2021_Dynamic_Blocking_Injuctions/2021_Study_on_Dynamic_Blocking_Injuctions_in_the_European_Union_FullR_en.pdf.
  3. Feraci O., Digital Rights and Jurisdiction: The European Approach to Online Defamation and IPRs Infringements, (in:) E. Carpanelli, N. Lazzerini, Use and Misuse of New Technologies. Contemporary Challenges in International and European Law, New York 2019.10.1007/978-3-030-05648-3_14
  4. Frosio G., Enforcement of European Rights on a Global Scale, (in:) E. Rosati (ed.), Handbook of European Copyright Law, London 2021.10.2139/ssrn.3798424
  5. Klafkowska-Waśniowska K., Zamieszczanie odesłań internetowych a zakres autorskich praw majątkowych, „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 2015, vol. 19.10.15290/bsp.2015.19.04
  6. Kur A. and Maunsbach U., Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights, “Oslo Law Review” 2019, vol. 6, no. 1.10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-07
  7. Lundstedt L., Putting Right Holders in the Centre: Bolagsupplysningen and Ilsjan (C-194/16): What Does It Mean for International Jurisdiction over Transborder Intellectual Property Infringement Disputes? “IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law” 2018, vol. 49.10.2139/ssrn.3227931
  8. Lundstedt L., The Newly Adopted Hague Judgments Convention: A Missed Opportunity for Intellectual Property, “IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law” 2019, vol. 50.10.1007/s40319-019-00862-5
  9. Matusiak I., Konsekwencje (braku) zmian przepisów prawa autorskiego a status prawny gier komputerowych, „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 2015, vol. 19.10.15290/bsp.2015.19.05
  10. Polčák R., Territoriality of Copyright Law, (in:) P. Szczepanik, P. Zahrádka, J. Macek, P. Stepan (eds.), Digital Peripheries. The Online Circulation of Audiovisual Content from the Small Market Perspective, New York 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-44850-9_4
  11. Świerczyński M., Intellectual Property and Private International Law: High Time for a Dedicated EU Rome IP Regulation? „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego” 2016, vol. 132.
  12. WIPO, When Private International Law Meets Intellectual Property Law: A Guide for Judges https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1053.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.01.10 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9452 | Journal ISSN: 1689-7404
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 159 - 171
Submitted on: Nov 17, 2021
Accepted on: Feb 20, 2022
Published on: Apr 5, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Magdalena Knapp, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.