Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Adoption of International Arbitration as the Preferred ADR Process in the Resolution of International Intellectual Property Disputes Cover

The Adoption of International Arbitration as the Preferred ADR Process in the Resolution of International Intellectual Property Disputes

By: David Lewis  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Abram Landau Real Estate v. Bevonna, 123 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir. 1997).
  2. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643 (1986).
  3. Bermann G. A., The ‘Gateway’ Problem in International Commercial Arbitration, “Yale Journal of International Law” 2012, vol. 1, 37, no. 1.
  4. Blackaby R.N. et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Student Edition, Oxford 2009.10.1093/law:iic/9780199557189.001.1
  5. Blanke G., Samsung Electronics offers arbitration commitment under article 9 of Regulation 1/2003, “Global Competition Litigation Review” 2014, vol. 7, no. 2.
  6. Born G.B., International Commercial Arbitration in The United States: Commentary and Materials, New York 1994.
  7. Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006).
  8. Certilman S.A., Lutsker J. E., Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes, (in:) T.D. Halket (ed.), Arbitration of Intellectual Property Disputes, Huntington, New York 2012.
  9. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 10 June 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2519, 330 U.N.T.S. 3.
  10. Cook T., Garcia A.I., Intellectual Property Arbitration, Netherlands 2010.
  11. David J.L., Harrison S., Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value From Their Intellectual Assets, Hoboken 2001.
  12. The DuPont Company’s Development of ADR Usage: From Theory to Practice, http://www.americanbar.org/publications/dispute_resolution_magazine/2014/spring/the-dupont-compans-development-of-adr-usage--from-theory-to-pra.html.
  13. Epstein J. et al., A Practical Guide to International Commercial Arbitration, Dobbs Ferry 2000.
  14. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995).
  15. Fortune Magazine Global 500 2014, http://fortune.com/global500/dupont-320/.
  16. Fox Jr. W., International Commercial Agreements: A Primer on Drafting, Negotiating, and Resolving Disputes 3rd ed., The Hague 1998.
  17. Graves J.M., Competence-Competence and Separability – American Style, (in:) S. Kröllet et al. (eds.), International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution, Netherlands 2011.
  18. Harrison S.S., Sullivan Sr.P.H., United Einstein in the Boardroom – Moving Beyond Intellectual Capital to I-Stuff, United States 2006.
  19. Li X.,Ten Misconceptions About the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, (in:) X. Li, C.M. Correa (eds.), Intellectual Property Enforcement: International Perspectives, Northampton, MA 2009.10.4337/9781848449251
  20. Lloreda, A., Exploring Alternative Dispute Resolution, (in:) L.G. Bryer et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Strategies for the 21st Century Corporation: A Shift in Strategic and Financial Management, Hoboken 2011.
  21. Lucasfilm v. Ainsworth (2011) UKSC 39, (2012) 1 AC 208, (2011) 3 WLR 487 (appeal taken from Eng.).
  22. Mascarenhas V., Using ‘Baseball Arbitration’ to Resolve FRAND Disputes, “Corporate Counsel” 2015, http://www.kslaw.com/imageserver/KSPublic/library/publication/2015articles/2–11-15_CorpCounsel_Mascarenhas.pdf.
  23. McSherry C., Who Owns Academic Work?, Cambridge, MA 2001.
  24. Miller C. et al., The Handbook of Nanotechnology, Hoboken 2005, p. 254.
  25. Moses M.L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511819216
  26. Other relevant conventions http://www.newyorkconvention.org/other-relevant-conventions.
  27. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395 (1967).
  28. Rent-a-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 130 S. Ct. 2772, (2010).
  29. Riley Mfg. Co. v. Anchor Glass Container Corp., 157 F.3d 775, 779 (10th Cir. 1998).
  30. Ryder R.D., Madhavan A., Intellectual Property and Business: The Power of Intangible Assets, United States 2014.10.4135/9789351508021
  31. Silverman A.E., Intellectual Property Law and the Venture Capital Process, “High Technology Law Journal” 1989, vol. 5, no. 1.
  32. Shaw P.D., Managing Legal and Security Risks in Computing and Communications, Oxford 1998.
  33. Shell G.R., Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Effects of Commercial Arbitration, “UCLA Law Review” 1988, vol. 35.
  34. Smit R.H., General Commentary on the WIPO Arbitration Rules, Recommended Clauses, General Provisions and the WIPO Expedited Arbitration Rules: Articles 1 to 5; Articles 39 and 40, (in:) H. Smit (ed.), WIPO Arbitration Rules: Commentary and Analyses, Huntington, New York 2009.
  35. States parties to the New York Convention, http://www.newyorkconvention.org/new-york-convention-countries/contracting-states and http://www.newyorkconvention.org/contracting-states/list-of-contracting-states.
  36. Sullivan P. H., Value-Drive Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value, United States 2000.
  37. TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 320 (1999), 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994).
  38. Troller K., Intellectual Property Disputes in Arbitration, “Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management” 2006, vol. 72.
  39. U.N. Commission on International Trade Law, Report on its 39th Session, 19 June–7 July 2006, U.N. Doc.A/61/17 (14 July 2006), http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/1985Model_arbitration_status.html.
  40. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as Approved by ICANN on 24 October 1999, https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012–02-25-en.
  41. U.S. Code > Title 9 Arbitration > CHAPTER 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS (§§ 1–16).
  42. U.S. Code > Title 9 Arbitration > CHAPTER 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS (§ 4). Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination.
  43. van den Berg A.J., The New York Convention of 1958: An Overview, pp. 6–9, http://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/0/12125884227980/new_york_convention_of_1958_overview.pdf.
  44. Waelde C. et al., Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy 3rd ed., Oxford 2013.10.1093/he/9780199671823.001.0001
  45. Wheeler M., The Art of Negotiation: How to Improvise Agreement in a Chaotic World, United States 2013.
  46. Wing J.D., International Arbitration and Mediation – The Professional’s Perspective, (in:) A. Alebekova, R. Carrow (eds.), International Arbitration and Mediation: From the Professional’s Perspective, United States 2007.
  47. WIPO Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for Intellectual Property Offices,
  48. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/specific-sectors/ipoffices/.
  49. World Intellectual Property Organization, Why Arbitration in Intellectual Property?, http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/why-is-arb.html.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.05.03 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9452 | Journal ISSN: 1689-7404
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 41 - 62
Submitted on: May 31, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2021
Published on: Dec 17, 2021
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 David Lewis, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.