Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dispute Resolution That Divides: The EU -USA Conflict on Investment -State Dispute Resolution Cover

Dispute Resolution That Divides: The EU -USA Conflict on Investment -State Dispute Resolution

By: Judit Glavanits  
Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. Bottini G., Reform of the Investor -State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal, (in:) J.E. Kalicki, A. Joubin -Bret (eds.), Reshaping the Investor -State Dispute Settlement System, BRILL, 2015, pp. 455–473, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_021.10.1163/9789004291102_021
  2. Bown Ch.P., On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement, “The Review of Economics and Statistics”, 2004, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 811–823.10.1162/0034653041811680
  3. Bussiè re M., Pé rez -Barreiro E., Straub R., Taglioni D., Protectionist responses to the crisis – global trends and implications, ECB Occasional Paper, No. 110 (2010), European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M.10.2139/ssrn.1325251
  4. Caporal, Jack: What Is Former Vice President Biden’s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic & International Studies, 12 February, 2020.
  5. Caytas J.,: From Shield to Sword: TTIP’s Lessons on Democratic Legitimacy for International Investment Arbitration,„Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems: Common Law” (Apr. 23, 2015),https://ssrn.com/abstract=2685501.
  6. De Ville F., Siles -Brü gge G., Why TTIP is a game -changer and its critics have a point, „Journal of European Public Policy”, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273.10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273
  7. Garcia -Duran P., Eliasson L.J., The Public Debate over Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and Its Underlying Assumptions,„Journal of World Trade”, 2017, Vol 51 No. 1, pp. 23–42.10.54648/TRAD2017002
  8. Gaukrodger D., Adjudicator Compensation Systems and Investor -State Dispute Settlement, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2017/05, OECD Publishing, Paris,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/c2890bd5-en.10.1787/c2890bd5-en
  9. Hallak I., Multilateral Investment Court – Overview of the reform proposals and prospects, European Parliament Research Service, PE 646.147, January 2020,https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/646147/EPRS_BRI(2020)646147_EN.pdf.
  10. Hodgson M., Campbell A., Damages and costs in investment treaty arbitration revisited, “Global Arbitration Review”, 14 December 2017,http://www.itd.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Annex-2-Allen-and-Overy-Damages-and-costs-in-investment-treaty-arbitration-revisited--December-2017.pdf.
  11. Horváthy B., Potential Impacts of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations on the EU Environmental Policy, “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies”, 2016, Vol. 57. No. 4, pp. 401–415, doi: https://doi.org/10.1556%2F2052.2016.57.4.1.10.1556/2052.2016.57.4.1
  12. ICC, Dispute Resolution 2019 Statistics, Paris, 2020.
  13. Johnson L., Sachs L., Sach J., Investor -State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law, Columbia Center of Sustainable Developement, CCSI Policy Paper, May 2015,https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D82N52TP.
  14. Jugmittag, Andre, Welfens, Paul J.J.: EU -US trade post -trump perspectives: TTIP aspects related to foreign direct investment and innovation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2020/17. pp. 259–294.10.1007/s10368-020-00459-1
  15. Kohler W., Stähler F., The economics of investor protection: ISDS versus national treatment, “Journal of International Economics”, 2019, Volume 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254.10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254
  16. Wallach L., The US Drops ISDS, “The Globalist”, 24 January, 2020, https://www.theglobalist.com/united-states-european-union-trade-isds-usmca-uncitral-mic/.
  17. McRae D., What is the future of WTO Dispute Settlement, “Journal of International Economic Law”, 2004, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3–21.10.1093/jiel/7.1.3
  18. Merrils J.G., International Dispute Settlement, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
  19. Mitchell A.D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511674556
  20. Moses M.L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, 2017.10.1017/9781316585245
  21. Rivkin, D.W., Enforceability of Arbitral Awards Based on Lex Mercatoria, “Arbitration International”, 1993, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 67–84.10.1093/arbitration/9.1.67
  22. Schreuer Ch.H. et al, The ISCID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511596896
  23. VanGrasstek C., The Trade Policy of the United States under the Trump Administration, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019/11, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60889/RSCAS_2019_11.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.3330577
  24. Yang H., The EU’s Investment Court System and Prospects for a New Multilateral Investment Dispute Settlement System (October 12, 2017), “KIEP Research Paper”, No. Policy References 17–06, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063843.10.2139/ssrn.3063843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2020.25.03.03 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9452 | Journal ISSN: 1689-7404
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 43 - 53
Submitted on: Jul 29, 2020
|
Accepted on: Aug 17, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 19, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Judit Glavanits, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.