Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Some Remarks on the Relationship between the Jus ad Bellum Regulations under the UN Charter and Customary International Law – Why Does It Matter so Much? Cover

Some Remarks on the Relationship between the Jus ad Bellum Regulations under the UN Charter and Customary International Law – Why Does It Matter so Much?

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Bernhardt R, ‘Customary International Law’ in R Bernhardt (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (1992) 901.
  2. Bowett DW, Self-defence in International Law (1958).
  3. Corten O, The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (2012).
  4. Czapliński W, ‘Reforma ONZ – zasady użycia siły zbrojnej w stosunkach międzynarodowych’ [The Reform of the UN – Principles of the Use of Force in International Relations], in J Symonides (ed), Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych – bilans i perspektywy [The United Nations – The Balance and Perspectives] (2006) 677.
  5. Delahunty RJ, ‘Paper Charter: Self-Defense and the Failure of the United Nations Collective Security System’ (2006-2007) 56 Catholic University Law Review 871.
  6. Delahunty RJ, Yoo J, ‘Great Power Security’ (2009-2010) 10 Chicago Journal of International Law 35.
  7. Dinstein Y, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (4th ed 2005).10.1017/CBO9780511841019
  8. Franck TM, ‘Who Killed Art. 2(4)? Or: The Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States’ (1970) 64 American Journal of International Law 809.10.2307/2198919
  9. Frowein JA, ‘Is Public International Law Dead?’(2003) 43 German Yearbook of International Law 10.
  10. Glennon MJ, ‘How International Rules Die’, (2005) 93 Georgetown Law Journal 939.
  11. Glennon MJ, ‘The Emerging Use-of-Force Paradigm’ (2006) 11 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 309.10.1093/jcsl/krl019
  12. Glennon MJ, ‘The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter’ (2002) 25 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 539.
  13. Glennon MJ, ‘The Rise and Fall of the U.N. Charter’s Use of Force Rules’ (2003-2004) 27 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 497.
  14. Goodwin-Gill GS, McAdam J, The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed 2007)
  15. Green JA, The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (2009).
  16. Green JA, ‘Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force’ (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law 215.
  17. Henkin L, ‘The Reports of The Death of Article 2(4) Are Greatly Exaggerated’ (1971) 65 American Journal of International Law 809.10.2307/2198975
  18. Higgins R, ‘A Just World Order Under Law. Plenary Address’ in P Rogers (ed) Themes and Theories (2009) 1292.
  19. Jasudowicz T, ‘Zakaz użycia lub groźby użycia siły „w jakikolwiek inny sposób niezgodny z celami Narodów Zjednoczonych”’ [The prohibition of the threat or use of force “against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations”] in T Jasudowicz, M Balcerzak, J Kapelańska-Pręgowska (eds) Współczesne problemy praw człowieka i międzynarodowego prawa humanitarnego [Modern Problems of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law] (2009) 115.
  20. Kowalski M, Armed Attack, Non-State Actors and a Quest for the Attribution Standard, (2010) XXX Polish Yearbook of International Law 118.
  21. Kowalski M, ‘Ius ad bellum a systemowy charakter prawa międzynarodowego [Jus ad Bellum and the Systemic Nature of International Law] in R Kwiecień (ed), Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa [The State and International Law as the System of Law (2015) 167.
  22. Kowalski M, Prawo do samoobrony jako środek zwalczania terroryzmu międzynarodowego [Right to Self-Defence as a Means of Counter-terrorism] (2013).
  23. Mik C, ‘Ius cogens we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym’ [Jus Cogens in Modern International Law] in A Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska (ed), Aksjologia współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego [Axiology of Modern International Law] (2011) 219.
  24. Randelzhofer A, ‘Article 2(4)’ in B Simma (ed), Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (2nd ed 2002) 117.
  25. Ruys T, ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (2010).10.1017/CBO9780511779527
  26. Sands Ph, Operationalizing the UN Charter Rules on the Use of Force’ in A Cassese (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (2012) 343.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691661.003.0028
  27. Stürchler N, The Threat of Force in International Law (2006).10.1017/CBO9780511494338
  28. Tams ChJ, Tzanakopoulos A, ‘Contemporary Positivism and the Jus ad bellum’ in J d’Aspremont, J Kammerhofer (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (2013).
  29. Thirlway H, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in MD Evans (ed), International Law (2003) 128.
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 126
Published on: Jan 3, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Michał Kowalski, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.