The Polish Constitutional Court from an Attitudinal and Institutional Perspective Before and After the Constitutional Crisis of 2015–2016
References
- Baum L, Judges and their Audiences. A perspective on Judicial Behaviour (Princeton University Press 2006).
- Baum L, The Puzzle of Judicial Behaviour (Michigan University Press 2005).
- Bybee KJ, All Judges Are Political, Except When They Are Not (Stanford University Press 2010).
- Carter LH, Burke Thomas F, Reason in Law (New York: Pearson Longman 2007).
- Gallo F, Intervento al seminario di studi "L'opinione dissenziente", Conference held at the Italian Constitutional Court on the 22nd of June 2009 <http://www.cortecostituzionale.it/documenti/convegni_seminari/Relazione_Gallo_opinione.pdf> (accessed March 2016).
- Geyh CG, ‘Can Rule of Law Survive Judicial Politics?’ (2012) 97 Cornell Law Review.
- Gibson James L, ‘Judges Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An interactive Model’ (1978) 72 American Political Science Review 3.10.2307/1955111
- Gillman H, Clayton CW, ‘Beyond Judicial Attitudes: Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision- Making’ in CW Clayton, H Gillman (eds) Supreme Court Decision Making. New Institutionalist Approaches (University of Chicago Press 1999).
- Holmes OW, ‘The Path of the Law’ (1987) 10 Harvard Law Review 457.
- Leiter B, ‘Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What Is the Issue?’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory.
- MacCormick N, Rhetoric and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2005).
- Mańko R, ‘Law, Politics and the Economy in Poland’s Post-Socialist Transformation: Preliminary Notes Towards an Investigation’ in Bálazs Fekete and Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz (eds), 25 Years After Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Understanding the Transition from an Internal Perspective (Peter Lang 2017).
- Mańko R, ‘“War of Courts” as a Clash of Legal Cultures: Rethinking the Conflict between the Polish Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court Over “Interpretive Judgments” in Michael Hein, Antonia Geisler and Siri Hummel (eds), Law, Politics, and the Constitution: New Perspectives from Legal and Political Theory (Peter Lang 2014).
- Mańko R, Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome (2013) 7.2 Pólemos 207.
- Maveety N, ‘The Study of Judicial Behaviour and the Discipline of Political Science’ in N Maveety (ed) The Pioneers of Judicial Behaviour (Michigan University Press 2003).
- Matczak M, ‘Poland’s Constitutional Court under PiS control descends into legal chaos’< https://www.academia.edu/31940186/Polands_Constitutional_Court_under_PiS_control_descends_into_legal_chaos> (accessed March 2017).
- Morawski L, ‘Precedens a wykładnia’ [Precedent and Interpretation] (1996) 10 Państwo i Prawo.
- Morawski L, ‘Zasada trójpodziału władzy. Trybunał Konstytucyjny i aktywizm sędziowski’ (2009) 4/93 Przegląd Sejmowy.
- O’Brien DM, Institutional Norms and Supreme Court Opinions: On Reconsidering the Rise of Individual Opinions in CW Clayton, H Gillman (ed), Supreme Court Decision Making. New Institutionalist Approaches (University of Chicago Press 1999)
- Posner R, ‘The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962 -1987’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review.
- Pritchett HC, ‘The Development of Judicial Research’ in JB Grossman, J Tanenhaus (ed) Frontiers of Judicial Research (Wiley 1969).
- Raffaeli R, Dissenting opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member States, European Parliament Policy Department C Study, PE 462.470 (European Parliament 2012).
- Ross L, Nisbett R, The Person and Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill New York 1991).
- Schubert G, Judicial Behaviour: A reader in Theory and Research (Rand McNally & Company Chicago 1964).Frontiers of Judicial Research (Wiley 1969).
- Segal JA, Spaeth HJ, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model
- (Cambridge University Press 1993).
- Sulikowski A, ‘Government of Judges and Neoliberal Ideology’ in
- Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel and Adam Sulikowski (eds), Law and Critique
- in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present (Counterpress
- 2016).
- Sulikowski A, ‘Między tekstem, rozumem i polityką. Modernistyczne fundamenty wykładni konstytucji i ich praktyczne implikacje’ in Przemysław Kaczmarek (ed), Lokalny a uniwersalny charakter interpretacji prawniczej (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2009).
- Sulikowski A, ‘Trybunał Konstytucyjny a polityczność. O konsekwencjach upadku pewnego mitu’ [Constitutional Court and the Political: On the Consequences of Dispelling a Certain Myth] (2016) 4 Państwo i Prawo.
- Tushnet M, The United States: Eclecticism in the Service of Pragmatism, in J Goldsworthy (ed) Constitutional Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2006).
- Venkateswara B Rao, Crisis in Indian Judiciary (Michigan University Press 2001).
- Waldron J, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999).
- Walker TG, Epstein L, Dixon WJ, ‘On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court’ (1988) 50 Journal Of Politics.10.2307/2131799
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2084-1264
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 107
Published on: Apr 28, 2018
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2018 Konrad Kobyliński, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.