Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Model to Assess the Implementation of Technical Conditions Defined in Annex IV of Marpol Convention 73/78: The Case of the Baltic Sea Port of Klaipeda Cover

The Model to Assess the Implementation of Technical Conditions Defined in Annex IV of Marpol Convention 73/78: The Case of the Baltic Sea Port of Klaipeda

Open Access
|Nov 2016

References

  1. 1. HELCOM recommendation 11/10 Guidelines for capacity calculation of sewage system on board passenger ships (1990) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.
  2. 2. HELCOM overview on port reception facilities for sewage in the Baltic Sea area and related trends in passenger traffic (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.
  3. 3. Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78 convention. HELCOM: Interim guidance on technical and operational aspects of delivery of sewage by passenger ships to port reception facilities (2013) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.
  4. 4. Chin-Shan, Lu; Wen-Hong, Liu; Wooldridge Ch. (2014) Maritime environmental governance and green shipping. Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 131–133.
  5. 5. Demand study port infrastructure (2013) Project CLEANSHIP report. (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping, funded by Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013).
  6. 6. Everett, S.; Pettitt, T. (2006) Effective corporatization of ports is a function of effective legislation: legal issues in the existing paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 33(3): 219–232.10.1080/03088830600783137
  7. 7. Homsombat, W.; Yip, T.L.; Yang, H.; Fu, X. (2013) Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 451–466.10.1080/03088839.2013.797118
  8. 8. Julian, M. (2000) MARPOL 73/78: the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. Maritime Studies 2000(113): 16–23.10.1080/07266472.2000.10878605
  9. 9. Klopott, M. (2013) Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 439–450.10.1080/03088839.2013.798440
  10. 10. Luo, M.; Yip, T.L. (2013) Ports and the environment. Maritime Policy & Management 40(5): 401–403.10.1080/03088839.2013.797122
  11. 11. Mattson, G. (2006) MARPOL 73/78 and Annex I: An Assessment of its Effectiveness. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 9(2): 175–194.10.1080/13880290600728195
  12. 12. Moon, D.S.-H.; Woo, J.K. (2014) The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management 41(5): 444–461.10.1080/03088839.2014.931607
  13. 13. Panasiuk, I.; Lebedevas, S. (2014) The assessment of the possibilities for the Lithuanian fleet to comply with new environmental requirements. Transport 29(1): 50–58.10.3846/16484142.2014.896828
  14. 14. Project CLEANSHIP (Clean Baltic Sea Shipping) report DEMAND STUDY PORT INFRASTRUCTURE, funded under Baltic Sea Programme 2007-2013.
  15. 15. Venus Lun, Y.H.; Lai K-H.; Christina W.Y.; Cheng T.C.E. (2014) Green shipping practices and firm performance. Journal: Maritime Policy & Management 41(2): 134–148.
  16. 16. Zondag, B.; Bucci, P.; Gützkow, P.; de Jong, G. (2010) Port competition modelling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics. Maritime Policy & Management 37(3): 179–194.10.1080/03088831003700579
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2016-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Language: English
Page range: 335 - 349
Published on: Nov 23, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Andrius Jarzemskis, Ilona Jarzemskiene, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.