Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Comparison of Alternative Ordered Response Models for Analysing User Satisfaction with Transport Services in Turkey Cover

A Comparison of Alternative Ordered Response Models for Analysing User Satisfaction with Transport Services in Turkey

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 17 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Feb 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Al-Atawi, A. and Saleh, W. (2014) Travel behaviour in Saudi Arabia and the role of social factors., 29(3), 269-277. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.913199
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Beirão, G. and Sarfield Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study., 14(6), 478-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Borooah, V. K. (2002). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing probability in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression., 46(4), 1171-1178. DOI: 10.2307/2532457
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Cascetta, E. and Cartenì, A. (2014) A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: Theory and a case study., 8(1), 84-106. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.758532
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Celik, E., Aydin, N. and Taskin Gumus, A. (2014) A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey., 36, 283-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Celik, E., Bilisik, O. N., Erdogan, M., Taskin Gumus, A. and Baracli, H. (2013) An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul., 58, 28-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Cirillo, C., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) On the asymmetric user perception of transit service quality., 5(4), 216-232. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2010.494231
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Cirit, F. (2014) Sustainable urban transport policies and comparison of mass transit systems, Planning expertise thesis, General Directorate of Economic sectors and Coordination, Turkish Ministry of Development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A. and Cecín, P. (2010) Modelling user perception of bus transit quality., 17(6), 388-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.006
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. De Oña, R., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) Key factors affecting rail service quality in the Northern Italy: a decision tree approach., 29(1), 75-83. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.898216
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Diana, M. (2012) Measuring the satisfaction of multimodal travelers for local transit services in different urban context., 46(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.018
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Dölarslan, E. S. (2014) Assessing the effects of satisfaction and value on customer loyalty behaviors in service environments: High-speed railway in Turkey as a case study., 37(8), 706-727. DOI: .1108/MRR-06-2013-0152
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit., 10(3), 21-34. Retrieved from
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view., 18(1), 172-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Feng, C. M. and Hsieh, C. H. (2009) Implications of transport diversity for quality of life., 135(1), 13-18. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13)
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Fu, V. (1998). Estimating generalized ordered logit models., 44, 27-30., Vol. 8, College Station, Tex.: Stata Press, 160-164. Retrieved from
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Filipović, S., Tica, S., Živanović, P. and Milovanović, B. (2009) Comparative analysis of the basic features of the expected and perceived quality of mass passenger public transport service in Belgrade., 24(4), 265-273. DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-273
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Garrido, C., de Oña, R. and de Oña, J. (2014) Neural networks for analyzing service quality in public transportation., 41(15), 6830-6838. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Grujičić, D., Ivanović, I., Jović, J. and Đorić, V. (2014). Customer perception of service quality in public transport., 29(3), 285-295. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.951685
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Gulhan, G., Ceylan, H., Baskan, O. and Ceylan, H. (2014) Using potential accessibility measure for urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey.–, 26(2), 129-137. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v26i2.1238
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Fiorio, C. V., Florio, M. and Perucca, G. (2013) User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: Evidence from European cities., 29, 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Haldenbilen, S. (2003). Evaluation of sustainable transport indicators for Turkey based on genetic algorithm approach, PhD thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Pamukkale University, Denizli (in Turkish).
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Haldenbilen, S. and Ceylan, H. (2005) Transport demand management in Turkey: A genetic algorithm approach., 28(6), 403-426. DOI: 10.1080/03081060500515507
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S. and Sharma, P. (2014) Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi., 24, 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Kroesen, M. (2014). Modeling the behavioral determinants of travel behavior: An application of latent transition analysis., 65, 56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.010
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Lai, W. T. and Chen, C. F. (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passenger–The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement., 18(2), 318-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Litman, T. (2011). Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Litman, T. (2014). Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Long, J. S. and Freese, J. 2001.. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. May, A. D. (2013) Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges., 7(3), 170-185. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.710136
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Mokonyama, M. and Venter, C. (2013) Incorporation of customer satisfaction in public transport contracts – A preliminary analysis., 39(1), 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.024
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Pantouvakis, A. and Lymperopoulos, K. (2008) Customer satisfaction and loyalty in the eyes of new and repeat customers., 18(6), 623-643. DOI: 10.1108/09604520810920103
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J. and White, P. (2006) The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership., 13(4), 295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. (2000). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Quddus, M. A., Wang, C. and Ison, S. G. (2010) Road traffic congestion and crash severity: Econometric analysis using ordered response models., 136(5), 424-435. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000044
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T. and Hartig, T. (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review., 25, 119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Román, C., Martín, J. C. and Espino, R. (2014) Using stated preferences to analyze the service quality of public transport., 8(1), 28-46. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.758460
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Shay, E. and Khattak, A. J. (2010) Toward sustainable transport: Conventional and disruptive approaches in the US context., 4(1), 14-40. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.758523
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Stathopoulos, A. and Marcucci, E. (2014) De gustibus disputandum est: Non-linearity in public transportation service quality evaluation., 8(1), 47-68. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.758523
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Steg, L. and Gifford, R. (2005) Sustainable transportation and quality of life., 13(1), 59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.003
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D. and El-Geneidy, A. (2014) The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes., 26, 160-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Too, L. and Earl, G. (2010) Public transport service quality and sustainable development: a community stakeholder perspective., 18(1), 51-61. DOI: 10.1002/sd.412
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Tyrinopoulos, Y. and Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications,, 15(4), 260-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014a). Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014b). Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Turkish Ministry of Development. (2012). Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Turkish Ministry of Transport. (2010).. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013a). Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013b). Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. TurkStat. (2012). Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 52. TurkStat. (2013). Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 53. TurkStat. (2014a). Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish)
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 54. TurkStat. (2014b). Ankara: Turkey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G. and Mannering, F. L. (2003). New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. .
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables., 6(1), 58-82. Retrieved from
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Williams, R. (2010) Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm,, 10(4), 540-567. Retrieved from
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 54
Published on: Feb 22, 2016
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
satisfaction,
ordered logit model,
generalized ordered logit model,
heterogeneous choice model,
partial constrained generalized ordered logit model,
Turkey
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2016 Ali Kemal Çelik, Ötüken Senger, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 17 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Previous article
Next article