Using Airborne Lidar for Detection and Morphologic Analysis of Waterbodies Obscured by the Forest Canopy

Roman, Anamaria; Ursu, Tudor-Mihai; Fărcaş, Sorina; Lăzărescu, Vlad-Andrei; Opreanu, Coriolan Horaţiu

doi:10.1515/trser-2015-0044

Abstract

The goal of this study was to map watercourses, watersheds, and small wetland features that are completely obscured by the forest canopy using airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) within the archaeological site from Porolissum. This technology was used to generate a bare-earth Digital Terrain Model (DTM) with 0.5 m spatial resolution in order to map small depressions and concavities across 10 km² of forested landscape. Although further research is needed to determine the ecological, geological, and archaeological significance of the mapped waterbodies, the general methodology represents important progress in the rapid and accurate detection of wetland habitats in forested landscapes.

References

1. Adam E., Mutanga O. and Rugege D., 2010 - Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing for identification and mapping of wetland vegetation: a review, Wetlands Ecology and Management, 18, 281-296.10.1007/s11273-009-9169-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Ayhan N. G., Seyrek K. and Sargın A. H., 2012 - Application of Geographic Information Systems in hydrology and water resources management, ISLEM Group of Companies, Ankara, Turkey.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Bilaşco Ş., 2008 - Implementarea G.I.S. în modelarea viiturilor de versant, Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă, Cluj-Napoca, România. (in Romanian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Curtean-Bănăduc A., Schneider-Binder E. and Bănăduc D., 2014 ‒ The importance of the riverine ligneous vegetation for the Danube Basin lotic ecosystems, in Cianfaglione K. (ed.), L’importanza degli Alberi e del Bosco. Cultura, scienza e coscienza del territorio, Edit. Temi, Trento, Italia, ISBN: 978-88-973772-63-9, I-II, 187-210.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Dale V. H., 1997 - The relationship between land-use change and climate change, Ecological Applications, 7, 753-769.10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0753:TRBLUC]2.0.CO;2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Dronova I., 2015 - Object-based image analysis in wetland research: a review, Remote Sensing, 7, 6380-6413.10.3390/rs70506380
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Frazier P. S. and Page K. J., 2000 - Water body detection and delineation with Landsat TM data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, 1461-1467.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Gallant A., 2015 - The challenges of remote monitoring of wetlands, Remote Sensing, 7, 10938-10950.10.3390/rs70810938
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Grindean R., Tanţău I., Fărcaş S. and Panait A., 2014 - Middle to Late Holocene vegetation shifts in the NW Transylvanian lowlands (Romania), Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Geologia, 59, 29-37.10.5038/1937-8602.59.1.2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Guisan A., Weiss S. B. and Weiss A. D., 1999 - GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution, Plant Ecology, 143, 107-122.10.1023/A:1009841519580
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Hudak A. T., Evans J. S. and Stuart A. M., 2009 - LiDAR utility for natural resource managers, Remote Sensing, 1, 934-951.10.3390/rs1040934
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Jenness J., Brost B. and Beier P., 2010 - Land Facet Corridor Designer, available at: www.jannessent.com/downloads/LandFacetCorredor.zip, (accessed June 24, 2015).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Jones K. B., Heggem D. T., Wade T. G., Neale A. C., Ebert D. W., Nash M. S., Mehaffey M. H., Hermann K. A., Selle A. R., Augustine S., Goodman I. A., Pedersen J., Bolgrien D., Viger J. M., Chiang D., Lin C. J., Zhong Y., Baker J. and Van Remortel R. D., 2000 - Assessing landscape conditions relative to water resources in the Western United States: A strategic approach, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64, 227-245.10.1007/978-94-011-4343-1_19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Karadağ A. A., 2013 - Use of watersheds boundaries in the landscape planning, in Özyavuz M. (ed.), Advances in Landscape Architecture, InTech.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Klemas V., 2012 - Airborne remote sensing of coastal features and processes: an overview, Journal of Coastal Research, 29, 239-255.10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00107.1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Lyon J. G., 2003 - GIS for water resources and watershed management, Taylor and Francis, New York.10.4324/9780203217917
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Macedo D. R., Hughes R. M., Ligeiro R., Ferreira W. R., Castro M. A., Junqueira N. T., Oliveira D. R., Firmiano K. R., Kaufmann P. R., Pompeu P. S. and Callisto M., 2014 - The relative influence of catchment and site variables on fish and macroinvertebrate richness in cerrado biome streams, Landscape Ecology, 29, 1001-1016.10.1007/s10980-014-0036-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Maidment D. R., 2002 - Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources, ESRI Press, Redlands, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Mervade V., 2012 - Watershed and stream network delineation using ArcHydro Tools, University of Purdue, School of Civil Engineering, Printed Lecture Note, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Moffett K. B. and Gorelick S. M., 2013 - Distinguishing wetland vegetation and channel features with object-based image segmentation, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 1332-1354.10.1080/01431161.2012.718463
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Mouton A., 2005 - Generating stream maps using LiDAR derived Digital Elevation Models and 10 m USGS DEM, Master of Science Thesis, University of Washington, Forest Resources Department, Washington, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. O’Keefe T. C., Elliott S. R. and Naiman R. J., 2012 - Introduction to Watershed Ecology, Printed Lecture Note, University of Washington, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Opreanu C. H. and Lăzărescu V. A., 2012 - Seeing the Unseen. Landscape archaeology on the northern frontier of the Roman Empire at Porolissvm (Romania), Ephemeris Napocensis, 22, 356-366.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Opreanu C. H., Lăzărescu V. A. and Ştefan D., 2013 - Noi Cercetări la Porolissum, Analele Banatului Arheologie-Istorie, XXI, 83-106. (in Romanian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Opreanu C. H., Lăzărescu V. A., Roman A., Ursu T. M. and Fărcaş S., 2014 - New light on a Roman Hill-Fort: LIDAR survey in the forested landscape from Porolissvm, Ephemeris Napocensis, XXIV/2014, 71-86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Patience N. and Klemas V. V., 1993 - Wetland functional health assessment using Remote Sensing and other techniques: literature search, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFSSEFSC, 319.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Roman A., Ursu T. M., Lăzărescu V. A., Opreanu C. H. and Fărcaş S., 2015 - Visualization models of ALS-derived DTM promote the recovery of unknown archaeological remains buried beneath the forests of Transylvania, Manuscript.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Roman A., Ursu T. M., Fărcaş S., Lăzărescu V. A. and Opreanu C. H., 2014 - Perspectives: Remotely Sensing the Buried Past of Present Vegetation, in Pfeifer N. and Zlinszky A., (eds), Remote Sensing and GIS for Habitat Quality Monitoring, 108-112, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Selman P., 2006 - Planning at the Landscape Scale, Rutledge Publisher, New York, USA.10.4324/9780203696903
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Silva T. S. F., Costa M. P. F., Melack J. M. and Novo E. M. L. M., 2008 - Remote sensing of aquatic vegetation: Theory and applications, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140, 131-145.10.1007/s10661-007-9855-317593532
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Sofia G., Fontana G. D. and Tarolli P., 2014 - High-resolution topography and anthropogenic feature extraction: testing geomorphometric parameters in floodplains, Hydrological Process, 28, 2046-2061.10.1002/hyp.9727
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Tarolli P., 2014 - High-resolution topography for understanding Earth surface processes: opportunities and challenges, Geomorphology, 216, 295-312.10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Uzun O. and Gultekin P., 2011 - Process analysis in landscape planning, the example of Sakarya/Kocaali, Turkey, Scientific Research and Essays, 6, 313-331.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Weiss A., 2001 ‒ Topographic Position and Landforms Analysis, ESRI User Conference, poster presentation, San Diego, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Weishampel J. F., Hightower J. N., Chase A. F., Chase D. Z. and Patrick R. A., 2011 - Detection and morphologic analysis of potential below-canopy cave openings in the karst landscape around the Maya polity of Caracol using airborne LiDAR, Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 73, 187-196.10.4311/2010EX0179R1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Wilson T., Sleeter B., Sleeter R. and Soulard C., 2014 - Land-use threats and protected areas: a scenario-based, landscape level approach, Land, 3, 362-389.10.3390/land3020362
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. ***, 1956 - Harta topografică a României, foaia: L-34-35-A-d, scara 1:25,000, R. S. România, Direcţia Topografică Militară, MApN Bucureşti, România. (in Romanian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. ***, 1992 - Atlasul cadastrului apelor din România, I și II, AQUAPROIECT, IGFCOT, Bucureşti, România. (in Romanian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. ***, 2001 - ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. *** geo-spatial.org, http://earth.unibuc.ro/download/romania-seturi-vectoriale.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Using Airborne Lidar for Detection and Morphologic Analysis of Waterbodies Obscured by the Forest Canopy

Abstract

Paradigm

My account