Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Assessment of Community Interest Fish Species from Protected Area Rosci0229 Cover

The Assessment of Community Interest Fish Species from Protected Area Rosci0229

Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research
Volume 16 (2014): Issue 1 (May 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2015
References

References

  1. 1. Bănărescu P., 1964 ‒ Pisces: Osteichthys (Peşti Ganoizi şi Osoşi), Editura R.P.R. Academy, Bucharest, 13, 962. (in Romanian)
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Bănărescu P., 1968 ‒ Lista revizuită a peștilor din România, Buletinul Institutului de Cercetări și Proiectări Piscicole, XXVII, 3, 53-61. (in Romanian)
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Bănărescu P. and Bănăduc D., 2007 ‒ Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) fish species (Osteichthyes) on the Romanian territory, Acta Ichtiologica Romanica, II, 43-78.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Cantarello E. and Newton A., 2008 ‒ Towards cost-effective indicators to maintain Natura 2000 sites in favourable conservation status. Preliminary results from Cansiglio and New Forest, Forest, 1, 75-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Charles S., Subtil F., Kielbassa J. and Pont D., 2008 ‒ An individual-based model to describe a bullhead population dynamics including temperature variations, Ecological modelling, 215, 377-392.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Chaumota A., Milionia N., Abdolib A., Pont D. and Charles S., 2006 ‒ First step of a modelling approach to evaluate spatial heterogeneity in a fish (Cottus gobio) population dynamics, Ecological modelling, 197, 263-273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Cowx I. G. and Welcomme R. L., 1998 ‒ Rehabilitation of Rivers for Fish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Curtean-Bănăduc A. and Florescu F. (eds), 2007 ‒ Romanian NATURA 2000 NGO Coalition contribution for the SCIs designation, Editura Alma Mater Sibiu, ISBN 978-973-632-402-4, 211.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Fischer S. and Kummer H., 2000 ‒ Effects of residual flow and habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream, Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 305-317.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Fish base, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Florea L., 2011 ‒ The distribution of the conservative fish species in the Natura 2000 network from Romania, Studii şi cercetări ştiinṭifice, Seria: Biologie, XXI, Editura Alma-Mater, Bacău, ISSN 1224-919X, 1-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Fontaine B., Bouchet P., Van Achterberg K., Alonso-Zarazaga M. A., Araujo R., Asche M., Aspöck U., Audiso P., Aukema B., Bailly N., Balsamo M., Bank R. A., Barnard P., Belfiore C., Bogdanowicz W., Bongers T., Boxshall G., Burckhardt D., Camicas J.-L., Chylarecki P., Crucitti P., Deharveng L., Dubois A., Enghoff H., Faubel A., Fochetti R., Gargominy O., Gibson D., Gibson R., López M. S. G., Goujet D., Harvey M. S., Heller K.-G., Van Helsdingen P., Hoch H., De Jong H., De Jong Y., Karsholt O., Los W., Lundqvist L., Magowski W., Manconi R., Martens J., Massard J. A., Massard-Geimer G., Mcinnes S. J., Mendes L. F., Mey E., Michelsen V., Minelli A., Nielsen C., Nafría J. M. N., Van Nieukerken E. J., Noyes J., Pape T., Pohl H., De Prins W., Ramos M., Ricci C., Roselaar C., Rota E., Schmidt-Rhaesa A., Segers H., Strassen R. Z., Szeptycki A., Thibaud J.-M., Thomas A., Timm T., Van Tol J., Vervoort W. and Willmann R., 2007 - The European Union’s 2010 target: putting rare species in focus, Biological Conservation, 139, 167-185.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Gaston K. J., Jackson S. E., Nagy A., Cantu-Salazar L. and Johnson M., 2008 ‒ Protected areas in Europe - principle and practice, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134, 97-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Gosselin M., Petts G. E. and Maddock I. P., 2010 ‒ Mesohabitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio), Hydrobiologia, 652.1 , 299-310.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Hanfling B. and Brandl R., 1998 ‒ Genetic variability, population size and isolation of distinct populations in the freshwater fish Cottus gobio L, Molecular Ecology, 7, 1625-1632.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Hanfling B. and Weetman D., 2006 ‒ Concordant Genetic Estimators of Migration Reveal Anthropogenically Enhanced Source-Sink Population Structure in the River Sculpin, Cottus gobio, Genetics, 1487-1501.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Iftime A., 2004 ‒ Preliminary data on the distribution of two twin species of the genus Barbus (Pisces: Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in southern Romania, Travaux du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”, București, XLVlI, 263-268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Iojă C. I., Pătroescu M., Rozylowicz L., PopescuV. D. and Vergheleţ M., 2010 ‒ The efficacy of Romania’s protected areas network in conserving biodiversity, Biological Conservation, 143, 2468-2476.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Knaepkens G., Bruyndoncx L., Bervoets L. and Eens M., 2002a ‒ The presence of artificial stones predicts the occurrence of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio) in a regulated lowland river in Flanders (Belgium), Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 11, 203-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Knaepkens G., Knapen D., Bervoets L., Hanfling B., Verheyen E. and Eens M., 2002b ‒ Genetic diversity and condition factor: a significant relationship in Flemish but not in German populations of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio L.), Heredity, 89, 280-287.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Knaepkens G., Bervoetsb L., Verheyenc E. and Eens M., 2004 ‒ Relationship between population size and genetic diversity in endangered populations of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio): implications for conservation, Biological Conservation, 115, 403-410.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Kotlik P., Tsigenopoulos C., Rab P.and Berrebi P., 2002 ‒ Two new Barbus species from the Danube River basin, with redescription of B. petenyi (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Folia zoologica, 51, 3, 227-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Legalle M., Santoul F., Figuerola J., Mastrorillo S. and Cereghino R., 2005 ‒ Factors influencing the spatial distribution patterns of the bullhead (Cottus gobio L., Teleostei Cottidae): a multiscale study, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1319-1334.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Maiorano L., Falcucci A. and Boitani L., 2008 ‒ Size-dependent resistance of protected areas to land-use change, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 1297-1304.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Margules C. R. and Pressey R. L., 2000 ‒ Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 243-253.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Mehtälä J. and Vuorisalo T., 2007 ‒ Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: Favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success, European Environment, 17, 363-375.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Nalbant T., 2003 ‒ Checklist of the Fishes of Romania, Part One: Fresh and Saltwater Fishes, Research Studies and Biology, 8, 122-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Nielsen S. E., Bayne E. M., Schieck J., Herbers J. and Boutin S., 2007 ‒ A new method to estimate species and biodiversity intactness using empirically derived reference conditions, Biological Conservation, 137, 403-414.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Pont D., Hugueny B. and Oberdorff T., 2005 ‒ Modelling habitat requirement of European fishes: do species have similar responses to local and regional environmental constraints, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 1, 163-173.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Pullin A. S., Baldi A., Can O. E., Dieterich M., Kati V., Livoreil B., Lovei G., Mihok B., Nevin O., Selva N. and Sousa-Pinto I., 2009 ‒ Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science, Conservation Biology, 23, 818-824.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Sax D. F. and Gaines S. D., 2008 ‒ Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 11490-11497.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Seeuws P., Meire P. and Verheyen R. F., 2005 ‒ Microhabitat use and preferences of the endangered Cottus gobio in the River Voer, Belgium, Journal of Fish Biology, 67, 4 , 897-909.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Thuiller W., Lavorel S., Araújo M. B., Sykes M. T. and Prentice I. L., 2005 ‒ Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 8245-8250.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Utzinger J., Roth C. and Peter A., 1998 ‒ Effects of environmental parameters on the distribution of bullhead (Cottus gobio) with particular consideration of the effects of obstructions, Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 882-892.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Vlach P., Dusek J. and Moravec P., 2005 ‒ Fish assemblage structure, habitat and microhabitat preference of five fish species in a small stream, Folia Zoologica, 54, 4, 421-431.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Anonymous, 2009 ‒ Natura 2000 Barometer - Update November 2009, Natura 2000 European Commission Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 27, 8-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2006 ‒ Progress towards halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010, EEA report, 5/2006, Luxembourg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. MEF/NAE (Ministry of Environment and Forest/National Agency of Environment), 2009 ‒ Nature conservation and biodiversity, biosafety, National environmental raport, 160-218.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. MESD (Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development), 2007 ‒ OM 1964 - The constitute of the natural protected area of Community importance as part integral to the European ecological network Natura 2000 Romanian, 1-1315.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. NARW (National Administration “Romanian Waters”, 2009 ‒ Management Plan River of space - Ialomița Buzău,10-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. http://www.rowater.ro/dabuzau/Planul% Planul de Management al Spațiului Hidrografic Buzău, pdf (accessed at 16.07.2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2344-3219 | Journal ISSN: 1841-7051
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 96
Published on: Sep 8, 2015
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Siriu,
protected area,
Cottus gobio,
Barbus petenyi,
conservation status.
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2015 Luiza Florea, Sorin Dorin Strătilă, Mioara Costache, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 16 (2014): Issue 1 (May 2014)
Previous article
Next article