Measuring methods of the corporate competitiveness, and those weaknesses

Tunde Orsolya Nagy; Eva Darabos; Istvan Labas

doi:10.1515/sues-2016-0004

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Measuring methods of the corporate competitiveness, and those weaknesses

Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series

Volume 26 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

By: Tunde Orsolya Nagy, Eva Darabos and Istvan Labas

Open Access

|Mar 2016

Abstract

This treatise was carried out with the aim of giving the reader an overview of different conceptual approaches of the competitiveness. It particularly deals with the competitiveness according to the “practical” approach, “environmental/system” approach, “capital reorganisation” approach and with the widely accepted closed definitions of competitiveness. To determine the components of competitiveness according to different aspects, to assess some empirical examinations regarding the analysis of the aforementioned aspects as well as to present the results of an own primer research are also important parts of the treatise.

References

1. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 113-124.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-120.10.1177/014920639101700108
Search in Google Scholar
3. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press. Cambridge, p.490
Search in Google Scholar
4. Chikan, A. (2006). A vallalati versenykepesseg merese. Penzugyi Szemle, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 42-54.
Search in Google Scholar
5. Czako, E. (2005). Versenykepessegi programok nehany tanulsaga a kormanyzati szfera szamara – az Ir Versenykepessegi Tanacs es a Lisszaboni Strategia, Versenyben a Vilaggal 2004 – 2006. 11. sz. műhelytanulmany. Versenykepesseg Kutato Kozpont. Budapest, p. 34
Search in Google Scholar
6. Csaba L. (2008). Versenykepesseg – hitek es balhitek. Debreceni Szemle, vol.16, no. 2, pp.162-173.
Search in Google Scholar
7. Csorba, L. (2009). Vazlat a verseny es versenykepesseg fogalmi tisztazasahoz. Kezirat, Kutatasi forum 2009. junius 18-20. Debreceni Egyetem, Kozgazdasagtudomanyi Doktori Iskola.
Search in Google Scholar
8. Horvath, Gy. (2001). A magyar regiok es telepulesek versenykepessege az europai gazdasagi tersegben. Ter es Tarsadalom, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203-231.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Hovanyi, G. (1999). A vallalati versenykepesseg makrogazdasagi es globalis hattere – Michael Porter ket modelljenek tovabbfejlesztese. Kozgazdasagi Szemle, vol.46, no. 11, pp. 1013-1029.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Hunyadi, L., Vita, L. (2008). Statisztika 1. Aula. Budapest, p. 348
Search in Google Scholar
11. Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. Prentice-Hall. New Jersey, p. 788
Search in Google Scholar
12. Lengyel, I. (1999). Regiok versenykepessege (A tersegek gazdasagfejlesztesenek főbb kozgazdasagi fogalmai, alapgondolatai, tenyezői az EU-ban). Kezirat. JATE Gazdasagtudomanyi Kar. Szeged, p. 66
Search in Google Scholar
13. Meyer-Stamer J. (2008). Systematic Competitiveness and Local Economic Development, Retrieved from: http://www.meyer-stamer.de/2008/Systemic+LED_SouthAfrica.pdf
Search in Google Scholar
14. Nelson, R. (1992). Recent Writing on competitiveness: Boxing the compass. California Management Review, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 127-137.10.2307/41166697
Search in Google Scholar
15. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 137-145.
Search in Google Scholar
16. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no. 6, pp.61-78.
Search in Google Scholar
17. Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, p. 320
Search in Google Scholar
18. Porter, M. E., Schwab, K. (2008). The global competitiveness report 2008-2009. World Economic Forum Geneva, p. 500
Search in Google Scholar
19. Schatzl, L. (1993). Wirtschaftsgeographie der Europaischen Gemeinschaft. Schoningh Verlag. Stuttgart, p. 224
Search in Google Scholar
20. Szerb, L. (2010). A magyar mikro-, kis- es kozepvallalatok versenykepessegenek vizsgalata. Vezetestudomany, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 20-35.
Search in Google Scholar
21. Torok, A. (1999). A versenykepesseg egyes jogi es szabalyozasi feltetelei Magyarorszagon. Kozgazdasagi Szemle, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1066-1084.
Search in Google Scholar

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2016-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2285-3065 | Journal ISSN: 1584-2339

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 40 - 57

Submitted on: Oct 1, 2015

Accepted on: Feb 1, 2016

Published on: Mar 17, 2016

Published by: Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

corporate competitiveness,

SME sector,

competitiveness measurement

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Political economics,

Economic policy,

Business management,

Financial reporting, group accounting, accounting and balancing,

Marketing, sales, customer relations,

Industries,

Banks, financial service provider, insurers

© 2016 Tunde Orsolya Nagy, Eva Darabos, Istvan Labas, published by Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 26 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)