Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Specification Predication and the derivation of copular to-clauses in Polish Cover

On Specification Predication and the derivation of copular to-clauses in Polish

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4). 238–266.
  2. Armstrong, Lilias E. & Ida C. Ward. 1926. A handbook of English intonation. Cambridge: Heffer.
  3. Balazs, Julie Elizabeth. 2012. The syntax of small clauses. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Cornell University.
  4. Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Bondaruk, Anna. 2013. Copular clauses in English and Polish: Structure, derivation, and interpretation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  6. Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 101–114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
  7. Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas E. Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories (Studies in Generative Grammar 112), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 179-242.
  8. Bošković, Željko & Jon Gajewski. 2011. Semantic correlates of the NP/DP parameter. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Cornell University, 121–134. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
  9. Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591–656.
  10. Bowers, John. 2003. Predication. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1111/b.9781405102537.2003.00012.x
  11. Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47(2). 257–281.10.2307/412081
  12. Campbell, Richard. 1996. Specificity operators in SpecDP. Studia Linguistica 50(2). 161–188.10.1111/j.1467-9582.1996.tb00348.x
  13. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program (Current Studies in Linguistics 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure. Vol. 3 (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizaretta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
  16. Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
  17. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 239–297.
  18. Citko, Barbara. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118(3). 261–295.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.05.009
  19. Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move, and labels (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 129). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794278
  20. Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  21. Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 21–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1). 1–25.
  23. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1993. A grammar of Mupun (Sprache und Oralität in Afrika 14). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
  24. Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In Samuel David Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (Generative Syntax 6). 90–105. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.10.1002/9780470755662.ch5
  25. Geist, Ljudmila. 2007. Predication and equation in copular sentences in Russian vs. English. In Ileana Comorowski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 84), 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_3
  26. Green, Melanie. 2007. Focus in Hausa (Publications of the Philological Society 40). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  27. Hale, Kenneth L. & Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001
  28. Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress (Current Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  29. Heggie, Lorie, A. 1988. The syntax of copular clauses. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of South California.
  30. Heusinger, Klaus von. 2002. Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19(3). 254–274.10.1093/jos/19.3.245
  31. Heycock, Caroline & Anthony Kroch. 1999. Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 365–397.10.1162/002438999554110
  32. Higgins, Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
  33. Higgins, Roger. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.
  34. Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511575129
  35. Huber, Christian. 1999. Issues in syntax and interpretation of Sumerian clauses. In Jeremy Black & Gábor Zólyomi (eds.), Proceedings of Workshop on Diachronic and Synchronic Variations in the Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax of Sumerian, (no pages). Oxford: Oriental Institute.
  36. Huber, Stefan. 2002. Es-Clefts und det-Clefts: Zur Syntax, Semantik und Informationsstruktur von Spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Schwedischen (Lunder Germanistische Forschungen 64). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.
  37. Kiss, Katalin É. 2006. Focussing as predication. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus (Studies in Generative Grammar 82), 193–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  38. Kiss, Katalin É. 2010. Structural focus and exhaustivity. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological and, experimental perspectives, 64–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0004
  39. Kohler, Klaus J. 2006. What is emphasis and how is it coded? In Rüdiger Hoffmann & Hansjörg Mixdorff (eds.), Speech prosody: 3rd International Conference, Dresden, May 2-5, 2006, 748–751. Dresden: TUDpress.
  40. Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85(2-3). 211–258.10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-W
  41. Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga. 2007. Small clauses reconsidered revisited: Not so small and not all alike, and far fewer. Lingua Posnaniensis 49. 83–91.
  42. Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga & Paweł Rutkowski. 2006. NP coordination as a new argument in the debate on the DP-analysis of Polish. In Blake H. Rodgers (ed.), Proceedings of WIGL 2006 (LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 6), 103–117.
  43. Mikkelsen, Line. 2005a. Copular clauses: Specification, predication and equation (Linguistik Aktuell 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.85
  44. Mikkelsen, Line. 2005b. Subject choice in copular clauses. Unpublished MS, UC Berkeley.10.1075/la.85
  45. Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956
  46. Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  47. Moro, Andrea. 2008. The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages (Current Studies in Linguistics 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262134989.001.0001
  48. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2001. On the nature of intra-clausal relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
  49. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. Copular sentences in Russian. A theory of intra-clausal relations (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 70). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-5793-8
  50. Prince, Ellen F. 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Weber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 231–250. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Progovac, Ljiljana. 2010. Syntax: Its evolution and its representation in the brain. Biolinguistics. 4.(2-3). 234–254.10.5964/bioling.8789
  52. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2001. Extraction from nominal phrases and the theory of determiners. In Ewa Willim & Piotr Bański (eds.), Formal approaches to Polish syntax, 159–198. Bloomington, IN; Slavica Publishers.
  53. Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies. Optimal and costly computation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001
  54. Rizzi, Luigi. 2006.“On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  55. Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the Minimalist Program. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0009
  56. Roy, Isabelle. 2006. Non-verbal predication: A syntactic analysis of predicational copular sentences. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California.
  57. Rutkowski, Paweł. 2006. From demonstratives to copulas: A cross-linguistic perspective and the case of Polish. Journal of Universal Language 7. 147–173.10.22425/jul.2006.7.2.147
  58. Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure (Current Studies in Linguistics 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  59. Sharvit, Yael. 1999. Connectivity in specificational sentences. Natural Language Semantics 7(3). 299–339.10.1023/A:1008390623435
  60. Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
  61. Tajsner, Przemysław. 2008. Aspects of the grammar of focus: A minimalist view (Polish Studies in English Language and Literature 24). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  62. Tajsner, Przemysław. forthcoming. On focus marking and predication. Evidence from Polish with some notes on Hausa. Lingua Posnaniensis.
  63. Wedgwood, Dan. 2003. Predication and information structure. A dynamic account of the Hungarian pre-verbal system. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Edinburgh.
  64. Wedgwood, Dan. 2006. Predication, focus and the positions of negation in Hungarian. Lingua 116(3). 351–376.
  65. Williams, Edwin. 1983. Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(3). 423–446.10.1007/BF00627484
  66. Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 319–346. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  67. Witkoś, Jacek. 1998. The syntax of clitics. Steps towards a minimalist account. Poznań. Motivex.
  68. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  69. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2005. Phrasal stress, focus, and syntax. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax. Vol. 3 (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 19), 522–568. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stap-2015-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 66
Published on: Mar 19, 2016
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Przemysław Tajsner, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.