Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Environmental impact analysis of five family houses in Eastern Slovakia through a life cycle assessment

Selected Scientific Papers - Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 14 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. [1] Zhang W, Tan S, Lei Y, Wang S (2014) Life cycle assessment of a single-family residential building in Canada: A case study. Build Simul. 7: 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0159-y.10.1007/s12273-013-0159-y
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Soust-Verdaguer B, Llatas C, García-Martínez A (2016) Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments. Build Environ. 103:215–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.014.10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.014
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Rossi B, Marique AF, Glaumann M, Reiter S (2012) Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, basic tool. Build Environ. 51:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.017.10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.017
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Weißenberger M, Jensch W, Lang W (2014) The convergence of life cycle assessment and nearly zero-energy buildings: The case of Germany. Energ Buildings. 76:551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.028.10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.028
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Lavagna M, Baldassarri C, Campioli A, Giorgi S, Valle AD, Castellani V, Sala S (2018) Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock. Build Environ. 145:260–275. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008.10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Adalberth K, Almgren A, Holleris Petersen E (2001) Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings. International Journal of Low Energy and Sustainable Buildings. 2:1–21.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Dahlstrøm O, Sørnes K, Eriksen ST, Hertwich EG (2012) Life cycle assessment of a single-family residence built to either conventional- or passive house standard. Energ Buildings. 54:470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.029.10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.029
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Monteiro H, Freire F (2012) Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods. Energ Buildings. 47:572–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.032.10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Shirazi A, Ashuri B (2018) Embodied life cycle assessment comparison of single family residential houses considering the 1970s transition in construction industry: Atlanta case study. Build Environ. 140:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.021.10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.021
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2012) Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses. Build Environ. 54:56–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.005.10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Arena AP, de Rosa C (2003) Life cycle assessment of energy and environmental implications of the implementation of conservative technologies in school building in Mendoza-Argentina. Build Environ. 38:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00056-2.10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00056-2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Scheuer C, Keoleian GA, Reppe P (2003) Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: Modeling challenges and design implications. Energ Buildings. 35:1049–1064. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00066-5.10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00066-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Junnila S, Horvath A, Guggemos AA (2006) Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States. J Infrastruct Syst. 12:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(10).10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(10)
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Xing S, Xu Z, Jun G (2008) Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings. Energ Buildings. 40:1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016.10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Kofoworola OF, Gheewala SH (2008) Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 13:498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0012-1.10.1007/s11367-008-0012-1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Sharma A, Saxena A, Sethi M, Shree V, Varun (2011) Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 15:871–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008.10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V (2013) Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energ Buildings. 64:73–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018.10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Petroche DM, Ramírez AD, Rodríguez CR, Salas DA, Boero AJ, Duque-Rivera J (2015) Life cycle assessment of residential buildings: A review of methodologies. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 194:217–225. http://doi.org/10.2495/SC150201.10.2495/SC150201
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Blengini GA (2009) Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Build Environ. 44:319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.007.10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Estokova A, Porhincak M (2012) Reduction of primary energy and CO2 emissions through selection and environmental evaluation of building materials. Theoretical foundations of chemical Engineering.. 46(6):704–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0758-z.10.1007/s10098-014-0758-z
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Hanandeh AE (2015) Environmental assessment of popular single-family house construction alternatives in Jordan. Build Environ. 92:192–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.032.10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.032
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Li P, Froese TM (2016) Life-cycle assessment of high performance, low cost homes. Procedia Eng. 145:1322–1329. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.170.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.170
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Pachrowski G, Noskowiak A, Lewandowska A, Strykowski W (2014) Wood as a building material in the light of environmental assessment of full life cycle of four buildings. Constr Build Mater. 52:428–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.066.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.066
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Häfliger IF, John V, Passer A, Lasvaux S, Hoxha E, Saade MRM, Habert G (2017) Buildings environmental impacts’ sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials. J Clean Prod. 156:805–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Guggemos AA, Horvath A (2005) Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings. J Infrastruct Syst. 11:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93).10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93)
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Gerilla GP, Teknomo K, Hokao K (2007) An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction. Build Environ. 42:2778–2784. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.021.10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.021
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Kylili A, Ilic M, Fokaides PA (2017) Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone. Resour Conserv Recy. 116:169–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.010.10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.010
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Vilčeková S, Čuláková M, Krídlová Burdová E, Katunská J (2015) Energy and environmental evaluation of non-transparent constructions of building envelope for wooden houses. Energies. 8(10):11047–11075. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81011047.10.3390/en81011047
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Asif M, Munner T, Kelley R (2007) Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build Environ. 42:1391–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Humbert S, Schryver AD, Bengoa X, Margni M, Jolliet O (2012) IMPACT 2002+: User guide. https://www.quantis-intl.com/pdf/IMPACT2002_UserGuide_for_vQ2.21.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Hermon P (2017) eTool. Life Cycle Assessment. Office presentation example, isetta square, eToolLCD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32]Jašek M, Česelský J, Vlček P, Černíková M & Berankova EW (2014) Application of BIM process by the evaluation of building energy sustainability. Advanced Materials Research. 899:7-10. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.7.10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.899.7
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Vilčeková S et al. (2018) Interlinked Sustainability Aspects of Low-Rise Residential Family House Development in Slovakia. Sustainability. 10:11-3966.10.3390/su10113966
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2019-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7278 | Journal ISSN: 1336-9024
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 92
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Technical University of Košice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Life cycle assessment (LCA),
Global warming potential (GWP),
Family house,
Green materials,
Green technologies
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2019 Andrea Moňoková, Silvia Vilčeková, published by Technical University of Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)Next article