Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Attempts for Common Understanding of the Concept of Worker as a Consequence of Globalisation? Cover

Attempts for Common Understanding of the Concept of Worker as a Consequence of Globalisation?

By: Joanna Ryszka  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. Barnard C. (2013). The substantive law of the EU. The Four Freedoms, Oxford.10.1093/he/9780199670765.001.0001
  2. Bartle I. (2006). Globalisation and EU Policy-making: The Neo-Liberal Transformation of Telecommunications and Electricity (European Policy Studies), Manchester.
  3. Brillat R. (2010). The European Social Charter and monitoring its implementation, [in:] N. Aliprantis, I. Papageorgiou (eds.), Social rights at European, regional and international level. Challenges for the 21st century, Bruxelles.
  4. Ciongaru E., Influence of globalization on the law system, “International Journal of Juridical Sciences” 2004, No. 1.
  5. Craig P., de Búrca G. (2007). EU law. Text, cases, and materials. Fourth Edition, Oxford.
  6. Creighton B., McCrystal C., 2016, Who is worker in international law?, “Comparative Labour Law & Comparative Journal”, No. 16/75.
  7. Cremers J., The free movement of workers in the EU – risks and challenges?, CLR News 2010, No. 2,
  8. Delbrück F., Globalization of Law, Politics, and Markets – Implications for Domestic Law – A European Perspective, “Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies” 1993, No. 1.
  9. Dølvik J.E., Visser J., Free movement, equal treatment and workers’ tights: can the European Union solve its trilemma of fundamental principle?, “Industrial Relations Journal” 2009, No. 40/6.10.1111/j.1468-2338.2009.00542.x
  10. Egan M.P., Constructing a European Market. Standards, Regulation and Governance, Oxford 2001.10.1093/0199244057.001.0001
  11. Eric C., Globalization and the future of the law of the sovereign state, “International Journal of Constitutional Law” 2010, No. 8/3.10.1093/icon/moq033
  12. Ewing K.D., Hendy J. QC. (2010), The Dramatic Implications of Demir and Baykara, “Industrial Law Journal” 2010, vol. 39, No. 1.10.1093/indlaw/dwp031
  13. Fairhurst J., 2014, Law of the European Union. Tenth Edition, Pearson.
  14. Horspool M., Humphreys M. (2014). European Union Law. 8th edition, Oxford.10.1093/he/9780199685615.001.0001
  15. Jackoby W., Meunier S., 2010, Europe and the management of globalisation, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2010, No. 17.10.1080/13501761003662107
  16. Jayassuriya R. (2008). The effect of globalisation on working conditions in developing countries. An analysis framework and country study results, “World Bank Employment Policy Primer”, No. 9.
  17. Lucas K., The Collective Complaint Procedure of the European Social Carte: Some Lessons for the EU?, “Legal Issues of Economic Integration” 2014, No. 41/33.10.54648/LEIE2014016
  18. Mielczarek D. (2004). Unia Europejska a globalizacja, “Studia Europejskie”, No. 3.
  19. Rocca M. (2013). Posting of Workers and Collective Labour Law: There and Back Again. Between Internal Market and Fundamental Rights, Cambridge– Antwerp–Portland.
  20. Rocca M., Enemy at the (flood) gates. Bringing the EU back to social justice through the international protection of social rights. A legal perspective (http://www.academia.edu/7657375/Enemy_at_the_flood_gates_-Bringing_the_EU_back_to_social_justice_through_the_international_protection_of_social_rights._A_legal_per 25.09.17).
  21. Seran M., The influence of globalization and international economic law on the development of national economic law, “International Journal of Business, Economics and Law” 2015, No. 7/4.
  22. Świątkowski A.M. (2015). Prawo pracy Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa.
  23. van Peijpe T., Collective labour law after Viking, Laval, Rüffert, and Commission v. Luxembourg, IJCLLIR 2009, Nr 25/2.10.54648/IJCL2009009
  24. Weatherill S. (2012). EU law. Cases & Materials, Oxford.10.1093/he/9780199639830.001.0001
  25. 15th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by the government of Sweden. Follow-up to collective complaints 85/2012 and 12/2002. Report registered by the Secretariat on 2 November 2015 (https://rm.coe.int/16804894f5, 10.7.17).
  26. Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11–31.
  27. Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provisions of services, OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, 1–6.
  28. European Commission Reflection paper on harnessing globalisation, COM(2017) 240 final.
  29. European Parliament Report on the Effects of Globalisation on the Intarnal Market (2004/2225(INI)).
  30. International Labour Conference, 92nd Session, 2004. A fair globalization. The role of the ILO, Geneva 2004.
  31. International Labour Conference, Report of the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards, 91st Sess., 2003.
  32. Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – The Revision of the Posting of Workers Directive, OJ C 185, 9.6.2017.
  33. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services’, OJ C 75, 10.03.2017.
  34. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/71/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, COM(2016) 128 final.
  35. Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on the free movement of workers within the European Union, OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1–12.
  36. Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 855–864.
  37. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case 139/85 Kempf v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1986] ECR 01741.
  38. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case 196/87 Steymann v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1988] ECR 06159.
  39. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-113/89 Rush Portuguesa Lda p. Office national d’immigration [1990] ECR I-01417.
  40. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-341/05 Laval un Partneri Ltd przeciwko Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet [2007] ECR I-11767.
  41. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-43/93 Raymond Vander Elst v Office des Migrations Internationales [1994] ECR I-3803.
  42. The Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-53/81 Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [1982] ECR 01035.
  43. The Court of Justice of the European Union judgement in case 66/85 Deborah Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg [1986] ECR 2121.
  44. The Court of Justice of the European Union judgement in case 75/63 Hoestra (née Unger) v Bestuur der Bedrijfsvereninging voor Detailhandel en Ambachten [1964] ECR 00347.
  45. The European Committee of Social Rights’ Decision of 3.7.2013 r. on the complaint No. 85/2012 Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, (https://rm.coe.int/168058d305, 10.7.17).
  46. The European Court of Human Rights judgement case Enerji Yapi-Yol Sen v Turkey [2009] ECHR Appl. No. 68959/01.
  47. The European Court of Human Rights judgement in case Demir and Baykara v Turkey [2008] ECHR Appl. No. 34503/97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0052 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 227
Published on: Apr 24, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Joanna Ryszka, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.