References
- Almăşan, A. (2017). The Arbitrability of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In A. Almăşan, P. Whelan (Eds.), The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law: Substantive and Procedural Challenges. Cham: Springer, 141–161.
- Basedow, J., Francq, S. & Idot, L. (2012). International Antitrust Litigation: Conflict of Laws and Coordination. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Commission Recommendation of 11 June 2013 on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law (OJ L 201, 26.07.2013).
- Commission Staff Working Document – Practical guide “Quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union” (C (2013) 3440, 11.06.2013).
- Communication from the Commission on quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 167, 13.06.2013).
- Conway, G. (2015). EU Law. London–New York: Routledge.
- Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (OJ L 349, 5.12.2014).
- EEC Council Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958)
- European Commission (2017). Transposition of the Directive in Member States. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/directive_en.html
- Judgment of the Supreme Court of Poland of 22 July 2008, II PK 360/07, published in Lex No. 500212.
- Modzelewska de Raad, M. (2017). Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damages Directive: Implementation in CEE Countries. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.
- Pais, S.O. & Piszcz, A. (2014). Package on Actions for Damages Based on Breaches of EU Competition Rules: Can One Size Fit All? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 7(10), 209–234.
- Pärn-Lee, E. (2017). In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 109–125.
- Petr, M. (2017). The Scope of Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE States. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.
- Piszcz, A. (2013). A few notes on the language of EU antitrust law in English-Polish translation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 34(47) [DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2013-0028], 161–174.10.2478/slgr-2013-0028],161174
- Piszcz, A. (2016). Is this really a reform to facilitate follow-on actions for antitrust damages? Some thoughts on the Damages Directive. In S.O. Pais (Ed.), Competition law challenges in the next decade. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang, 59–73.
- Piszcz, A. (2015). Piecemeal Harmonisation Through the Damages Directive? Remarks on What Received Too Little Attention in Relation to Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 8(12), 79–98.
- Piszcz, A. (2017). Quo vadis CEE? Summary. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 297–307.
- Piszcz, A. (2017a). Well Begun Is Half Done: Amendments to the Polish Legal Framework for Consensual Dispute Resolution Needed After Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU). Białystok Legal Studies 22(2), forthcoming.
- Piszcz, A. & Wolski, D. (2017). Poland. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 211–236.
- Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (COM (2013) 404 final, 11.06.2013).
- Robertson, C. (2013). How the European Union functions in 23 languages. Synaps 28, 14–32.
- Simonsson, I. (2010). Legitimacy in EU Cartel Control. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Strand, M. (2016). Beyond the Competition Damages Directive: What Room for Competition Law Restitution? In M. Bergström, M. Iacovides, M. Strand (Eds.), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 279–294.
- Strand, M. (2017). The Passing-On Problem in Damages and Restitution Under EU Law. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Tabory, M. (1980). Multilingualism in International Law and Institutions. Alphen aan den Rijn: Brill Archive.
- Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
- Turi, J.-G. (2012). Language Law and Language Rights, International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2(4), 1–18.
- Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1822, z poźn. zm.).
- Ustawa z 21 kwietnia 2017 r. o roszczeniach o naprawienie szkody wyrządzonej przez naruszenie prawa konkurencji (Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 1132).
- Ustawa z 23 kwietnia 1964 r. – Kodeks cywilny (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 459, z poźn. zm.).
- Ustawa z 23 września 2016 r. o pozasądowymrozwiązywaniu sporów konsumenckich (Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1823).
- Vlahek, A. & Podobnik, K. (2017). Slovenia. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 263–296.
- Wijckmans, F., Visser, M., Jaques, S. & Noël, E. (2015). The EU Private Damages Directive – Practical Insights. Minutes of the Closed Workshop 2015. Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland: Intersentia.