GENDER DIFFERENCES IN HIGH-STAKES MATHS TESTING. FINDINGS FROM POLAND
References
- Angoff, W. H. (1993) Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning in Differential Item Functioning. In P. W. Holland & Howard Wainer (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge.
- Ayala de, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Publications.
- Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (2000). Can item format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in mathematics achievement? Sex Roles, 42(1-2), 1-21. 10.1023/A:1007051109754
- Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 198.
- Doris, A., O’Neill, D., & Sweetman, O. (2013). Gender, single-sex schooling and maths achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35, 104-119.
- Ellison, G., & Swanson, A. (2009). The gender gap in secondary school mathematics at high achievement levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions (No. w15238). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2009). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics (No. w15430). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17-28. 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
- Golia, S. (2012). Differential Item Functioning classification for polytomously scored items. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 5(3), 367-373.
- Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. New York: Psychology press.
- Henderson, D. L. (2001). Prevalence of Gender DIF in Mixed Format High School Exit Examinations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle).
- Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1986). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco).
- Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 8801-8807.
- Jurajda, S., & Munich, D. (2008). Gender Gap in Admission Performance under Competitive Pressure. CERGE-EI Working Paper Series, (371).
- Kling, K. C., Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2012). Why do standardized tests underpredict women’s academic performance? The role of conscientiousness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 600-606.
- Kosmala-Anderson, J. (2006). Płeć a natężenie i rodzaj psychosomatycznych reakcji na stres egzaminacyjny. Przegląd terapeutyczny 1/2006.
- Kondratek, B., & Grudniewska, M. (2014). Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel with IRT procedures for DIF detection and effect size estimation for dichotomous items. Edukacja Quarterly, 128(3).
- Kenney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 11.
- Meyer, J. P. (2014). Applied measurement with jMetrik. New York: Routledge. Ors, E., Palomino, F., & Peyrache, E. (2013). Performance gender gap: does competition matter? Journal of Labor Economics, 31(3), 443-499.
- Stoet, G., & Geary D.C. (2013) Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE 8(3): e57988.
- Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 93. 10.1037/a0026617
- Skorska, P., & Świst, K. (2014). Wielkość efektu płci w wewnątrzszkolnych i zewnątrzszkolnych wskaźnikach osiągnięć ucznia. Konferencja PTDE.
- Świst, K., Skorska, P., Koniewski, M., & Jasińska-Maciążek, A. (2015). Sex differences in guessing and item omission. Edukacja, 3, 48-62.
- Szaleniec, H., Kondratek, B., Kulon, F., Pokropek, A., Skorska, P., Świst, K., & Żołtak, M. (2015). Porownywalne wyniki egzaminacyjne. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
- Jakubowski, M., & Pokropek, A. (2009). Badając egzaminy: Podejście ilościowe w badaniach edukacyjnych. Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna.
- Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 1123.
- Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1067-1101. 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
- Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129-144. 10.1257/jep.24.2.129
- Penner, A. M. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology 114: S138-S170.
- PISA, O. (2012). Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. [2014-12-03].
- Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental psychology, 50(4), 1262.
- Tannenbaum, D. I. (2012). Do gender differences in risk aversion explain the gender gap in SAT scores? Uncovering risk attitudes and the test score gap. Unpublished paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.
- Zwick, R., & Ercikan, K. (1989). Analysis of differential item functioning in the NAEP history assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 55-66.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00318.x
Language: English
Page range: 205 - 226
Published on: Oct 31, 2017
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2017 Alicja Zawistowska, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.