Have a personal or library account? Click to login
BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND THE COMMON. HOW GROUPS REACT TO SOCIALLY UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOUR Cover

BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND THE COMMON. HOW GROUPS REACT TO SOCIALLY UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOUR

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. 2006. Psychologia społeczna. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
  2. Chwe, M. S. Y. 2000. Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies, 67(1), 1-16.
  3. Coleman, James S. 1986. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology: 1309-1335. 10.1086/228423
  4. Coleman, J., Katz, E. & Menzel, H. 1957. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253-270. 10.2307/2785979
  5. Easley, David & Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Vol. 8 Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511761942
  6. Fischer, Peter, JoachimI. Krueger, Tobias Greitemeyer, Claudia Vogrincic, Andreas Kastenmüller, Dieter Frey, Moritz Heene, Magdalena Wicher, and Martina Kainbacher. 2011. “The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies. Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 517-537. 10.1037/a0023304
  7. Granovetter, M. & Soong, R. 1983. Treshold models of diffusion and collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9, 165-179. 10.1080/0022250X.1983.9989941
  8. Haman, Jacek. 2014. Gry wokoł nas. Socjolog i teoria gier. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  9. Jackson, Matthew O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400833993
  10. Kärnä, Annti, Marinus Voeten, Elisa Poskiparta & Christina Salmivalli. 2010. Vulnerable Children in Varying Classroom Contexts: Bystanders’ Behaviors Moderate the Effects of Risk Factors on Victimization. “Merrill-Palmer Quarterly” 56 (3): 261-282. 10.1353/mpq.0.0052
  11. Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2009. Grzech zaniechania. Świadkowie przemocy szkolnej w perspektywie teorii gier. “Decyzje” 11: 5-47.
  12. Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2013.Między głosem sumienia a więzami przyjaźni. Zachowanie świadkow dręczenia (bullying) a struktura klasy szkolnej. Decyzje, nr 20/2013, s. 67-104.
  13. Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2014a. Świadkowie przemocy na strukturalnym polu minowym. Analiza zależności między strukturą grupy a zakresem reakcji na agresję. Decyzje, nr 2/2014.
  14. Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2014b. Grupowe uwarunkowania przemocy szkolnej. Doctoral thesis, available at the University of Warsaw. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/749
  15. Lelarge, M. 2012. Diffusion and cascading behavior in random networks. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(2), 752-775. 10.1016/j.geb.2012.03.009
  16. Olweus, Dan. 1993. Bullying at School: What we Know and what we can Do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  17. Palfrey, T. R. & Rosenthal, H. 1984. Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: A strategic analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 24(2), 171-193.10.1016/0047-2727(84)90023-9
  18. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press, Simon and Shuster.
  19. Ryan, B. & Gross, N. C. 1950. Acceptance and diffusion of hybrid corn seed in two Iowa communities. Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 163
Published on: Oct 31, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2017 Agata Komendant-Brodowska, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.