Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Risks of Interrogation with the Help of an Interpreter in the Criminal Procedure

By:
Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. Elek, B. 2007. Influencing the Confession in the Criminal Procedure. Debrecen: Toth K¨onyvkeresked´es ´es Kiado Kft.
  2. Elek, B. 2014. Connections between judicial conviction and the statement of facts. in: Jura 2014 XX./1.
  3. Papp, F. 1977. On the words of the explanatory dictionary with the most meanings. In: Hungarian Language Today. Borb´ala Keszler (ed.) Budapest: Tank¨onyvkiado.
  4. Tremmel, F. 2006. Evidence in Criminal Procedure. Budapest-P´ecs: Dialog Campus.
  5. Gudykunst, W. B. 2003. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks (CA).
  6. González, R. D. 1994. The Federal Court Interpreter Certification Project: Defining World Class Standards for Court Interpretation. (Proceedings of IJET 4, Brisbane, University of Queensland) IN: GAMAL, Muhammad (1998): Court Interpreting. In: Baker, Mone (eds.) Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies. London/New York, Routledge.
  7. Kövágó, G. 2009. The Theoretical and Practical Basics of Communication. Aula.
  8. Hall, E. T. 1987. Hidden Dimensions. Budapest: Gondolat.
  9. Horváth, I. 2012. Interpreter Behaviour. A Psychological Approach. Budapest: Hang Language School.
  10. Horváth, I. 2013. Court Interpretation. Budapest.
  11. Lempp, H. J. 2002. Means of Questioning Right. Psychotherapy.
  12. Joachim, H. 1993. The Reformation of Penal Procedure in Eastern and Western Europe. translated by: Endre Bocz. Hungarian Law.
  13. Róka J. and Hochel S. (ed.) 2009. Intercultural and International Communication in The Globalised World. Budapest: Budapest College of Business and Communication.
  14. Hidasi, J 2004. Intercultural Communication. Scolar.
  15. Balassa, L. 1977. The synonyms of the verb dawning and the depiction of dawn in literature. in: Hungarian Language Today. Borb´ala Keszler (ed.) Budapest: Tank¨onyvkiado.
  16. Neuliep, J. W. 2006. Intercultural Communication. A Contextual Approach. Thousand Oaks (CA).
  17. Végvári, R. 2005. Certain Questions of the English Penal Procedure. A Cross- Section. Szeged: President of the Advisory Board of the Elem´er Polay Foundation.
  18. Samovar, L. A., and Porter, Richard E. - McDaniel, Erwin, R. 2007. Communication between Cultures. Belmont (CA).
  19. Toomey, T., and Stellan- Chung, Leeva, C. 2005. Understanding Intercultural Communication. Los Angeles (CA).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 139
Published on: Apr 26, 2017
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2017 Csilla Hati, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.