Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Genre Variation and Changes in Frame Sequences Across Cultures: The Case of Criminology RA Abstracts in English and French

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow/ New York: Longman.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bhatia, V. K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bondi, M. 1997. The Rise of Abstracts. Development of the Genre in the Discourse of Economics. Textus 10, 395-418.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bondi, M. 2001. Small Corpora and Language Variation. Reflexivity across Genres. In Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. R., & Robert L. (Eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 135-174.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bondi, M. 2004. The discourse function of academic connectors in abstracts. In Stenstr¨om, A.-B., & Aijmer, K. (eds.), Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 139-156.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bondi, M. 2010. Abstract Writing: The Phraseology of Self-representation. In Conejero Lopez, M., Mu´noz Calvo, M., & Pe´nas Ib´anez, B. (eds.), Linguistic Interactions in/and Specific Discourses. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Polit´ecnica de Valencia, 31-38.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bondi, M., Cavalieri, S. 2012. The Evolution of the Abstract as a Genre: 1988-2008. The Case of Applied Linguistics. In Garzone, G., Catenaccio, P., & Degano, C. (eds.), Genre Change in the Contemporary World. Short-term Diachronic Perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang, 43-54.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Bordet, G. 2011. Etude contrastive de r´esum´e de thˇcse dans une perspective d’analyse de genre. Thˇcse de doctorat Universit´e Paris Diderot - Paris 7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Busch-Lauer, I.A. 1995. Textual Organization in English and German Abstracts. Anglicana Turkuensia 14, 175-186.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Busch-Lauer, I.A. 2014. Abstracts: Cross-linguistic, Disciplinary and Intercultural Perspectives. In Bondi, M., Lor´es Sanz, R. (eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, 43-64.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cavalieri, S. 2014. Variation across Disciplines. The Case of Applied Linguistics and Medicine. In Bondi, M., Lor´es Sanz, R. (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, 161-174.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Crosnier, E. 1993. L’abstract scientifique anglais-fran，cais: contraintes et libert´es. Actes du 14e Colloque de Geras. ASp en ligne 2, 1993.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Dahl, T. 2004. Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1807-1825.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Dahl, T. 2009. Author Identity in Economics and Linguistics Abstracts. In Suomela-Salmi, E., Dervin, F. (eds.), Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourses. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 123-133.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Diani, G. 2014. On English and Italian Research Article Abstracts: Genre Variation Across Cultures. In Bondi, M., Lor´es Sanz, R. (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, 65-83.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Dos Santos, M.B. 1996. The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text 16(4), 481-499.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Gillaerts P., van De Velde F. 2010. Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Jeap 9(2), 128-139.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Golebiowski, Z. 2009. Prominent Messages in Education and Applied Linguistic Abstracts: How do Authors Appeal to their Prospective Readers? Journal of Pragmatics 41/4, 753-769.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. 2011. Patterns of Linguistics Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus Based Study. Łodź Studies in Language vol. 22, edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing House.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0678
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hatzitheodorou, A.-M. 2012. A Genre-oriented Analysis of Research Article Abstracts in Law and Business Journals. In Bondi, M., Lor´es Sanz, R. (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, 175-198.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Hunston, S. (2008). Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (3), 271-295.10.1075/ijcl.13.3.03hun
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Hunston, S., Francis, G. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/New York: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary discourses. London: Longman.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Kaplan, R.B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L.D., Shiotani, Y., and Zimmerman, C. 1994. On Abstract Writing. Text 14(3), 401-426.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Lorés Sanz, R. 2004. On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Lorés Sanz, R. 2006. ‘IWill Argue that’: First Person Pronouns and Metadiscoursal Devices in RA Abstracts in English and Spanish. ESP across Cultures 3, 23-40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Lorés Sanz, R. 2008. Genres in Contrast: the Exploration of Writers’ Visibility in Research Articles and Research Article Abstracts. In Burgess, S., & Mart´ın- Mart´ın, P. (Eds.), English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Bern: Peter Lang, 105-122.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Lorés Sanz, R. 2009. Different Worlds, Different Audiences: A Contrastive Analysis of Research Article Abstracts. In Suomela-Salmi, E., & Dervin, Fred (Eds.) Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 187-198.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Martín-Martín, P. 2002. A genre-based investigation of abstract writing in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 47-64.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Martín-Martín, P. 2005. The rhetoric of abstracts in English and Spanish scientific discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Pho, P.D. 2008. Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance. Discourse Studies 10(2), 231-250.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Stotesbury, H. 2003. Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts in the Narrative and Hard Sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4), 327-34110.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Swales, J. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Swales, J., Feak, C. 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Tardy, C. 2004. The role of English in scientific communication: lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 247-269.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Van Bonn, S., Swales, J. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6, 94-108.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Van Weijen, D. 2012. The Language of (Future) Scientific Communication. Research Trends, 31. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientific-communication/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Wable, T., Holzem, M. 2004. Structure textuelle et communication scientifique. Bases de donn´ees Pascal et Francis CNRS hsic 00001333i.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 53
Published on: Apr 26, 2017
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Criminology abstract,
IMRD rhetorical move,
frame sequences,
(im)personal/locational patterns,
cross-cultural variation
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2017 Silvia Cavalieri, Chiara Preite, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)Next article