References
- Bermejo-Luque, L. (2009). Argumentation theory and the concept of epistemic justification. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 285–303
- Carnap, Rudolf. 1952. The continuum of inductive methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Hitchcock, D. (1999). The Thomas-Nolt dispute: some lessons about induction. Informal Logic, 19(2), 201–21210.22329/il.v19i2.2328
- Popper, Karl. (1962). On Carnap’s version of Laplace’s rule of succession. Mind, 69–7310.1093/mind/LXXI.281.69
- Nolt, J. (1984). Possible worlds and imagination in informal logic. Informal Logic, 6(2), 14–1710.22329/il.v6i2.2728
- Nolt, J. (1985). More on induction and possible worlds: replies to Thomas and Kahane. Informal Logic, 7(1), 55–6010.22329/il.v7i1.2702
- Szymanek, K. (2014). Justification and argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 231–23910.2478/slgr-2014-0012
- Thomas, S. (1984). Degrees of validity and ratios of conceivable worlds. Informal Logic, 6(3), 31–34
- Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Weddle, Perry. (1979). Inductive, deductive. Informal Logic, 2(1), 1–5
- Weisberg, Jonathan. (2011). Varieties of Bayesianism. In D. Gabbay, S. Hartmann and J. Woods (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic vol.10: Inductive Logic (Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 477–552)10.1016/B978-0-444-52936-7.50013-6