Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Many Uses of Predicates of Taste and the Challenge from Disagreement Cover

The Many Uses of Predicates of Taste and the Challenge from Disagreement

By: Dan Zeman  
Open Access
|Nov 2016

References

  1. Barker, Chris. 2002. “The Dynamics of Vagueness.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 1–36.10.1023/A:1014346114955
  2. Caso, Ramiro. 2014. “Assertion and Relative Truth.” Synthese 191: 1309–1325.10.1007/s11229-013-0329-6
  3. Cappelen, Herman, and John Hawthorne. 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560554.001.0001
  4. Cappelen Herman, and John Hawthorne. 2011. “Reply to Lasersohn, MacFarlane, and Richard.” Philosophical Studies 156: 449–466.10.1007/s11098-010-9627-8
  5. Francén, Ragnar. 2010. “No Deep Disagreement for New Relativists.” Philosophical Studies 151(1): 19–37.10.1007/s11098-009-9414-6
  6. Francén, Ragnar. 2013. “Moral Relativism, Error-Theory, and Ascriptions of Mistakes.” Journal of Philosophy 110 (10): 564–580.10.5840/jphil20131101010
  7. García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2008. “Relativism, Vagueness and What Is Said.” In Relative Truth, edited by Manuel García-Carpintero and Max Kölbel, 129–154. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234950.003.0006
  8. Glanzberg, Michael. 2007. “Context, Content, and Relativism.” Philosophical Studies 136(1): 1–29.10.1007/s11098-007-9145-5
  9. Hirvonen, Sanna. 2015. Predicates of Personal Taste and Perspective Dependence, Ph.D. thesis, University College London.
  10. Huvenes, T. T. 2012. “Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90(1): 167–181.10.1080/00048402.2010.550305
  11. Huvenes, T.T. 2014. “Disagreement without Error.” Erkenntnis 79 (1, Supplement): 143–154.
  12. Kaplan, David. 1989. “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by John Almog, John Perry and Howard Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford University Press.
  13. Kölbel, Max. 2003. “Faultless Disagreement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104(1): 53–73.10.1111/1467-9264.t01-1-00003
  14. Kölbel, Max. 2004. “Indexical Relativism vs Genuine Relativism.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12(3): 297–313.10.1080/0967255042000243966
  15. Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. “Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28(6): 643–686.10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
  16. Lasersohn, Peter. 2009. “Relative Truth, Speaker Commitment, and Control of Implicit Arguments.” Synthese 166: 359–374.10.1007/s11229-007-9280-8
  17. Lasersohn, Peter. 2011. “Context, Relevant Parts and (Lack of) Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 156: 433–439.10.1007/s11098-010-9625-x
  18. Lasersohn, Peter. 2013. “Non-World Indices and Assessment-Sensitivity.” Inquiry 56(2–3): 122–148.10.1080/0020174X.2013.784463
  19. Lindquist, Julie. 2002. A Place to Stand. Politics and Persuasion in a Working-Class Bar. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195140378.001.0001
  20. Lopez de Sa, Dan. 2008. “Presuppositions of Commonality: An Indexical Relativist Account of Disagreement.” In Relative Truth, edited by Manuel García-Carpintero and Max Kölbel, 297–310. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234950.003.0014
  21. López de Sa, Dan. 2015. “Expressing Disagreement.” Erkenntnis 80: 153–165.10.1007/s10670-014-9664-3
  22. Ludlow, Peter. 2014. Living Words: Meaning Underdetermination and the Dynamic Lexicon. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712053.001.0001
  23. MacFarlane, John. 2007. “Relativism and Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 132(1): 17–31.10.1007/s11098-006-9049-9
  24. MacFarlane, John. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682751.001.0001
  25. Marques, Teresa. 2014. “Doxastic Disagreement.” Erkenntnis 79(1, Supplement): 121–142.
  26. Marques, Teresa, andManuel García-Carpintero. 2014. “Disagreement about Taste: Commonality Presuppositions and Coordination.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92(4): 701–723.10.1080/00048402.2014.922592
  27. Moltmann, Friederike. 2010. “Relative Truth and the First Person.” Philosophical Studies 150(2): 187–220.10.1007/s11098-009-9383-9
  28. Parsons, Josh. 2013. “Presupposition, Disagreement, and Predicates of Taste.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113: 163–173.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2013.00350.x
  29. Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13(23): 1–37.
  30. Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell. 2014. “Antipositivist Arguments from Legal Talk and Thought.” In Pragmatism, Law, and Language, edited by G. Hubb and D. Lind, 56–75. Routledge.
  31. Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382
  32. Recanati, François. 2007. Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230532.001.0001
  33. Rothschild, Daniel, and Gabriel Segal. 2009. “Indexical Predicates.” Mind and Language 24(4): 467–493.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01371.x
  34. Schaffer, Jonathan. 2011. “Perspective in taste predicates and epistemic modals.” In Epistemic Modals, edited by Brian Weatherson and Andy Egan, 179–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0007
  35. Stojanovic, Isidora. 2007. “Talking about Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments, and Relative Truth.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6): 691–706.10.1007/s10988-008-9030-5
  36. Stojanovic, Isidora. 2011. “When (True) Disagreement Gives Out.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 32: 181–193.
  37. Stojanovic, Isidora. 2012. “Emotional Disagreement.” Dialogue 51(1): 99–117.10.1017/S001221731200025X
  38. Snyder, Eric. 2013. “Binding, Genericity, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Inquiry 56(2–3): 278–306.
  39. Sundell, Timothy. 2011. “Disagreements about Taste.” Philosophical Studies 155(2): 267–288.10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6
  40. Zeman, Dan. 2016. “Contextualism and Disagreement about Taste.” In Subjective Meaning: Alternatives to Relativism, edited by Cecile Meier and Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink, 91–104. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110402001-006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 101
Published on: Nov 23, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2016 Dan Zeman, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.