Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Semantic Relations between Legal Terms. A Case Study of the Intralingual Relation of Synonymy Cover

Semantic Relations between Legal Terms. A Case Study of the Intralingual Relation of Synonymy

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 45 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2016
References

References

  1. Alcaraz Varó, E. & Hughes, B. (2002). Legal Translation Explained. Manchester: S. Jerome Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bańczerowski, J. & Matulewska, A. (2012). Towards the Foundations of Legilinguistic Translatology. In P. Grzegorczyk, K. Knoppek & M. Walasik (eds.), Proces cywilny. Nauka - Kodyfikacja - Praktyka. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Feliksowi Zedlerowi (pp. 1225-1261). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bańczerowski, J. (1996). A Formal Approach to a General Theory of Language. In R. Sackermann (ed.), Theoretical Linguistics and Grammatical Description. Papers in Honour of Hans-Heinrich Lieb. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 138. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bańczerowski, J. (2001). The Linguistic Legacy of Ludwik Zabrocki. In St. Puppel (ed.), The Ludwik Zabrocki Memorial Lecture (pp. 9-49). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Berk-Seligson, S. (1999). The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. In International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, vol. 6, No. 1 (1999).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Bogusławski, A. (1986). O pojęciu wyjaśniania i wyjaśnianiu w lingwistyce. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego. XL, 45-51.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Cao, D. (2007). Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Cheshire, J. (ed.). (1994). English around the World. Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Crystal, D. (1985). How Many Millions? The Statistics of English Today. English Today 1, 7-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Delisle J. et al. (eds.) (1999). Translation Terminology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Galdia, M. (2009). Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Goddard, Ch. (2009). Where Legal Cultures Meet: Translating Confrontation into Coexistence. Investigationes Linguisticae vol. XVII, 168-205.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Grøn, H. (1992). Legal Language and the Legal Translator. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics no. 9, 113-139.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Jackob, J. I. H. (1995). Atkin’s Encyclopaedia of Court Forms in Civil Proceedings. Volume 10. Companies - Winding-up. London: Butterworths.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Jakubecki, A., Zedler F. (2003). Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze. Komenatrze Zakamycza. Krakow: Zakamycze.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Jopek-Bosiacka, A. (2010). Legal Communication: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Keay, A., Walton P. (2003). Insolvency Law: Corporate and Personal. London: Pearson Education Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kielar, B. Z. (1996). Na manowcach tłumaczenia tekstu prawnego: prawdopodobieństwo wywołania szoku kulturowego. In F. Grucza & K. Chomicz-Jung (eds.), Problemy komunikacji interkulturowej. Jedna Europa - wiele językow i wiele kultur (pp. 135-141).Warszawa:Wydawnictwo UniwersytetuWarszawskiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kierzkowska, D. (2002). Tłumaczenie prawnicze. Warszawa:Wydawnictwo TEPIS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kierzkowska, D. (ed.) (2011). Kodeks Tłumacza Przysięgłego z komentarzem. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Translegis.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kubacki, A. D. (2012). Tłumaczenie poświadczone. Status, kształcenie, warsztat i odpowiedzialność tłumacza przysięgłego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Business.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kubacki, A. D. (2013). Teksty paralelne jako narzędzie pomocnicze przy sporządzaniu tłumaczeń specjalistycznych. Comparative Legilinguistics 20013/13, 137-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Łętowska Ewa (ed.) (2013). Prawo zobowiązań - część ogolna, Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2005). Podstawy językoznawstwa komputerowego. Łodź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łodzkiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Marsh, D. (2004). Bankruptcy, Insolvency and the Law. A Comprehensive Guide to All Aspects of Bankruptcy and Insolvency. Revised Edition. Brighton: Easyway Guides.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Mattila, H. (2006). Comparative Legal Linguistics. England: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Mattila, H. (2013). Comparative Legal Linguistics. England: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Matulewska, A. (2007). Lingua Legis in Translation. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Matulewska, A. (2013). Legilinguistic Translatology. A Parametric Approach to Legal Translation. Frankfurt amMain, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Matulewska, A., Nowak, P. (2006). Polskie sprawozdanie finansowe w tłumaczeniu na francuski. Lingua Legis no. 14, 65-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Neubert, A. (1996). Text linguistics of Translation: The Textual Approach to Translation. In R. M. Gaddis (ed.), Translation Horizons Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum. Translation Perspectives IX (pp. 87-105). Binghamton: Center for Research in Translation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Newmark, P. (1982). Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. UK: Prentice Hall International Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Newmark, P. (1991). About Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Popiołek Wojciech (ed.) (2013). Międzynarodowe prawo handlowe, Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Rajak, H. (1991). Insolvency Law. Theory and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Rayar, L. (1992). Translating Law: Method or Madness? In J. Miller (ed.), International Forum of Legal Translation 1992. Proceedings (pp. 62-71). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo TEPIS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Roald J., Whittaker S. (2010). Verbalisation in French and Norwegian Legislative Texts: A Contrastive Case Study. In M. Gotti & Ch. Williams (eds.), Legal Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. Linguistic Insights 117 (pp. 95-107). Bern: Peter Lang.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Šarčević, S. ( 2000). New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Smith, S. A. (1995). Culture Clash: Anglo-American Case Law and German Civil Law in Translation. In M. Morris (ed.), Translation and the Law (pp. 181-197). American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, vol. VIII, 1995. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Tolmie, F. (1998). Introduction to Corporate and Personal Insolvency Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Vermeer, H. J. (2001). Skopos and Commission in Translational Action. In L. Venuti & M. Baker (eds.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 221-232). London, New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Vinay, J.-P., Darbelnet J. (1966). Stylistique compar´ee du fran，cais et de l’anglais. Paris: Didier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Winter, R. J. (2012). What did he say? Mistranslations in the court. In: Judicial Notebook. Retrieved July 2013 from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/03/jn.aspx
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Zabrocki, L. (1963). Wspolnoty komunikatywne w genezie i rozwoju języka niemieckiego. Część I. Prehistoria języka niemieckiego. Wrocław, Warszawa, Krakow: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Zedler, F. (2004). Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze w zarysie. Krakow: Zakamycze.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 161 - 174
Published on: Jul 14, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
legal terminology,
legal translation,
parametrisation of legal translation,
parametrisation of legal terms,
synonymy,
quasi-synonymy
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2016 Aleksandra Matulewska, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 45 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article