Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Intersections between Law and Language: Disciplinary Concepts in Second Language Legal Literacy

Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. Bhatia, V. K. (1989). Legislative writing: A case of neglect in EA/OLP courses. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 223-238.10.1016/0889-4906(89)90014-8
  2. Bruce, N. (2002). Dovetailing language and content: Teaching balanced argument in legal problem answer writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 321-345.10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00040-0
  3. Davies, M. (1987). Reading cases. The Modern Law Review, 50(4), 409-431.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1987.tb01719.x
  4. Hartig, A. J. (forthcoming). Connecting language and content in English for Specific Purposes: Case studies in law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  5. Hoffman, C. (2011). Using discourse analysis methodology to teach “legal English”. International Journal of Law, Language, & Discourse, 1(2), 1-19.
  6. Hoffman, C., & Tyler, A. (2008). United States legal discourse: Legal English for foreign LLMs. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
  7. Howe, P. (1993). Planning a pre-sessional course in English for academic legal purposes. In G. M. Blue (Ed.), Language, learning and success: Studying through English (pp. 148-157). London: Macmillan.
  8. In re George B, 279 Cal. Rptr. 388 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)
  9. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Liebenberg, E. (2012). Using images as an effective tool to facilitate teaching legal concepts. Cahiers de l’APLIUT, XXXI(1), 44-59.10.4000/apliut.2260
  11. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203966273
  12. Northcott, J. (2013). Legal English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 213-226).West Sussex:Wiley- Blackwell.
  13. People v. Huggins, 60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997).
  14. People v. McElroy, 48 P. 718 (Cal. 1897).
  15. People v. Williams, 12 Cal. Rptr. 2d 243 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992).
  16. Sierocka, H. (2014). Cultural dimensions of legal discourse. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 38(51), 189-196. doi: 10.2478/slgr-2014-003910.2478/slgr-2014-0039
  17. Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.001.0001
  18. Swales, J. (1985). A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Language across the curriculum. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  19. Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  20. van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783091409
  21. White, G. (1979). The subject specialist and the ESP teacher Lexden Papers [Essays on Teaching English for Specific Purposes by the staff of the Colchester and Bedford Study Centres] (Vol. 2, pp. 9-14). Oxford: Lexden Centre.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 86
Published on: Jul 14, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2016 Alissa J. Hartig, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.