Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theoretical Controversies—Terminological Biases: Consciousness Revisited Cover

Theoretical Controversies—Terminological Biases: Consciousness Revisited

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Baars, B. J. (2007). The global workspace theory of consciousness. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 235–246). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  2. Baars, B. J. (n.d.). Beyond the mind-body problem: Seven testable criteria for consciousness. Retrieved from http://mbscience.academia.edu/Departments/CEO/Documents?page=4
  3. Baars, B. J., Franklin, S., & Ramsoy, T. Z. (2013). Global workspace dynamics: cortical “binding and propagation” enables conscious contents. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 200, 1–22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.0020010.3389/fpsyg.2013.00200
  4. Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (Eds.). (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness. Oxford: Elsevier.
  5. Baars, B. J., Seth, A. K., & Edelman, D. B. (2005). Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 119–139.10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.006
  6. Bergson, H. (2007). An introduction to metaphysics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001
  8. Chemero, A., & Silberstein, M. (2012). Complexity and extended phenomenological-cognitive systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 35–50.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01168.x
  9. Descartes, R. (1901). The method, meditations and philosophy of Descartes (J. Veitch, Trans.). Washington: M. Walter Dunne. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1698
  10. Degenaar, J., & Keijzer, F. (2009). Workspace and sensorimotor theories: Complementary approaches to experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 77–102. Retrieved: https://www.academia.edu/953797/Workspace_and_Sensorimotor_Theories
  11. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  12. Ivins, W. M. Jr. (1953). Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. James, W. (1987). Does “consciousness” exist? (B. Kulkick, Ed.). Writings 1902–1910. New York: Penguin Books.
  14. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior (L. A. Fisher, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  15. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception (J. M. Edie, Ed.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  16. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2008). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). London: Routledge.
  17. O’Regan, K. (2011). Why red doesn’t sound like a bell: Understanding the feel of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  19. Sloman, A. (2010). Phenomenal and access consciousness and the Hard Problem: A view from the designer stance. Journal of Machine Consciousness, 02(01), 117–169. doi: 10.1142/S179384301000042410.1142/S1793843010000424
  20. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Wittgenstein’s lectures. Cambridge, 1932–1935 (A. Ambrose, Ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 160
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2015 Zsuzsanna Kondor, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.