Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago) Cover

The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago)

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Bartels, A. (2006). Defending the structural concept of representation. Theoria, 21(1), 7–19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bickhard, M. H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 285–333. doi:10.1080/0952813930895377510.1080/09528139308953775
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bickhard, M. H. (2008). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3), 547–591. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bickhard, M. H., & Richie, D. M. (1983). On the nature of representation: a case study of James Gibson’s theory of perception. New York: Praeger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bielecka, K. (2014). Błędne reprezentacje a pojęcie funkcji w teleosemantyce. Analiza koncepcji Dretskego i Millikan. Filozofia Nauki, 1(85), 105–120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Brentano, F. (1900). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Hamburg: F. Meiner.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, R. J. (2011). The concept of truth. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230307803
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, L. (1900). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. New York: Street & Smith.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Chrudzimski, A. (1999). Die Theorie der Intentionalität bei Franz Brentano. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 57, 45–66. doi:10.5840/gps199957410.5840/gps1999574
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101(3), 401–431. doi:10.1007/BF0106389610.1007/BF01063896
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Craik, K. (1967). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, R., & Roth, M. (2012). Meaning and content in cognitive science. In R. Schantz (Ed.), Prospects for meaning (pp. 365–382). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Decock, L., & Douven, I. (2010). Similarity after Goodman. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(1), 61–75. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Dretske, F. I. (1986). Misrepresentation. In R. Bogdan (Ed.), Belief: form, content, and function (pp. 17–37). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Dretske, F. I. (1988). Explaining behaviour: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Field, H. (1972). Tarski’s theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 69(13), 347–375.10.2307/2024879
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Fodor, J. A. (1992). A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6765.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2015). Minds without meanings: An essay on the content of concepts.10.7551/mitpress/9780262027908.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, N. (1951). The structure of appearance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90–129. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.00410.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175.10.1086/286983
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kirchhoff, M. D. (2011). Anti-representationalism: Not a well-founded theory of cognition. Res Cogitans, 2, 1–34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. MacKay, D. M. (1969). Information, mechanism and meaning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3769.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Mendelovici, A. (2012). Reliable misrepresentation and tracking theories of mental representation. Philosophical Studies, 165(2), 421–443. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9966-810.1007/s11098-012-9966-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Millikan, R. G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content. The Philosophical Review, 95(1), 47–80.10.2307/2185132
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Millikan, R. G. (2007). An input condition for teleosemantics? Reply to Shea (and Godfrey-Smith). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(2), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00083.x10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00083.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Miłkowski, M. (2015a). Function and causal relevance of content. New Ideas in Psychology, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.00310.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Miłkowski, M. (2015b). Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms. Biology & Philosophy, (February). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9481-310.1007/s10539-015-9481-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Newman, M. H. A. (1928). Mr. Russell’s “Causal Theory of Perception”. Mind, 37(146), 137–148.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Pattee, H. H. (1972). Physical problems of decision-making constraints. International Journal of Neuroscience, 3(3), 99–105. doi:10.3109/0020745720914762910.3109/00207457209147629
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO978051159795410.1017/CBO9780511597954
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Sloman, A. (2010). What’s information, for an organism or intelligent machine? How can a machine or organism mean? In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & M. Burgin (Eds.), Information and computation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Stanley, J. (2011). Know how. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695362.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese, 87, 449–508.10.1007/BF00499820
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Tarski, A. (1933). Pojecie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych. Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydzial III Nauk Matematyczno-Fizycznych, (34).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychologial Review, 84(4), 327–352.10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. White, M., & Tarski, A. (1987). A philosophical letter of Alfred Tarski. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(1), 28–32.10.2307/2027134
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Woodward, J. (2001). Law and explanation in biology: Invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 1–20.10.1086/392863
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 88
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
representation,
Hard Problem of Content,
satisfaction conditions,
information
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2015 Marcin Miłkowski, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)Next article