Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago) Cover

The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago)

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2015
References

References

  1. Bartels, A. (2006). Defending the structural concept of representation.,(1), 7–19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bickhard, M. H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines.,(4), 285–333. doi:10.1080/09528139308953775
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Bickhard, M. H. (2008). The interactivist model.,(3), 547–591. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bickhard, M. H., & Richie, D. M. (1983).. New York: Praeger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bielecka, K. (2014). Błędne reprezentacje a pojęcie funkcji w teleosemantyce. Analiza koncepcji Dretskego i Millikan.,(85), 105–120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Brentano, F. (1900).Hamburg: F. Meiner.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Burge, T. (2010).. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, R. J. (2011).. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, L. (1900).. New York: Street & Smith.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Chrudzimski, A. (1999). Die Theorie der Intentionalität bei Franz Brentano.,, 45–66. doi:10.5840/gps1999574
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing?,(3), 401–431. doi:10.1007/BF01063896
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Craik, K. (1967).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, R., & Roth, M. (2012). Meaning and content in cognitive science. In R. Schantz (Ed.),(pp. 365–382). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, D. (1984).. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Decock, L., & Douven, I. (2010). Similarity after Goodman.,(1), 61–75. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Dretske, F. I. (1986). Misrepresentation. In R. Bogdan (Ed.),(pp. 17–37). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Dretske, F. I. (1988).. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Field, H. (1972). Tarski’s theory of truth.,(13), 347–375.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Fodor, J. A. (1992).. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2015)..
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),(pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, N. (1951).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language.,, 90–129. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation.,(2), 135–175.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013).. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kirchhoff, M. D. (2011). Anti-representationalism: Not a well-founded theory of cognition.,, 1–34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. MacKay, D. M. (1969).. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Mendelovici, A. (2012). Reliable misrepresentation and tracking theories of mental representation.,(2), 421–443. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9966-8
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Millikan, R. G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content.,(1), 47–80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Millikan, R. G. (2007). An input condition for teleosemantics? Reply to Shea (and Godfrey-Smith).,(2), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00083.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Miłkowski, M. (2015a). Function and causal relevance of content., 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.003
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Miłkowski, M. (2015b). Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms., (February). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9481-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Newman, M. H. A. (1928). Mr. Russell’s “Causal Theory of Perception”.,(146), 137–148.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Pattee, H. H. (1972). Physical problems of decision-making constraints.,(3), 99–105. doi:10.3109/00207457209147629
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984).. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Ramsey, W. M. (2007).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511597954
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Rorty, R. (1989).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Sloman, A. (2010). What’s information, for an organism or intelligent machine? How can a machine or organism mean? In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & M. Burgin (Eds.),. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Stanley, J. (2011).. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural representation and surrogative reasoning.,, 449–508.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Tarski, A. (1933). Pojecie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych., (34).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.,(4), 327–352.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Weisberg, M. (2013).. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. White, M., & Tarski, A. (1987). A philosophical letter of Alfred Tarski.,(1), 28–32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Woodward, J. (2001). Law and explanation in biology: Invariance is the kind of stability that matters.,(1), 1–20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 88
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
representation,
Hard Problem of Content,
satisfaction conditions,
information
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2015 Marcin Miłkowski, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Previous article
Next article