Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interactivity And Mental Arithmetic: Coupling Mind And World Transforms And Enhances Performance Cover

Interactivity And Mental Arithmetic: Coupling Mind And World Transforms And Enhances Performance

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jul 2015
References

References

  1. Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions.,, 3–34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance.,, 197–205.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Baber, C., Parekh, M., & Cengiz, T. G. (2014). Tool use as distributed cognition: how tools help, hinder and define manual skill.,, Article 116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic?,, 747–756.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. (2010). Material surrogacy and the supernatural: Reflections on the role of artefacts in “off-line” cognition. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.),(pp. 23–28). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic.,, 353–386.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Fu, W., & Gray, W.D. (2000). Memory versus perceptual-motor tradeoffs in a blocks world task.. (pp. 154–159). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind.,, 279–297.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load.,, 516–522.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Gray, W.D., & Fu, W-T. (2004). Soft constraints behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head.,, 359–382.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.),(pp. 21–41). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space.,, 31–68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Kirsh, D. (2013). Thinking with external representation. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.),(pp. 171–194). London: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Magnani, L. (2007). Semiotic brains and artificial minds: How brains make up material cognitive systems. In R. Gudwin & J. Queiroz (Eds.),(pp. 1–41). Hershey: Idea Group.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Malafouris, L. (2013).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Moyer, P.S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics.,, 175–197.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Neth, H., & Payne, S. J. (2001). Addition as Interactive Problem Solving. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.),(pp. 698–703). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Neth, H., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Interactive coin addition: How hands can help us think. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.),(pp. 279–284). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.)(pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press Columbia University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Schiefele, U., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (1995). Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement.,, 163–181.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihaly, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.,, 158–176.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Simon, H.A. (1996).(3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Interactivity, efficiency, and individual differences in mental arithmetic.,, 302–311.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Euden, G., & Hearn, V. (2011). Einstellung defused: Interactivity and mental set.,, 1889–1895.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Sirota, M., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Reducing the impact of math anxiety on mental arithmetic: The importance of distributed cognition.(pp. 3615–3620). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks.,, 87–122.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 59
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
interactivity,
mental arithmetic,
problem solving,
distributed representation,
flow
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2015 Lisa G. Guthrie, Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Previous article
Next article