A nine question logical assessment matrix (9)_
| Q 1: Has there been enough evidence produced to set priorities for the individual goal? |
| Q 2: Were appropriate measures proposed for the individual goal? |
| Q 3: Were proposed measures adopted? |
| Q 4: Were adopted measures implemented? |
| Q 5: Were social inequalities tackled by proposed measures? |
| Q 6: Was at least 50% of the target population reached by the measure? |
| Q 7: Were sufficient financial resources provided for the implementation? |
| Q 8: Were strategic aims of the FNAP in line with implementation goals? |
| Q 9: Were implementation activities in line with the individual goal? |
Criteria for evaluation (9)_
| Considerable success (+) | (4.8-5) |
| Considerable/moderate success | (4.3-4.7) |
| Moderate success (+/0) | (3.8-4.2) |
| Moderate/little success | (3.3-3.7) |
| Little success (0) | (2.8-3.2) |
| Little/minimal success | (2.3-2.7) |
| Minimal success (0/-) | (1.8-2.2) |
| Minimal/no success | (1.3-1.7) |
| No success (-) | (1.2 and less) |
Estimation by pillarsResults are presented in the template generated for the evaluation of the implementation of the Slovenian Food and Nutrition Policy 2005-2010 (ReNPPP 2005-10) (9)__
| Research data available, with priorities Q1 (5.0) | Measures were Proposed Q2 (3.9) | Measures were Adopted Q3 (3.8) | Measures were Implemented Q4 (3.5) | Social inequalities were tackled by the measure Q5 (4.4) | At least 50% of the Target Population was reached by the | Sufficient financial Resources were Provided Q7 (3.4) | Goals are in line with The strategic aim of | Implemented Activities are in line with the goals Q9 (4.6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOOD SAFETY (3.8) | 5.0 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 3.3 | NA | NA | 3.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| 1. Harmonising the legislation with the EU (4.8) | 5.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.5 | NA | NA | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 2. The improvement of food safety control and the establishment of SS (3.6) | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | NA | NA | 3.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| 3. Strengthening food control laboratories (2.7) | 5.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.8 | NA | NA | 1.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| 4. Strengthening technical capacities (4.1) | 5.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 3.8 | NA | NA | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| NUTRITION (4.2) | 5.0 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| 1. The prevention of malnutrition among women: adolescence pregnancy lactation (4.1) | 5.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| 2. Preserving the tradition of breastfeeding, and timely initiation of complementary feeding (4.3) | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 3. The evaluation of the mode of nutrition (4.0) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 4.The evaluation of the nutritional status of the population (4.9) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 5. Determining main risk factors for nutrition-related diseases (4.3) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 6. The eradication of iodine deficiency in the Albanian population (4.7) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| 7. Anaemia prevalence assessment and the prevention of IDA (4.0) | 5.0 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 4.3 |
| 8. The improvement of oral health (3.8) | 5.0 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| 9.The establishment of a national network for M&E of the nutritional status of the population (4.2) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 10. Managing the nutritional education, informing the population on a healthy nutrition and healthy lifestyle (3.7) | 5.0 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 5.0 |
| (i) The compilation of Recommendations for a healthy nutrition and healthy lifestyle (3.9) | 5.0 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| (ii) The preparation of inter-sectorial promotional interventions (4.1) | 5.0 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 5.0 |
| (iii) Strengthening intellectual potential on nutrition (3.2) | 5.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 11.The improvement of legislation for the improvement of a nutrition-related health status (4.7) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Findings from the logical evaluation matrix2_
| FOOD SAFETY | NUTRITION | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| The number of goals | 4 | 11 | |
| Average assessment | Moderate | Moderate | |
| 1 | No success (%) | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Minimal/no success (%) | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Minimal (%) | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Little/Minimal (%) | 25 | 0 |
| 5 | Little (%) | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Moderate/little (%) | 25 | 9 |
| 7 | Moderate (%) | 25 | 46 |
| 8 | Considerable/moderate (%) | 0 | 36 |
| 9 | Considerable (%) | 25 | 9 |
| TOTAL | 100% | 100% |