Table 1
Illicit drug use related behaviours among Romanian university students.
| Behaviour | 1999 | 2003 | 2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | |
| N=120% | N=120% | N=160% | N=160% | N=160% | N=160% | |
| Lifetime use of any illicit drug | ||||||
| Never | 97.5*ab | 85.8b | 92.5*cc | 81.9cc | 85* | 69.4 |
| 1-2 times | 1.7*b | 10 | 4.4* | 11.9 | 7.5* | 15.6 |
| More than 2 times | 0.8*b | 4.2b | 3.1* | 6.2cc | 7.5* | 15 |
| Illicit drug use in the last month | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6cc | 2.5* | 6.2 |
| Lifetime use of different types of illicit drugs | ||||||
| Herbal cannabis/cannabis resin | 2.5*,a,b | 14.2b | 7.5*,cc | 17.5*,cc | 14.4* | 29.4 |
| Cocaine | 0 | 2.4 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 3.7 |
| Amphetamines | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 3.1 |
| Ecstasy | 0b | 0.8a,b | 1.2*,cc | 5c | 5.6* | 11.2 |
| LSD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.5 |
| Heroin | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Lifetime temptation of using illicit drugs among students who never used these substances | 0*b | 3.8b | 2.7*cc | 6.1cc | 7.3* | 11.7 |
| Intention to use illicit drugs in the future among students who never used these substances | ||||||
| Probably yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5cc | 2.9* | 7.6 |
| Definitely yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intention to use illicit drugs in the future among students who declared consumption of these substances at least once during lifetime | ||||||
| Probably yes | 0b | 5.8 | 8.33 | 10.3 | 12.5 | 14.3 |
| Definitely yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2003 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
a statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2003 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
a statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2003 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
b statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 1999 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)
cc statistically significant differences at chi 2 test between the samples from 2003 and 2011 (p<0.05)