References
- 1. R Sheard. Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. Eye 2014; 28(2): 118-125.
- 2. Oslen T. Sources od error in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 125-129.
- 3. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):524-534.
- 4. Fontes BM, Castro E. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial lenth with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2011; 74: 166-170.
- 5. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.
- 6. Oslen T. Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32; 419-424.
- 7. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85.
- 8. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85-88.
- 9. Rose LT, Moshegov Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and Applanation A-Scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(2):121-124.
- 10. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125-129.
- 11. Hollady JT, Prager TC et al. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculation. Arch Ophtalmol 1986; 104: 539-541.
- 12. Oslen T. Theoretical approach to intraocular lens calculation using Gaussian optics. I Cataract Refract Surg 1987; 13: 141-145.
- 13. Findle O. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):61-61.
- 14. Sahin A, Hamrah P. Clinically relevant biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23: 47-53.
- 15. Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: e237-e241.
- 16. M S Rajan, I Keilhorn, J A Bell. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculatios. Eye 2002; 16: 552-556.
- 17. Shammas HJ. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1984;10(4):444-447.
- 18. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(12):1961-1968.
- 19. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 281: 61-5.
- 20. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Heinzl H, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(6):861-867.
- 21. Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(7):929-33.
- 22. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2): 230-4.
- 23. Beatriz Machado Fontes, , Bruno Machado FonteI, Elaine Castro. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. vol.74 no.3 São Paulo May/June 2011.
- 24. Cech R, Utikal T, Juhaszova J. Comparison of optical and ultrasound biometry and assessment of using both methods in practice. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2014 Feb; 70(1): 3-9.
- 25. Goyal R, North RV, Morgan JE. Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 331-335.
- 26. Yang Q, Chen B, Peng, Li Z, Huang Y. Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasoumd biometry in high myopic patients with cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2014 Jan; 50(1): 32-6.
- 27. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15: 425-428.
- 28. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 700-712.
- 29. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14: 17-24.
- 30. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 333-340.
- 31. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.
- 32. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 63-71.