References
- 1. Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(1):1-21.
- 2. Stary A, Stary G. Sexually transmitted infections. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1367-89.
- 3. Ratnam S. The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005;16(1):45-51.
- 4. Ray K, Lahta R, Sachdeva KG, Ganguly DD, Bhargava NC. Screening and confirmation of syphilis by serology - a five year experience. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1991;12:47-50.
- 5. Workowski KA, Berman S, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-12):1-110.
- 6. Geusau A, Kittler H, Hein U, Dangl-Erlach E, Stingl G, Tschachler E. Biological false-positive tests comprise a high proportion of venereal disease research laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16(11):722-6.
- 7. Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic testing for syphilis: benefits and challenges of a reverse algorithm. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 2014;36(24):195-202.
- 8. Janier M, Hegyi V, Dupin N, Unemo M, Tiplica GS, Potočnik M, et al. 2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(12):1581-93.
- 9. Lewis DA, Lukehart SA. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema pallidum: evolution, therapeutic challenges and the need to strengthen global surveillance. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87 Suppl 2:ii39-43.
- 10. Romanowski B, Sutherland R, Fick GH, Mooney D, Love EJ. Serologic response to treatment of infectious syphilis. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(12):1005-9.
- 11. Bosshard PP. Usefulness of IgM-specific enzyme immunoassays for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of three different assays. J Infect. 2013;67(1):35-42.
- 12. Gutierrez J, Vergara MJ, Soto MJ, Piedrola G, Maroto Md. Clinical utility of a competitive ELISA to detect antibodies against Treponema pallidum. J Clin Lab Anal. 2000;14(2):83-6.
- 13. Sena AC, White BL, Sparling PF. Novel Treponema pallidum serologic tests: a paradigm shift in syphilis screening for the 21st century. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(6):700–8.
- 14. Hagedorn HJ. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. In: Gross G, Tyring SK, editors. Sexually transmitted infections and sexually transmitted diseases. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 143-50.
- 15. Kingston M, French P, Goh B, Goold P, Higgins S, Sukthankar A, et al. UK National Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis 2008. Int J STD AIDS. 2008;19(11):729–40.
- 16. Tucker JD, Bu J, Brown LB, Yin YP, Chen XS, Cohen MS. Accelerating worldwide syphilis screening through rapid testing: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(6):381-6.
- 17. Zanto SN. Changing algorithms in syphilis laboratory diagnosis. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 2010;32(8):59-64.
- 18. Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Peterman TA, Ballard RC. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(1):1–7.
- 19. Binnicker MJ. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(1):79-85.
- 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening: four laboratories, New York City, 2005–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(32):872–5.
- 21. Tong ML, Lin LR, Liu LL, Zhang HL, Huang SJ, Chen YY, et al. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(8):1116–24.
- 22. Jost H, Castro A, Cox D, Fakile Y, Kikkert S, Tun Y, et al. A comparison of the analytical level of agreement of nine treponemal assays for syphilis and possible implications for screening algorithms. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003347.
- 23. Malm K, Andersson S, Fredlund H, Norrgren H, Biague A, Mansson F, et al. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(12):2369-76.
- 24. Gayet-Ageron A, Ninet B, Toutous-Trellu L, Lautenschlager S, Furrer H, Piguet V, et al. Assessment of a real-time PCR test to diagnose syphilis from diverse biological samples. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85(4):264–9.
- 25. Castro AR, Mody HC, Parab SY, Patel MT, Kikkert SE, Park MM, et al. An immunofiltration device for the simultaneous detection of non-treponemal and treponemal antibodies in patients with syphilis. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(7):532–6.
- 26. Brown ST, Zaidi A, Larsen SA, Reynolds GH. Serological response to syphilis treatment. A new analysis of old data. JAMA. 1985;253(9):1296-9.
- 27. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-6):1-78.
- 28. Wicher K, Horowitz HW, Wicher V. Laboratory methods of diagnosis of syphilis for the beginning of the third millennium. Microbes Infect. 1999;1(12):1035-49.
- 29. Farhi D, Dupin N. Origins of syphilis and management in the immunocompetent patient: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28(5):533–8.
- 30. Smith NH, Musher DM, Huang DB, Rodriguez PS, Dowell ME, Ace W, et al. Response of HIV-infected patients with asymptomatic syphilis to intensive intramuscular therapy with ceftriaxone or procaine penicillin. Int J STD AIDS. 2004;15(5):328-32.
- 31. Larsen SA, Hambie EA, Wobig GH, Kennedy EJ. Cerebrospinal serologic test for syphilis: treponemal and nontreponemal tests. In: Morisett R, Kurstak E, editors. Advances in sexually transmitted diseases. Utrecht: VNU Science Press; 1985. p. 157-62.
- 32. Luger AF, Schmidt BL, Kaulich M. Significance of laboratory findings for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11(4):224-34.