References
- 1. Attfield, R. Beyond Anthropocentrism, In A. O’Hear (ed.), Philosophy and the Environment, Cambridge 2011.
- 2. Baker, L.R. The Ontology of Artifacts, Philosophical Explorations, 7(2), 2004.10.1080/13869790410001694462
- 3. Baker, L.R. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.
- 4. Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham – London: Duke University Press, 2010.
- 5. Benso, S. The Face of Things: A Different Side of Ethics, New York: SUNY, 2000.
- 6. Bińczyk, E. Posthumanist Tendencies in Science and Technology Studies, Political Dialogues. Journal of Biopolitics and Contemporary Politcal Theories, 15, 2013.
- 7. Blok, V. Heidegger’s Ontology of Work, Heidegger Studies, 31, 2015.
- 8. Braidotti, R. The Posthuman, Malden: Polity, 2013.
- 9. Devall, B. Simple in Means, Rich in Ends. Practicing Deep Ecology, Salt Lake City, 1988.
- 10. Goodpaster, K. On Being Morally Considerable, Journal of Philosophy, 75 (6), 1978,
- 11. Goodpaster, K. On Stopping at Everything: A Reply to W. M. Hunt, Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 1980.
- 12. Gunkel, D. A Vindication of the Rights of Machines, Philosophy & Technology, 27 (1), 2012.
- 13. Hale, B. Technology, the Environment and the Moral Considerability of Artefacts, In J.K.B. Olsen, E. Selinegr & S. Riis (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
- 14. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Actions versus Functions: A Plea For an Alternative Metaphysics of Artifacts, Monist, 87, 2004.
- 15. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Produced to Use: Combining Two Key Intuitions on the Nature of Artefacts, Techne, 13 (2), 2009.
- 16. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Contemporary Engineering and the Metaphysics of Artefacts: Beyond the Artisan Model, The Monist, 92 (3), 2009.
- 17. Hullinger, J. Ikea Wants You To Stop Throwing Away Your Ikea Furniture, [online:] http://www.fastcompany.com/3055971/most–creative–people/ikea–wants–you–to–stop–throwing–away–your–ikea–furniture, 2015.
- 18. Hunt, W. M. Are Mere Things Morally Considerable? Environmental Ethics, 2(3), 1980.
- 19. Ihde, D. Expanding Hermeneutics, Evanston: Fordham UP, 1998.
- 20. Ihde, D. Postphenomenology, Evanston: Fordham UP, 1993.
- 21. Introna, L. Ethics and Speaking of Things, Theory, Culture & Society, 3, 2009.
- 22. Katayama, E. Aristotle on Artifacts: a Metaphysical Puzzle, Albany: SUNY, 1999.
- 23. Katz, E. Understanding Moral Limits in the Duality of Artifacts and Nature: A Reply to Critics, Ethics & the Environment, 1, 2002.
- 24. Katz, E. Further Adventures in the Case Against Restoration, Environmental Ethics, 1, 2012.
- 25. Katz, E. Artefacts and Functions: A Note on the Value of Nature, Environmental Values, 2, 1993.
- 26. Kennedy, G. An Ontology of Trash. The Disposable and Its Problematic Nature, Albany: SUNY, 2012.
- 27. Kiepas A. Człowiek wobec dylematów filozofii techniki, Katowice: Wyd. UŚ, 2000.
- 28. Kim, J. Phenomenogy of Digital-Being, Human Studies, no. 24, 2001.
- 29. King, R. 2002. Environmental Ethics and the Built Environment, Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 2002, pp. 115–131.
- 30. Kotarbinski, T. Fazy rozwojowe konkretyzmu, Studia Filozoficzne, 1, 1958, pp. 228–236.
- 31. Kotarbinski, T. Zasadnicze myśli pansomatyzmu, Przegląd Filozoficzny, 33, 1934, pp. 283–294.
- 32. Kozłowski, J. O reizmie somatycznym Tadeusza Kotarbinskiego, Studia Humanistyczne Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej. Prace Filozoficzne, 27, 1985, pp. 28–39.
- 33. Lee, K. The Natural and the Artefactual. The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental Phislosophy, Lanham – Boulder – New York – Oxford: Lexington Books, 1999.
- 34. Lizut, R. A. Technika a wartości. Spór o aksjologiczą neutralność artefaktów, Lublin: Academicon, 2014.
- 35. Maskit, J. Deep Ecology and Desire: On Naess and the Problem of Consumption, In E. Katz, A. Light, D. Rothenberg (eds.), Beneath the Surface. Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology, Cambridge – London: MIT Press, 2000.
- 36. Morito, B. Intrinsic Value: A Modern Albatross for the Ecological Approach, Environmental Values, 12: 2003, pp. 317–336.10.3197/096327103129341342
- 37. Naess, A. The Deep Ecology Movement, G. Sessions (ed.), In Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Boston – London, 1995.
- 38. Newman, L. & Dale, A. Celebrating the Mundane: Nature and the Built Environment, Environmental Values, 22: 2013, pp. 401–413.10.3197/096327113X13648087563827
- 39. Norton, B. Convergence, Noninstrumental Value and the Semantics of ‘Love’: Comment on McShane, Environmental Values, 17, 2008, pp. 5–14.
- 40. Ouderkirk, W. Katz’s Problematic Dualism and its “Seismic” Effects on His Theory, Ethics & the Environment, 7(1), 2002, pp. 124–137.
- 41. Piątek, Z. Aspekty antropocentryzmu, Kraków: Wyd. UJ, 1988.
- 42. Piątek, Z. Etyka środowiskowa. Nowe spojrzenie na miejsce człowieka w przyrodzie, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 1998.
- 43. Przybysz, A. Raport: czas użytkowania lodówek i telewizorów coraz krótszy. Wina producentów? Gazeta Wyborcza, 15.04.2015.
- 44. Thompson, I. Landscape and Environmental Ethics, In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
- 45. Tymieniecka-Suchanek, J. (ed.). 2014 Człowiek w relacji do zwierząt, roślin i maszyn w kulturze. Od humanizmu do posthumanizmu, t. 1–2, Katowice: Wyd. UŚ, 2014.
- 46. Verbeek, P.-P. What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, University Park: Penn State UP, 2005.
- 47. Vermaas P., Kroes P., & Franssen M. A Philosophy of Technology: From Technical Artefacts to Sociotechnical Systems, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011.
- 48. Vogel, S. Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature, Environmental Ethics, 24(1), 2002.
- 49. Vogel, S. The Nature of Artfiacts, Environmental Ethics, 25(2), 2003.
- 50. Vogel, S. Thinking like a Mall, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.