References
- 1. Brandom, R. Asserting, Noûs, 17 (4), 1983, pp. 637–650.
- 2. Brandom, R. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
- 3. Brandom, R. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
- 4. Brandom, R. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
- 5. Díez, G. F. Kolmogorov, heyting and gentzen on the intuitionistic logical constants, Critica, 32 (96), 2000, pp. 43–57.
- 6. Dubucs, J. Feasibility in logic, Synthese, 132(3), 2002, pp. 213–237.
- 7. Dubucs, J. and, Marion, M. Radical anti-realism and substructural logics. In A. Rojszczak, J. Cachro, and G. Kurczewski (eds.), Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, pp. 235–249.
- 8. Dummett, M. Truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59(1), 1959, pp. 141–62.
- 9. Dummett, M. What is a theory of meaning? (ii). In. G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
- 10. Dummett, M. A. E. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
- 11. Dummett, M. A. E. Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
- 12. Dummett, M. A E. Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- 13. Edgington, D. On conditionals, Mind, 104(414), 1995, pp. 235–329.
- 14. Edgington, D. Conditionals, Truth and Assertion. In. I. Ravenscroft (ed.), Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes From the Philosophy of Frank Jackson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
- 15. Girard, J.-Y. On the meaning of logical rules i: syntax versus semantics. In. U. Berger, H. Schwichtenberg (eds.), Computational Logic, NATO ASI Series, vol 165. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 215–272.
- 16. Heyting, A. Intuitionism, Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1971.
- 17. Humberstone, L. The Connectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.
- 18. Lecomte, A. Ludics, dialogue and inferentialism, Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 8(1), 2013.
- 19. MacFarlane, J. What is assertion? In. J. Brown and H. Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
- 20. Marion, M. Why play logical games? In. O. Majer, A.-V. Pietarinen, and T. Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2009, pp. 3–26.
- 21. Marion, M. Game semantics and the manifestation thesis. In. Rahman, Shahid, Primiero, Giuseppe, Marion, Mathieu (Eds.). The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics, Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp. 141–168.
- 22. Per Martin-Löf. On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 1996, pp. 11–60.
- 23. Martino, E. and Usberti, G. Temporal and atemporal truth in intuitionistic mathematics, Topoi, 13(2), 1994, pp. 83–92.
- 24. Murzi, J. Knowability and Bivalence: Intuitionistic Solutions to the Paradox of Knowability, Philosophical Studies, 149(2), 2010, pp. 269–281.
- 25. Novaes, C. D. A dialogical, multiagent account of the normativity of logic, Dialectica, 69(4), 2015, pp. 587–609.
- 26. Nunberg, G. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(2), 1979, pp. 143–184.
- 27. Pagin, P. Assertion, inference, and consequence. Synthese, 187(3), 2012, pp. 869–885.
- 28. Pagin, P. Assertion. In. P. Pagin (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015.
- 29. Pagin, P. Problems with norms of assertion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(2), 2015.
- 30. Peirce, Ch. S. Belief and judgment, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss. Collected papers, vol. 5, 1934, pp. 376–87.
- 31. Prawitz, D. Meaning approached via proofs, Synthese, 148(3), 2006, pp. 507–524.
- 32. Quine, W. V. Methods of Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
- 33. Ramsey, F. General propositions and causality. In. D. H. Mellor (ed.), Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 145–163.
- 34. Read, S. Proof-theoretic validity. In. C. Caret and O. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
- 35. Rescorla, M. Assertion and its constitutive norms, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(1), 2009, pp. 98–130.
- 36. Sanford, D. H. If P, Then Q: Conditionals and the Foundations of Reasoning, London: Routledge, 2004.
- 37. Shieh, S. On the conceptual foundations of anti-realism, Synthese, 115(1), 1998, pp. 33–70.
- 38. Stalnaker, R. Conditional propositions and conditional assertions, In. A. Egan and B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
- 39. Sundholm, G. Constructions, proofs and the meaning of logical constants, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 12(2), 1983, pp. 151–172.
- 40. Trafford, J. Meaning in dialogue: An interactive approach to logic and reasoning, vol. 33, Berlin: Springer, 2016.
- 41. Tranchini, L. Proof-theoretic semantics, paradoxes and the distinction between sense and denotation, Journal of Logic and Computation, 2014.
- 42. Watson, G. Asserting and promising, Philosophical Studies, 117(1-2), 2004, pp. 57–77.
- 43. Weiner, M. Must we know what we say? Philosophical Review, 114(2), 2005, pp. 227–251.
- 44. Williamson, T. Knowing and asserting, Philosophical Review, 105(4):489–523, 1996.
- 45. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations, 4th Edition, transl. by Hacker and Schulte, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.