References
- 1. Alston, William P. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cornell University Press: Ithaca (N.Y.), 1991.
- 2. Barrett, Justin L. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Altamira Press: Walnut Creek, 2004.
- 3. Barrett, Justin L. Is the Spell Really Broken? Biopsychological Explanations of Religion and Theistic Belief. Theology and Science, 5, 2007, pp. 57-72.
- 4. Barrett, Justin L. Born Believers: The Science of Children's Religious Belief. Free Press: New York, 2012.
- 5. Barrett, Justin L., Church, Ian M. Should CSR Give Atheists Epistemic Assurance? On Beergoggles, BFFs, and Skepticism Regarding Religious Belief. The Monist, 96, 2013, pp. 311-324.
- 6. Bary, P. de. Thomas Reid and Scepticism. His Reliabilist Response. Routledge: London, 2002.
- 7. Bering, J. The Existential Theory of Mind. Review of General Psychology, 6, 2002, pp. 3-24.
- 8. Bering, J. The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life. Nicholas Brealey Publishing: London, 2012.
- 9. Bering, J., Bjorklund, D. F. The Natural Emergence of Reasoning About the Afterlife as a Developmental Regularity. Developmental Psychology, 40, 2004, pp. 217-234.
- 10. Bering, J., Blasi, C. H., Bjorklund, D. F. The Development of ‘Afterlife’ Beliefs in Religiously and Secularly Schooled Children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 2005, pp. 587-607.
- 11. Bloom, P. Religion is Natural. Developmental Science, 10, 2007, pp. 147-151.
- 12. Boyer, P. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. Vintage: London, 2002.
- 13. Casler, K., Kelemen, D. Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning About Nature Among Romanian Romani Adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9, 2008, pp. 340-362.
- 14. Clark, K.J., Barrett, J.L. Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Faith and Philosophy, 27, 2010.
- 15. Clark, K.J., Barrett, J.L. Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Journal of the American academy of religion, 2011, pp. 1-37.
- 16. Dawes, G.W., Jong, J. Defeating the Christian's Claim to Warrant. Philo, 15, 2013, pp. 127-44.
- 17. Dawes, G.W., Maclaurin, J. A New Science of Religion, Routledge: London, 2012.
- 18. De Cruz, H., De Smedt, J. A Natural History of Natural Theology. The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. MIT Press: Cambridge (MA) London, 2015.
- 19. Foster, J. A. The Immaterial Self: A Defense of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of Mind. Routledge: London, 1991.
- 20. Granqvist, P., Kirkpatrick, L. A. Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In. I. J. Cassidy, P. R. Shaver (eds.). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford: New York, 2008, pp. 906-933.
- 21. Granqvist, P., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. Religion as Attachment: Normative Processes and Individual Differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 2010, pp. 49-59.
- 22. Gray, K., Waytz, A., Young, L. The Moral Dyad: A Fundamental Template Unifying Moral Judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 2012, pp. 206-215.
- 23. Gray, K., Wegner, D. M. Blaming God for Our Pain: Human Suffering and the Divine Mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 2010, pp. 7-16.
- 24. Horst, S. Notions of Intuition in Cognitive Science of Religion. The Monist, (3) 96, 2013, pp. 377-398.
- 25. Hume, D. The Natural History of Religion. Clarendon: Oxford, 1976.
- 26. Jong, J. How Not to Criticize the (Evolutionary) Cognitive Science of Religion. 2014. http://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/criticize-evolutionary-cognitive-science_religion/ [09/07/2015].
- 27. Jong, J., Kavanagh, Ch., Visala, A. Born idolaters: The limits of the philosophical implications of the cognitivescience of religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 57, 2015, pp. 244-66.
- 28. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin: London, 2012.
- 29. Kelemen, D. The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children. Cognition, 70, 1999, pp. 241-272.
- 30. Kelemen, D. Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature. Psychological Science, 15, 2004, pp. 295-301.
- 31. Kirkpatrick, L. A. Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion. Guilford Press: New York, London, 2005.
- 32. Marsh, J. Darwin and the Problem of Natural Nonbelief. The Monist, 96, 2013, pp. 349-376.
- 33. McCauley, R. N. Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not. Oxford University Press, 2011.
- 34. Murray, M., Goldberg, A. Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: Explaining and Explaining Away. In. J. Schloss, M. Murray (eds.). The Believing Primate. Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 179-199.
- 35. Nola, R. Do Naturalistic Explanations of Religious Beliefs Debunk Religion? In. G. W. Dawes, J. Maclaurin (eds.). A New Science of Religion. Routledge: New York London, 2013.
- 36. Norenzayan, A. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton University Press: Princeton New Jersey, 2013.
- 37. Plantinga, A. Is Belief in God Properly Basic? Noûs, 15, 1981, pp. 41-51.
- 38. Plantinga, A. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press: New York, 1993.
- 39. Plantinga, A. Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
- 40. Schloss, J., Murray, M. J. The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press: New York, 2009.
- 41. Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A. God Is Watching You: Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior In an Anonymous Economic Game. Psychological Science, 18, 2007, pp. 803-809.
- 42. Swinburne, R. Substance Dualism. Faith and Philosophy, 26, 2009, pp. 501-513.
- 43. Van Woudenberg, R. Perceptual Relativism, Scepticism, and Thomas Reid. Reid Studies, 3, 2000, pp. 65-90.
- 44. Wilkins, J. S., Griffiths, P. E. Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Three Domains. In. G. W. Dawes, J. Maclaurin (eds.). A New Science of Religion. Routledge: London, 2012.