The Swarm Computing Approach to Business Intelligence

Andrew Schumann; Krzysztof Pancerz; Andrzej Szelc

doi:10.1515/sh-2015-0019

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

The Swarm Computing Approach to Business Intelligence

Studia Humana

Volume 4 (2015): Issue 3 (July 2015)

By: Andrew Schumann, Krzysztof Pancerz and Andrzej Szelc

Open Access

|Jan 2016

Abstract

We have proposed to use some features of swarm behaviours in modelling business processes. Due to these features we deal with a propagation of business processes in all accessible directions. This propagation is involved into our formalization instead of communicating sequential processes. As a result, we have constructed a business process diagram language based on the swarm behavior and an extension of that language in the form of reflexive management language.

References

1. Aalst, W.M.P. van der, Hofstede, A.H.M. ter, Kiepuszewski, B., and Barros, A. P. Workflow Patterns, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(3), July 2003, 5-51.10.1023/A:1022883727209
Search in Google Scholar
2. Adamatzky, A. Physarum Machines: Computers from Slime Mould. World Scientific, 2010.10.1142/7968
Search in Google Scholar
3. Adamatzky, A., Erokhin, V., Grube, M., Schubert, Th., Schumann A. Physarum Chip Project: Growing Computers From Slime Mould, International Journal of Unconventional Computing, 8(4), 2012, 319-323.
Search in Google Scholar
4. Ammarguellat, Z. A control-flow normalization algorithm and its complexity. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 18(3), 1992, 237-251.10.1109/32.126773
Search in Google Scholar
5. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., and Rosemann, M. (eds.). Process Management. A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer-Verlag, 2003.10.1007/978-3-540-24798-2
Search in Google Scholar
6. Brambilla, M., Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., and Manolescu, I. Process modeling in web applications, ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 15(4), 2006, 360-409.10.1145/1178625.1178627
Search in Google Scholar
7. Desel, J., and Esparza, J. (eds.). Free Choice Petri Nets, volume 40 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.10.1017/CBO9780511526558
Search in Google Scholar
8. Gardner, T. UML Modelling of Automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL4WS. In: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Object Orientation and Web Services. Springer, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Johnson, R., Pearson, D., and Pingali, K. The Program Structure Tree: Computing control regions in linear time. [in:] Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), Orlando FL, USA, ACM Press, June 1994, 171-185.10.1145/773473.178258
Search in Google Scholar
10. Jordan, D., and Evdemon, J. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Committee Specification. OASIS WS-BPEL TC, January 2007. Available via http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/22475/wsbpel-v2.0-CS01.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar
11. Kiepuszewski, B., Hofstede, A.H.M. ter, and Aalst, W.M.P. van der. Fundamentals of control flow in workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3), 2003, 143-209.10.1007/s00236-002-0105-4
Search in Google Scholar
12. Pancerz, K., Schumann, A. Principles of an Object-Oriented Programming Language for Physarum Polycephalum Computing. [in:] Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies (DT’2014), Zilina, Slovak Republic, July 9-11, 2014, 273-280.10.1109/DT.2014.6868725
Search in Google Scholar
13. Rosemann, M. Preparation of Process Modeling. In J. Becker, M. Kugeler, and M. Rosemann, (eds.). Process Management. A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, pages 41–78. Springer-Verlag, 2003.10.1007/978-3-540-24798-2_3
Search in Google Scholar
14. Schumann, A. Towards context-based concurrent formal theories, Parallel Processing Letters, 25, 2015, 1540008.10.1142/S0129626415400083
Search in Google Scholar
15. Schumann, A., Pancerz, K. Towards an Object-Oriented Programming Language for Physarum Polycephalum Computing. [in:] Szczuka, M., Czaja, L., Kacprzak, M. (eds.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming (CS&P’2013), Warsaw, Poland, September 25-27, 2013, 389-397.
Search in Google Scholar
16. Schumann, A., Pancerz, K. Timed Transition System Models for Programming Physarum Machines: Extended Abstract. [in:] Popova-Zeugmann, L. (ed.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming (CS&P’2014), Chemnitz, Germany, September 29 - October 1, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar
17. Schumann, A., Pancerz, K. Roughness in Timed Transition Systems Modeling Propagation of Plasmodium. [in:] Ciucci, D. et al. (eds.). Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9436, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-25754-9_42
Search in Google Scholar
18. Zhao, W., Hauser, R., Bhattacharya, K., Bryant, B.R., and Cao, F. Compiling business processes: untangling unstructured loops in irreducible flow graphs, Int. Journal of Web and Grid Services, 2(1), 2006, 68-91.10.1504/IJWGS.2006.008880
Search in Google Scholar

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2015-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2299-0518

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 41 - 50

Published on: Jan 6, 2016

Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

swarm intelligence,

emergency,

unconventional computing

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Political economics,

Political economics, other,

Mathematics,

Logic and set theory,

Philosophy,

Philosophy, other

© 2016 Andrew Schumann, Krzysztof Pancerz, Andrzej Szelc, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 4 (2015): Issue 3 (July 2015)