Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Salva Phaenomenis. Phenomenological Dimension of Subjectivity in the Frame of the Reductionist Paradigm of the Cognitive Sciences

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. 1. Arendt, H. The Conquest of Space and the Stature of Man. The New Atlantis. Number 18, Fall 2007, 43-55.
  2. 2. Auyang, S.Y. Mind in Everyday Life and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.10.7551/mitpress/4628.001.0001
  3. 3. Bogen, J. 'Saving the phenomena' and saving the phenomena. Synthese 182 (1), 2011, 7-22.10.1007/s11229-009-9619-4
  4. 4. Dennett, D. Consciousness explained. Penguin, London, 1991.
  5. 5. Drummond, J.J. Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 57-74.10.1007/s11097-006-9037-8
  6. 6. Duhem, P. To save the phenomena. Dolan, E. and Maschler C. (transl.), Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1969.10.7208/chicago/9780226381657.001.0001
  7. 7. Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. The Phenomenological Mind. London, Routledge, 2012.10.4324/9780203126752
  8. 8. Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Research: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F. (tranls.), Dordrecht, Springer, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
  9. 9. Husserl, E. Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. [in:] Husserl E., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Laurer, Q. (transl.), Harper & Row/Torchbook, New York 1965, 49-192.
  10. 10. Klawiter, A. Thinking like a philosopher, arguing like a cognitive scientist. Diametros 3, 2005, 176-181. (in polish)
  11. 11. Klawiter, A. Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82, 2004, 253-271.10.1163/9789004333215_013
  12. 12. Kosman, A. Saving the Phenomena. Realism and Instrumentalism in Aristotle's Theory of Science. [in:] Kosman, A. Virtues of Thought. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 2014, 138-156.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437.c8
  13. 13. Liu, C. A Study of Model and Representation Based on Duhemian Thesis. [in:] Magnani, L. and Li, P. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2012, 115-142.
  14. 14. Marbach, E. No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: Variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 6, 2007, 75-87.10.1007/s11097-006-9027-x
  15. 15. Meixner, U. Materialism Does not Save the Phenomena – and the Alternative Which Does. [in:] Koons, R.C. and Bealer, G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, 417-437.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0021
  16. 16. McGinn, C. Can we Solve the Mind Body Problem? Mind 98 (1989), nr 891, 349-366.10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349
  17. 17. Miah, A. The Deep Blue Grasshopper: Playing Games with Artificial Intelligence. [in:] Hale, B. (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago, Open Court, 2008, 13-23.
  18. 18. Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Experience. Fischer, A.L. (transl.), Beacon Press, Boston, 1963.
  19. 19. Owen, G.E.L. Tithenai ta Phenomena. [in:] Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problemes de la methode. Publications Universitaries, Lovain, 1961, 113-126.
  20. 20. Rinofner-Kriedl, S. What is Wrong with Naturalizing Epistemology? A Phenomenologist's Reply. [in:] Feist, R. (ed.) Husserl and the Sciences. Selected Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2010, 41-68.
  21. 21. Roy, J.M. Saving the intentional phenomena: Intentionality, Representation, and Symbol, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 111-147.10.1515/9781503617421-006
  22. 22. Roy, J.M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. J. and Roy, M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 1-83.10.1515/9781503617421-004
  23. 23. Searle, J. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001
  24. 24. Spiegelberg, H. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, 1965, vol. II.10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8
  25. 25. Stalnaker, R. Varieties of Supervenience. [in:] Stalnaker, R. Ways a World Might Be, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, 86-108.10.1093/0199251487.003.0006
  26. 26. Weizsäcker, C.F.v. Deutlichkeit. Hanser, München, 1978.
  27. 27. Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F.C. (ed.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999.10.7551/mitpress/4660.001.0001
  28. 28. van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
  29. 29. van Fraassen, B. To save the Phenomena. Journal of Philosophy, 73 (18), 1976, 623-632.10.2307/2025818
  30. 30. Varela, F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3/4, 1996, 330-49.
  31. 31. Zahavi, D. Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3/4, 2004, 331-347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
  32. 32. Zahavi, D. Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.
  33. 33. Zahavi, D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 21-43.10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 12
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Filip Kobiela, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.