Salva Phaenomenis. Phenomenological Dimension of Subjectivity in the Frame of the Reductionist Paradigm of the Cognitive Sciences

Filip Kobiela

doi:10.1515/sh-2015-0011

References

1. Arendt, H. The Conquest of Space and the Stature of Man. The New Atlantis. Number 18, Fall 2007, 43-55.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Auyang, S.Y. Mind in Everyday Life and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.10.7551/mitpress/4628.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
3. Bogen, J. 'Saving the phenomena' and saving the phenomena. Synthese 182 (1), 2011, 7-22.10.1007/s11229-009-9619-4
Search in Google Scholar
4. Dennett, D. Consciousness explained. Penguin, London, 1991.
Search in Google Scholar
5. Drummond, J.J. Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 57-74.10.1007/s11097-006-9037-8
Search in Google Scholar
6. Duhem, P. To save the phenomena. Dolan, E. and Maschler C. (transl.), Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1969.10.7208/chicago/9780226381657.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
7. Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. The Phenomenological Mind. London, Routledge, 2012.10.4324/9780203126752
Search in Google Scholar
8. Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Research: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F. (tranls.), Dordrecht, Springer, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
Search in Google Scholar
9. Husserl, E. Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. [in:] Husserl E., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Laurer, Q. (transl.), Harper & Row/Torchbook, New York 1965, 49-192.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Klawiter, A. Thinking like a philosopher, arguing like a cognitive scientist. Diametros 3, 2005, 176-181. (in polish)
Search in Google Scholar
11. Klawiter, A. Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82, 2004, 253-271.10.1163/9789004333215_013
Search in Google Scholar
12. Kosman, A. Saving the Phenomena. Realism and Instrumentalism in Aristotle's Theory of Science. [in:] Kosman, A. Virtues of Thought. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 2014, 138-156.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437.c8
Search in Google Scholar
13. Liu, C. A Study of Model and Representation Based on Duhemian Thesis. [in:] Magnani, L. and Li, P. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2012, 115-142.
Search in Google Scholar
14. Marbach, E. No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: Variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 6, 2007, 75-87.10.1007/s11097-006-9027-x
Search in Google Scholar
15. Meixner, U. Materialism Does not Save the Phenomena – and the Alternative Which Does. [in:] Koons, R.C. and Bealer, G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, 417-437.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0021
Search in Google Scholar
16. McGinn, C. Can we Solve the Mind Body Problem? Mind 98 (1989), nr 891, 349-366.10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349
Search in Google Scholar
17. Miah, A. The Deep Blue Grasshopper: Playing Games with Artificial Intelligence. [in:] Hale, B. (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago, Open Court, 2008, 13-23.
Search in Google Scholar
18. Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Experience. Fischer, A.L. (transl.), Beacon Press, Boston, 1963.
Search in Google Scholar
19. Owen, G.E.L. Tithenai ta Phenomena. [in:] Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problemes de la methode. Publications Universitaries, Lovain, 1961, 113-126.
Search in Google Scholar
20. Rinofner-Kriedl, S. What is Wrong with Naturalizing Epistemology? A Phenomenologist's Reply. [in:] Feist, R. (ed.) Husserl and the Sciences. Selected Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2010, 41-68.
Search in Google Scholar
21. Roy, J.M. Saving the intentional phenomena: Intentionality, Representation, and Symbol, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 111-147.10.1515/9781503617421-006
Search in Google Scholar
22. Roy, J.M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. J. and Roy, M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 1-83.10.1515/9781503617421-004
Search in Google Scholar
23. Searle, J. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
24. Spiegelberg, H. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, 1965, vol. II.10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8
Search in Google Scholar
25. Stalnaker, R. Varieties of Supervenience. [in:] Stalnaker, R. Ways a World Might Be, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, 86-108.10.1093/0199251487.003.0006
Search in Google Scholar
26. Weizsäcker, C.F.v. Deutlichkeit. Hanser, München, 1978.
Search in Google Scholar
27. Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F.C. (ed.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999.10.7551/mitpress/4660.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
28. van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
29. van Fraassen, B. To save the Phenomena. Journal of Philosophy, 73 (18), 1976, 623-632.10.2307/2025818
Search in Google Scholar
30. Varela, F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3/4, 1996, 330-49.
Search in Google Scholar
31. Zahavi, D. Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3/4, 2004, 331-347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
Search in Google Scholar
32. Zahavi, D. Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.
Search in Google Scholar
33. Zahavi, D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 21-43.10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7
Search in Google Scholar