6. Duhem, P. To save the phenomena. Dolan, E. and Maschler C. (transl.), Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1969.10.7208/chicago/9780226381657.001.0001
8. Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Research: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F. (tranls.), Dordrecht, Springer, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
9. Husserl, E. Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. [in:] Husserl E., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Laurer, Q. (transl.), Harper & Row/Torchbook, New York 1965, 49-192.
11. Klawiter, A. Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82, 2004, 253-271.10.1163/9789004333215_013
12. Kosman, A. Saving the Phenomena. Realism and Instrumentalism in Aristotle's Theory of Science. [in:] Kosman, A. Virtues of Thought. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 2014, 138-156.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437.c8
13. Liu, C. A Study of Model and Representation Based on Duhemian Thesis. [in:] Magnani, L. and Li, P. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2012, 115-142.
14. Marbach, E. No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: Variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 6, 2007, 75-87.10.1007/s11097-006-9027-x
15. Meixner, U. Materialism Does not Save the Phenomena – and the Alternative Which Does. [in:] Koons, R.C. and Bealer, G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, 417-437.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0021
17. Miah, A. The Deep Blue Grasshopper: Playing Games with Artificial Intelligence. [in:] Hale, B. (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago, Open Court, 2008, 13-23.
19. Owen, G.E.L. Tithenai ta Phenomena. [in:] Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problemes de la methode. Publications Universitaries, Lovain, 1961, 113-126.
20. Rinofner-Kriedl, S. What is Wrong with Naturalizing Epistemology? A Phenomenologist's Reply. [in:] Feist, R. (ed.) Husserl and the Sciences. Selected Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2010, 41-68.
22. Roy, J.M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. J. and Roy, M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 1-83.10.1515/9781503617421-004
25. Stalnaker, R. Varieties of Supervenience. [in:] Stalnaker, R. Ways a World Might Be, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, 86-108.10.1093/0199251487.003.0006
31. Zahavi, D. Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3/4, 2004, 331-347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
33. Zahavi, D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 21-43.10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7