Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Detecting differential viability selection between environments by analysis of compositional differentiation at different levels of genetic integration Cover

Detecting differential viability selection between environments by analysis of compositional differentiation at different levels of genetic integration

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Antao T, A Lopes, RJ Lopes, A Beja-Pereira and G Luikart (2008) LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9:323. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-32310.1186/1471-2105-9-323
  2. Beaumont MA and RA Nichols (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263(1377)1619-1626. https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.023710.1098/rspb.1996.0237
  3. Flanagan SP and AG Jones (2015) Identifying signatures of sexual selection using genomewide selection components analysis. Ecology and Evolution 5(13):2722-2744. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.154610.1002/ece3.1546
  4. Foll M and O Gaggiotti (2008) A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180(2):977-993.10.1534/genetics.108.092221
  5. Gillet EM (2013) DifferInt : compositional differentiation among populations at three levels of genetic integration. Molecular Ecology Resources 13(5):953-964. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.1214510.1111/1755-0998.12145
  6. Gillet EM and H-R Gregorius (2008) Measuring differentiation among populations at different levels of genetic integration. BMC Genetics 9:60.10.1186/1471-2156-9-60
  7. Gillet EM, H-R Gregorius and M Ziehe (2004) May inclusion of trait differences in genetic cluster analysis alter our views? Forest Ecology and Management 197(1-3):149-158.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.010
  8. Gregorius H-R (1974) On the concept of genetic distance between populations based on gene frequencies. In: Department of Forest Genetics, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm (ed) Proceedings of the IRUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties on Population and Ecological Genetics, Breeding Theory and Progeny Testing, S.02-04. Stockholm, pp 17-22. http://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/document/download/9afb2d3c2d8aee7036cc05d475cd5a64.pdf/017-Gregorius-IUFRO-1974.pdf
  9. Gregorius H-R (1984) A unique genetic distance. Biometrical Journal 26(1):13-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.471026010310.1002/bimj.4710260103
  10. Gregorius H-R (2011) The analysis of association between traits when differences between trait states matter. Acta Biotheoretica 59(3-4):213-229. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9138-910.1007/s10441-011-9138-9
  11. Gregorius H-R (1991) On the concept of effective number. Theoretical Population Biology 40(2):269-283.10.1016/0040-5809(91)90056-L
  12. Gregorius H-R, B Degen and A König (2007) Problems in the analysis of genetic differentiation among populations – a case study in Quercus robur. Silvae Genetica 56(3-4):190-199. https://www.thuenen.de/media/institute/fg/PDF/Silvae_Genetica/2007/Vol._56_Heft_3-4/56_3-4_190.pdf10.1515/sg-2007-0029
  13. Gregorius H-R, EM Gillet and M Ziehe (2003) Measuring differences of trait distributions between populations. Biometrical Journal 45(8):959-973. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.20039006310.1002/bimj.200390063
  14. Gregorius H-R and JH Roberds (1986) Measurement of genetical differentiation among subpopulations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71(6):826-834. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0027642510.1007/BF0027642524247710
  15. Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59(8):1633-1638. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01814.x10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01814.x
  16. Hufford KM and JLH Hamrick (2003) Viability selection at three early life stages of the tropical tree Platypodium elegans (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae). Evolution 57(3):518-526. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01543.x10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01543.x12703941
  17. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17(18):4015-4026. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x19238703
  18. Lotterhos KE and MC Whitlock (2014) Evaluation of demographic history and neutral parameterization on the performance of FST outlier tests. Molecular Ecology 23(9):2178-2192. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.1272510.1111/mec.12725422876324655127
  19. Müller-Starck G (1993) Auswirkungen von Umweltbelastungen auf genetische Strukturen von Waldbeständen am Beispiel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt, Bd. 112. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, 163 p.
  20. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 70(12):3321-3323. http://www.pnas.org/content/70/12/3321.abstract10.1073/pnas.70.12.33214272284519626
  21. Nosil P, DJ Funk and D Ortiz-Barrientos (2009) Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18(3):375-402. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03946.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03946.x19143936
  22. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163(30 April 1949):688. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/163688a010.1038/163688a0
  23. Wright S (1978) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 4: Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 590 p, ISBN 9780226910529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2016-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 29
Published on: Oct 27, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Elizabeth M. Gillet, Martin Ziehe, Hans-Rolf Gregorius, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.