Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Pollen contamination and nonrandom mating in a Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh seedling seed orchard

Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. Ashley MV (2010) Plant Parentage, Pollination, and Dispersal: How DNA Microsatellites Have Altered the Landscape. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 29(3):148-16110.1080/07352689.2010.481167
  2. Askew GR, Elkassaby YA (1994) Estimation of relationship coefficients among progeny derived from wind pollinated orchard seeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88(2):267-272
  3. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology 11(11):2379-239110.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01603.x12406248
  4. Burczyk J, DiFazio S, Adams W (2004) Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? Forest Genetics 11(3/4):1-14
  5. Butcher P, Williams E (2002) Variation in outcrossing rates and growth in Eucalyptus camaldulensis from the Petford Region, Queensland; evidence of outbreeding depression. Silvae Genetica 51(1):6-12
  6. Butcher PA, Otero A, McDonald MW, Moran GF (2002) Nuclear RFLP variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. from northern Australia. Heredity 88:402-41210.1038/sj.hdy.680007411986878
  7. Chaix G, Vigneron P, Razafimaharo V, Hamon S (2010) Improved management of Malagasy Eucalyptus grandis seed orchards using microsatellites and paternity assignment. Journal of Tropical Forest Science:271-280
  8. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J (2009) Simultaneous Estimation of Null Alleles and Inbreeding Coefficients. Journal of Heredity 100(1):106-113
  9. Cockerham CC (1969) Variance of Gene Frequencies. Evolution 23(1):72-8410.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03496.x28562963
  10. da Silva JM, de Sousa ACB, De Souza AP, Mori ES, Freitas MLM, Sebbenn AM, de Moraes MLT (2009) Development and characterization of 14 microsatellite loci from an enriched genomic library of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Conservation Genetics Resources 1(1):465-46910.1007/s12686-009-9107-7
  11. Doyle J, Doyle J (1990) Isolation of DNA from small amounts of plant tissues. BRL focus 12:13-15
  12. El-Kassaby Y, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C (2015) Increasing Breeding without Breeding (BwB) Efficiency: Full-vs. Partial-Pedigree Reconstruction in Lodgepole Pine. SOJ Genet Sci 2(1):1-6
  13. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Lai BS (2010) Female reproductive success variation in a Pseudotsuga menziesii seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction from a bulk seed collection. Journal of heredity 101(2):164-16810.1093/jhered/esp12620080805
  14. EMBRAPA (1999) Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. EMBRAPA/CNPSO, Rio de Janeiro 412
  15. Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and evolution. New York, N.Y., USA; Cambridge, England. Illus: Cambridge University Press, 327 p
  16. Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, El-Kassaby YA (2014) Determination of paternal and maternal parentage in lodgepole pine seed: full versus partial pedigree reconstruction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44(9):1122-112710.1139/cjfr-2014-0145
  17. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 2.9.3.2.): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86(6):485-486
  18. Grattapaglia D, do Amaral Diener PS, Dos Santos GA (2014) Performance of microsatellites for parentage assignment following mass controlled pollination in a clonal seed orchard of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genetics & Genomes 10(6):1631-164310.1007/s11295-014-0784-3
  19. Grattapaglia D, Ribeiro V, Rezende GDS (2004) Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: an alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109(1):192-19910.1007/s00122-004-1617-915004676
  20. Griffin A, Cotterill P (1988) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 37(3-4):124-131
  21. Hardner C, Potts B (1995) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genetica 44(1):46-54
  22. Hardner C, Tibbits W (1998) Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For Genet 5:11-20
  23. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular ecology notes 2(4):618-620
  24. Hedrick PW, Hellsten U, Grattapaglia D (2016) Examining the cause of high inbreeding depression: analysis of whole-genome sequence data in 28 selfed progeny of Eucalyptus grandis. New Phytologist 209(2):600-61110.1111/nph.1363926356869
  25. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular ecology 16(5):1099-110610.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x17305863
  26. Kaya N, Isik K, Adams W (2006) Mating system and pollen contamination in a Pinus brutia seed orchard. New Forests 31(3):409-41610.1007/s11056-005-0876-x
  27. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 82(11):1420-142510.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12679.x
  28. Marshall T, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton J (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular ecology 7(5):639-65510.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x9633105
  29. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of most-likely male parents. American Naturalist 128(2):199-215
  30. Meagher TR, Thompson E (1987) Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum (Liliaceae). Ecology 68(4):803-812
  31. Miranda AC, de Moraes MLT, Tambarussi EV, Furtado EL, Mori ES, da Silva PHM, Sebbenn AM (2013) Heritability for resistance to Puccinia psidii Winter rust in Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden in Southwestern Brazil. Tree Genetics and Genomes 9(2):321-32910.1007/s11295-012-0572-x
  32. Moraes M, Gaino A, Moraes M, Freitas M, Sebbenn A (2012) Estimating coancestry within open-pollinated progenies of dioecious species: the case study of Myracrodruon urundeuva. Silvae Genetica 61(6):256-26410.1515/sg-2012-0032
  33. Moriguchi Y, Taira H, Tani N, Tsumura Y (2004) Variation of paternal contribution in a seed orchard of Cryptomeria japonica determined using microsatellite markers. Canadian journal of forest research 34(8):1683-169010.1139/x04-029
  34. Nanson A (1972) The provenance seedling seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 21(6):243-249
  35. Nei M (1977) F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Annals of Human Genetics 41(2):225-23310.1111/j.1469-1809.1977.tb01918.x596830
  36. Nieto V, Rodriguez J (2003) Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Tropical tree seed manual. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture/Forest Service:466-467
  37. Plomion C, LeProvost G, Pot D, Vendramin G, Gerber S, Decroocq S, Brach J, Raffin A, Pastuszka P (2001) Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31(10):1816-182510.1139/x01-115
  38. Potts B, Potts W, Cauvin B (1987) Inbreeding and interspecific hybridization in Eucalyptus gunnii. Silvae Genetica 36(5-6):194-199
  39. Pryor L (1976) Biology of Eucalyptus. London: Edward Arnold. Studies in Biology 61:82p
  40. Ritland K (1989) Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43(4):848-85910.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05182.x28564194
  41. Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genetical Research 67(02):175-18510.1017/S0016672300033620
  42. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88(4):221-22810.1038/sj.hdy.680002911920127
  43. Sebbenn A (2006) Sistema de reprodução em espécies arbóreas tropicais e suas implicações para a seleção de árvores matrizes para reflorestamentos ambientais. HIGA AR; SILVA, LD Pomar de sementes de espécies florestais nativas. Curitiba: FUPEF:93-138
  44. Silva JCE, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Potts BM (2011) The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 107(1):50-6010.1038/hdy.2010.154318611921224873
  45. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Adams WT (2005) Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35(7):1592-160310.1139/x05-082
  46. Sokal R, Rohlf F (1995) Biometry: principles and practices of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman and Company, New York,
  47. Stoehr MU, Newton CH (2002) Evaluation of mating dynamics in a lodgepole pine seed orchard using chloroplast DNA markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32(3):469-476
  48. Wang J (2011) Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations. Genetics 187(3):887-90110.1534/genetics.110.124438306368021212234
  49. Wang K (2004) Gene flow in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Genetica 122(2):105-11310.1023/B:GENE.0000040999.07339.d4
  50. Wu S, Xu J, Lu Z, Li G, Pan L, Han C (2015) Effects of inbreeding on growth and wood properties of selfed Eucalyptus urophylla progenies. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 27:369-375
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2016-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Published on: Jun 12, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 J. M. S. Gonzaga, R. O. Manoel, A. C. B. Sousa, A. P. Souza, M. L. T. Moraes, M. L. M. Freitas, A. M. Sebbenn, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.