References
- ABBOTT, L., S. FILIPPINI, H. DELFINO and S. PISTORALE (2012): Stability analysis of forage production in Bromus catharticus (prairie grass) using three methodologies. Ciencia e investigación agraria 39: 331-338.
- ADUGNA, A., T. TESFAYE, E. DEGU, T. TADESSE, F. MERGA, W. LEGESSE, A. TIRFESSA, H. KIDANE, A. WOLE and C. DABA (2011): Genotype-by-environmentinteraction and yield stability analysis in finger millet (Elucine coracana L. Gaertn) in Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 408-415.
- ALIA, R., G. BOZIC, D. GÖMÖRY, G. HUBER, E. RASZTOVITS and G. VON WÜHLISCH (2010): The survival and performance of beech provenances over a Europe-wide gradient of climate, pp. 115-126. In: Monografias INIA: Serie Forestale No. 22. Genetic Resources of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), edited by I. Aranda. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Madrid, ES.
- AMMER, C., E. BICKEL and C. KOLLING (2008): Converting Norway spruce stands with beech - a review of arguments and techniques. Austrian Journal of Forest Science 125: 3-26.
- ARANDA, I., L. GIL and J. PARDOS (1996): Seasonal water relations of three broadleaved species (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) in a mixed stand in the centre of the Iberian Peninsula. Forest Ecology and Management 84: 219-229.
- ATHANASIOU, K., B. C. DYSON, R. E. WEBSTER and G. N. JOHNSON (2010): Dynamic Acclimation of Photosynthesis Increases Plant Fitness in Changing Environments. Plant Physiology 152: 366-373.
- BABIĆ, V., M. BABIĆ, M. IVANOVIĆ, M. KRALJEVIĆ-BALALIĆ and M. DIMITRIJEVIĆ (2010): Understanding and utilization of genotype-by-environment interaction in maize breeding. Genetika 42: 79-90.
- BALTUNIS, B. S., W. J. GAPARE and H. X. WU (2010): Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction in Radiata pine for growth and wood quality traits in Australia. Silvae Genetica 59: 113-124.
- BELLARD, C., C. BERTELSMEIER, P. LEADLEY, W. THUILLER and F. COURCHAMP (2012): Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15: 365-377.
- BLUM, A., 2005: Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential - are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159-1168.
- BOSE L. K., N. N. JAMBHULKAR, K. PANDE and O. N. SINGH (2014a): Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under directseeded conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 74: 3-9.
- BOSE, K. L., N. N. JAMBHULKAR and K. PANDE (2014b): Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for rice genotypes under Boro condition. Genetika 46: 521-528.
- BUGMANN, H. (1997): Sensitivity of forests in the European Alps to future climatic change. Climate Research 8: 35-44.
- CROSSA, J. (1990): Statistical analysis of multi location trials. Advances in Agronomy 44: 55-86.
- CZAJKOWSKI, T. and A. BOLTE (2005): Unterschiedliche Reaktion deutscher und polnischer Herkünfte der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) auf Trockenheit. [Different reaction of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances from Germany and Poland to drought]. AllgemeineForst- und Jagd- Zeitung 177: 30-40.
- DOUNAVI, A., F. NETZER, N. CELEPIROVIC, M. IVAN - KOVIĆ, J. BURGER, A. G. FIGUEROA, S. SCHÖN, J. SIMON, E. CREMER, B. FUSSI, M. KONNERT and H. RENNENBERG (2016): Genetic and physiological differences of European beech provenances (F. sylvatica L.) exposed to drought stress. Forest Ecology and Management 361: 226-236.
- EBERHART, S. A. and W. A. RUSSELL (1966): Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties. Crop Science 6: 36-40.
- EILMANN, B., F. STERCK, L. WEGNER, S. M. G. DE VRIES, G. VON ARX, G. M. J. MOHREN, J. DEN OUDEN and U. SASS-KLAASSEN (2014): Wood structural differences between northern and southern beech provenances growing at a moderate site. Tree Physiology 34: 882-893.
- FALKENHAGEN, E. (1996): A comparison of the AMMI method with some classical statistical methods in provenance research: the case of the South African Pinus radiata trials. Forest Genetics 3: 81-87.
- FARSHADFAR, E., M. GERAVANDI and Z. VAISI (2012): Chromosomal localization of QTLs controlling genotype environment interactions in barley. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4: 317-324.
- FINLAY, K.W. and G. N. WILKINSON (1963): The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742-754.
- GAUCH, H. G. (1988): Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705-715.
- GWAZE, D. P., J. A. WOLLIAMS, P. J. KANOWSKI and F. E. BRIDGWATER (2001): Interactions of genotype with site for height and stem straightness in Pinus taeda in Zimbabwe. Silvae Genetica 50: 135-140.
- HANNERZ, M., J. SONESSON and I. EKBERG (1999): Genetic correlations between growth and growth rhythm observed in a short-term test and performance in long-term field trials of Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 768-778.
- HANNRUP, B., G. JANSSON and Ö. DANELL (2008): Genotype by environment interaction in Pinus sylvestris L. in Southern Sweden. Silvae Genetica 57: 306-311.
- HOGBERG, K. A. and B. KARLSSON (1998): Nursery selection of Picea abies clones and effects in field trials. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 12-20.
- IVANKOVIĆ, M., M. POPOVIĆ, I. KATI IĆ, G. VON WUEHLISCH and S. BOGDAN (2011): Quantitative genetic variation of European beech (Fagus sylvat-ica L.) provenances from the southeastern Europe. S˘umarski list: 25-37.
- JAZBEC, A., K. SEGOTIĆ, M. IVANKOVIĆ, H. MARJANOVIĆ and S. PERIĆ (2007): Ranking of European beech provenances in Croatia using statistical analysis and analytical hierarchy process. Forestry 80: 151-162.
- JUMP, A. S., J. M. HUNT and J. PENUELAS (2006): Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. Global Change Biology 12: 2163-2174.
- KARIMIZADEH, R., M. MOHAMMADI, M. ARMION, M. K. SHEFAZADEH and H. CHALAJOUR (2012): Determining heritability, reliability and stability of grain yield and yield-related components in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18: 595-607.
- KARLSSON, B. and K. HOGBERG (1998): Genotypic parameters and clone site interaction in clone tests of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Forest Genetics 5: 21-30.
- KIM, I., H. KWON, K. RYU and W. Y. CHOI (2008): Provenance by Site Interaction of Pinus densiflora in Korea. Silvae Genetica 57: 131-139.
- KOSKELA, J., A. BUCK, E. TEISSIER DU CROS (2007): Climate change and forest genetic diversity: Implications for sustainable forest management in Europe. Bioversity International, Rome.
- KRSTIĆ, M., M. MEDAREVIĆ, Lj. STOJANOVIĆ and S. BANKOVIĆ (2002): State and silvicultural problems of beech forests in Northeast Serbia. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 86: 161-171.
- LENORMAND, T. (2002): Geneflow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 183-189.
- LINDNER, M. (2007): How to adapt forest management in response to the challenges of climate change?, pp. 31-42. In: Climate change and forest genetic diversity: Implications for sustainable forest management in Europe, edited by J. KOSKELA, A. BUCKAND E. TESSIER DU CROS. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy.
- LINDNER, M., J. GARCIA-GONZALO, M. KOLSTRÖM, T. GREEN, R. REGUERA, M. MAROSCHEK, R. SEIDL, M. J. LEXER, S. NETHERER, A. SCHOPF, A. KREMER, S. DELZON, A. BARBATI, M. MARCHETTI and P. CORONA (2008): Impacts of climate change on European forests and options for adaptation. Report to the European Commission Directorate- General for Agriculture and Rural Development. pp. 173.
- LINDNER, M., M. MAROSCHEK, S. NETHERER, A. KREMER, A. BARBATI, J. GARCIA-GONZALO, R. SEIDL, S. DELZON, P. CORONA, M. KOLSTROM, M. LEXER and M. MARCHETTI (2010): Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 698-709.
- LITTVAY, T. (2011): Phenotypic stability and adaptability of families of common walnut (Juglans regia L.) in progeny tests. Šumarski list 13: 38-45.
- MATHESON, A. C. and C. A. RAYMOND (1986): A review of provenance x environment interaction: its practical importance and use with particular reference to the tropics. Commonwealth Forest Review 65: 283-302.
- MCKEAND, S. E., B. LI, A.V. HATCHER and R. J. WEI (1990): Stability parameter estimates for stem volume for loblolly pine families growing in different regions in the southeastern United States. Forest Science 36: 10-17.
- MCLACHLAN, J. S., J. J. HELLMANN and M.W. SCHWARTZ (2007): A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology 21: 297-302.
- MIROSAVLJEVIC, M., N. PRZULJ, J. BOCANSKI, D. STANISLAVJEVIC and B. MITROVIC (2014): The application of AMMI model for barley cultivars evaluation in multi-year trials. Genetika 46: 445-454.
- MOHAMMADI, R. and A. AMRI (2011): Graphic analysis of trait relations and genotype evaluation in durum wheat. Journal of Crop Improvement 25: 680-696.
- MUHS, H. J., L. PAULE, L. IONITA and G. VON WUEHLISCH (2010): Concept and design of the international beech provenance trials of 1995 and 1998, and suggestions for future trials. Book of abstracts. COST E52 “Evaluation of Beech Genetic Resources for Sustainable Forestry” Final Meeting. 4-6th May 2010, Burgos, Spain. p. 19.
- MURILLO, O. (2001): Genotype by environment interaction and genetic gain on unbalanced Pinus oocarpa provenances trials. Agronomía Costarricense 25: 21-32.
- ODEWALE, J. O., C. D. ATAGA, C. AGHO, G. ODIOWAYA, M. N. OKOYE and E. C. OKOLO (2013): Genotype evaluation of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) and mega environment investigation based on additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Management 2: 1-10.
- PERKINS, J. M. and J. L. JINKS (1968): Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23: 339-356.
- PONTON, S., J. DUPOUEY, N. BRÉDA and E. DREYER (2002): Comparison of water-use efficiency of seedlings from two sympatric oak species: genotype environment interactions. Tree Physiology 22: 413-422.
- Pswarayi, I. Z., R. D. Barnes, J. S. Birks and P. J. Kanowski (1997): Genotype-Environment Interaction in a Population of Pinus elliottii ENGELM. var. elliottii. Silvae Genetica 46: 35-40.
- PURCHASE, J. L., H. HATTING and C. S. VANDEVENTER (2000): Genotype environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17: 101-107.
- RAMBURAN, S., M. ZHOUAND M. LABUSCHAGNE (2011): Interpretation of genotype? environment interactions of sugarcane: Identifying significant environmental factors. Field Crops Research 124: 392-399.
- RAYMOND, C. A. and G. NAMKOONG (1990): Optimising breeding zones: Genetic flexibility or maximum value? Silvae Genetica 39: 110-112.
- REZENE, Y., A. BEKELE and Y. GOA (2014): GGE and AMMI biplot analysis for field PEA yield stability in SNNPR State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research 1: 28-38.
- ROBSON, T. M., D. SAN´CHEZ-GÓMEZ, F. J. CANO and I. ARANDA (2012): Variation in functional leaf traits among beech provenances during a Spanish summer reflects the differences in their origin. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 1111-1121.
- RWEYONGEZA, D. (2011): Pattern of genotype-environment interaction in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss in Alberta, Canada. Annals of Forest Science 68: 245-253.
- SAS INSTITUTE, INC. (2011): SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. SHAFII, B. and W. J. PRICE (1998): Analysis of genotype- by-environment interaction using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model and stability estimates. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3: 335-345.
- STATSOFT, INC. (2013): STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12.
- STOJANOVIĆ, D. B., A. KRŽIĆ, B. MATOVIC, S. ORLOVIC, A. DUPUTIE, V. DJURDJEVIC, Z. GALIC and S. STOJNIC (2013): Prediction of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) xeric limit usinga regional climate model: An example from southeast Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 176: 94-103.
- STOJNIĆ, S., S. ORLOVIĆ, Z. GALIĆ, V. VASIĆ, D. VILOTIĆ, M. KNEŽEVIĆ and M. ŠIJAIĆ-NIKOLIĆ (2012): Environmental characteristics in the European beech provenance trials at Fruška Gora Mountain and Debeli Lug. Topola/Poplar 189/190: 145-162. [in Serbian with English summary]
- STOJNIĆ, S., U. SASS-KLAASSEN, S. ORLOVIC, B. MATOVIC and B. EILMANN (2013a): Plastic growth response of European beech provenances to dry site conditions. IAWA Journal 34: 475-484.
- STOJNIĆ, S. (2013b): Variability of anatomical, physiological and morphological traits of different European beech provenances in Serbia. PhD thesis, University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry, Republic of Serbia. pp. 340. [in Serbian with English summary]
- SYKES, R., B. LI, F. ISIK, J. KADLA and H-M. CHANG (2006): Genetic variation and genotype by environment interactions of juvenile wood chemical properties in Pinus taeda L.. Annals of Forest Science 63: 897-904.
- THIEL, D., J. KREYLING, S. BACKHAUS, C. BEIERKUHNLEIN, C. BUHK, K. EGEN, G. HUBER, M. KONNERT, L. NAGY and A. JENTSCH (2014): Different reactions of central and marginal provenances of Fagus sylvatica to experimental drought. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 247-260.
- VIŠNJIĆ, Ć. (2010): Variability of some morphological characteristics of 16 provenance of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Works of the Faculty of Forestry University of Sarajevo 2: 55-70.
- VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2004): Series of International Provenance Trials of European Beech, pp. 135-144. In: Proceedings from the 7th International Beech Symposium IUFRO Research Group 1.10.00 Improvement and Silviculture of Beech, edited by K. SAGHEB-TALEBI, P. MADSEN and K. TERAZAVA. Tehran, Iran.
- VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2008): EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Bioversity International, Rome, Italy. VON WUEHLISCH, G. (2010a): Introductory note, pp. 8-9. In: Genetic resources of beech in Europe - current state, edited by J. FRÝDL, P. NOVOTNÝ, J. FENNESSY and G. VON WÜHLISCH. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Braunschweig, Germany.
- VON WUEHLISCH, G., D. BALLIAN, S. BOGDAN, M. FORSTREUTER, R. GIANNINI, B. GÖTZ, M. IVANKOVIC, S. ORLOVIC, A. PILIPOVIC and M. SIJACIC NIKOLIC (2010b): Early results from provenance trials with European beech established 2007. Book of abstracts. COST E52 “Evaluation of Beech Genetic Resources for Sustainable Forestry” Final Meeting. 4-6th May 2010, Burgos, Spain. p. 19.
- WORTEMANN, R., S. HERBETTE, T. S. BARIGAH, B. FUMANAL, R. ALIA, A. DUCOUSSO, D. GOMORY, P. ROECKEL-DREVET and H. COCHARD (2011): Genotypic variability and phenotypic plasticity of cavitation resistance in Fagus sylvatica L. across Europe. Tree Physiology 31: 1175-1182.
- ZAS, R., E. MERLO and J. FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ (2004): Genotype environment interaction in Maritime pine families in Galicia, Northwest Spain. Silvae Genetica 53: 175-182.
- ZOBEL, R.W., M. J. WRIGHT and H. G. GAUCH (1988): Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388-393.