Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genetic Variation Amongst and Within the Native Provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don in South-eastern Australia. 3. Molecular and Quantitative Structure Cover

Genetic Variation Amongst and Within the Native Provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don in South-eastern Australia. 3. Molecular and Quantitative Structure

Silvae Genetica
Volume 59 (2010): Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
By: Carolyn A. Raymond,  J. F. G. Tibbits and  M. Henson  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. ADES, P. K. and J. A. SIMPSON (1991): Variation in susceptibility to Dothistroma needle blight among provenances of Pinus radiata var. radiata. Silvae Genetica 40: 6-13.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. BURDON, R. D. (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 9: General discussion and implications for genetic management. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 274-298.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. BURDON, R. D. and C. B. LOW (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 6: wood properties: variation, heritabilities, and interrelationships with other traits. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 228-245.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. BURDON, R. D., M. H. BANNISTER, H. A. I. MADGWICK and C. B. LOW (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 1: introduction, description of experiment, and basic methodology. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 119-137.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. BURDON, R. D., R. E. GASKIN, J. A. ZABKIEWICZ and C. B. LOW (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 7: variation and inheritance of pinene composition in wood oleoresin. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 246-256.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. BURDON, R. D., A. FIRTH, C. B. LOW and M. A. MILLER (1997): Native provenances of Pinus radiata in New Zealand: performance and potential. New Zealand Forestry 41: 32-36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. BURDON, R. D., A. FIRTH, C. B. LOW and M. A. MILLER (1998): Multi-site provenance trials of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Forest Genetic Resources 26: 3-8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. BUTCHER, T. B. and M. J. C. STUKELY (1997): Variation in natural populations of Pinus radiata in resistance to Phytopthora cinnamomi. IUFRO ‘97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research institute.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. ELDRIDGE, K. G. (1978): Refreshing the genetic resources of radiata pine plantations. CSIRO Division of Forest Research, Genetics Section Report, No. 7, 120 pp.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. GARNIER-GÉRÉ, P.-H., A. C. MATHESON and P. K. ADES (1997): Assessment of the genetic potential for adaptation of natural provenances: case study of Pinus radiata. IUFRO’97 Genetics of radiata pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, FRI Bulletin.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS, S. J. WELHAM and R. THOMPSON (2002): ASReml user guide release 1. VSN, Hemel Hempstead, UK. JOHNSON, I. G., P. K. ADES and K. G. ELDRIDGE (1997): Growth of natural Californian provenances of Pinus radiata in New South Wales, Australia. New Zealand Journal
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. of Forestry Science 27: 23-38.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. KARHU, A., C. VOGL, G. F. MORAN, J. C. BELL and O. SAVOLAINEN (2006): Analysis of microsatellite variation in Pinus radiata reveals effects of genetic drift but no recent bottlenecks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 167-175.10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00982.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. KINLOCH, B. B. and W. J. LIBBY (1997): Variation in susceptibility to Western gall rust in Pinus radiata and P. muricata. IUFRO ‘97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research institute.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. LATTA, R. G. (2003): Gene flow, adaptive population divergence and comparative population structure across loci. New Phytologist 161: 51-58.10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00920.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. LIBBY, W. J. (1997): Native origins of domesticated radiata pine. In: BURDON, R. D. and MOORE, J. M. IUFRO ‘97 Genetics of Radiata Pine. FRI Bulletin No. 203. Rotorua New Zealand. pp. 9-25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. MCKAY, J. K. and R. G. LATTA (2002): Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 285-291.10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02478-3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. MERILÄ, J. and P. CRNOKRAK (2001): Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal Evolutionary Biology 14: 892-903.10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00348.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. MILLAR, C. I. (1986): The Californian closed cone pines (Subsection Oocarpae Little and Critchfield) - a taxonomic history and review. Taxon 35: 657-670.10.2307/1221607
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. MILLAR, C. I. (1997): Quaternary evolution of Pinus radiata. IUFRO ‘97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research Institute.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. MILLER, J. D., B. P. WOOD and M. B. HAMILTON (2008): Fst and Qst under neutrality. Genetics 180: 1023-1037. 10.1534/genetics.108.092031256735318780742
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. MORAN, G. F., J. C. BELL and K. G. ELDRIDGE (1988): The genetic structure and the conservation of the five natural populations of Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 506-514.10.1139/x88-074
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. MORAN, G. F. and J. C. BELL (1987): The origin and genetic diversity of Pinus radiata in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43: 616-622.10.1007/BF0028920324241122
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS and P. DONNELLY (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.10.1093/genetics/155.2.945146109610835412
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. PRITCHARD, J., D. FALUSH and M. STEPHENS (2002): Inference of population structure in recently admixed populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 71: 177-177.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. RAYMOND, C. A. and M. HENSON (2009): Genetic variation within the native provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don. 1. Growth and form to age 26 years. Silvae Genetica 58: 242-252.10.1515/sg-2009-0031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. RAYMOND, C. A., M. HENSON and B. JOE (2009): Genetic variation within the native provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don. 2. Wood density and stiffness at age 26 years. Silvae Genetica, 58: 192-204.10.1515/sg-2009-0025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. ROGERS, D. L. (2002): In situ Genetic Conservation of Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don): Information and Recommendations. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Genetic Conservation Program Report No. 26. Davis, California, USA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. ROSENBERG, N. A. (2005): Algorithms for selecting informative marker panels for population assignment. Journal of Computational Biology 12: 1183-1201.10.1089/cmb.2005.12.118316305328
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. ROSENBERG, N. A., T. BURKE, K. ELO, M. W. FELDMANN, P. J. FREIDLIN, M. A. M. GROENEN, J. HILLEL, A. MAKI-TANILA, M. TIXIER-BOICHARD, A. VIGNAL, K. WIMMERS and S. WEIGEND (2001): Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics 159: 699-713.10.1093/genetics/159.2.699146184211606545
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. ROSENBERG, N. A., L. LI, R. WARD and J. K. PRITCHARD (2003): Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. American Journal of Human Genetics 73: 1402-1422.10.1086/380416118040314631557
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. ROSENBERG, N. A., S. MAHAJAN, S. RAMACHANDRAN, C. F. ZHAO, J. K. PRITCHARD and M. W. FELDMAN (2005): Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure. Plos Genetics 1: 660-671.10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070131057916355252
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. STEANE, D. A., N. CONOD, R. C. JONES, R. E. VAILLANCOURT, B. M. POTTS (2006): A comparative analysis of population structure of a forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae), using microsatellite markers and quantitative traits. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2: 30-38.10.1007/s11295-005-0028-7
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. VOGL, C., A. KARHU, G. MORAN and O. SAVOLAINEN (2002): High resolution analysis of mating systems: inbreeding in natural populations of Pinus radiata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 433-439.10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00404.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2010-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 289 - 298
Submitted on: Aug 4, 2010
Published on: Oct 20, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Pinus radiata,
provenances,
Californian collection,
Qst,
Fst,
structure
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Genetics,
Biotechnology,
Plant science

© 2017 Carolyn A. Raymond, J. F. G. Tibbits, M. Henson, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 59 (2010): Issue 1-6 (December 2010)Next article