Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genetic Variation in Cold Hardiness and Phenology Between and Within Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Populations: Implications for Seed Transfer Cover

Genetic Variation in Cold Hardiness and Phenology Between and Within Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Populations: Implications for Seed Transfer

By: G. E. Kandemir,  Zeki Kaya,  F. Temel and  S. Önde  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. AITKEN, S. N. and M. HANNERZ (2001): Genecology and gene resource management strategies for conifer cold hardiness, pp. 23-53. In: Conifer cold hardiness, edited by F. S. BIGRAS and S. CULOMBO, Kluwer Academic Press, New York.10.1007/978-94-015-9650-3_2
  2. ALDRETE, A., J. G. MEXAL and K. E. BURR (2008): Seedling cold hardiness, bud set, and bud break in nine provenances of Pinus greggii Engelm. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 3672-3676.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.054
  3. ANONYMOUS (2009): 2008 Yılı Çalıs¸ma Raporu, 2009 Yılı Çalıs¸ma Programı. Orman Ag˘açları ve Tohumları Islah Aras¸tırma Müdürlüg˘ü, Sayı: 3, Ankara, Turkey. [Annual Report 2008, Work Program for 2009. Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Directorate, No: 3, Ankara, Turkey.]
  4. ARBEZ, M. (1974): Distribution, ecology and variation of Pinus brutia in Turkey, pp. 21-33 in Forest Genetic Resources (No: 3), FAO, Rome/Italy.
  5. BINDER, W. D. and P. FIELDER (1996): Chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of frost hardiness in white spruce seedlings from different latitudes. New Forests 11: 233-253.10.1007/BF00036784
  6. FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., London, UK.
  7. FISKER, S. E., R. ROSE and D. L. HAASE (1995): Chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of cold hardiness and freezing stress in 1+1 Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Science 41: 564-575.10.1093/forestscience/41.3.564
  8. HAMANN, A. and T. WANG (2006): Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87: 2773-2786.10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2773:PEOCCO]2.0.CO;2
  9. IŞIK, F. (1986): Altitudinal variation in Pinus brutia Ten.: Seed and seedling characteristics. Silvae Genetica 35: 58-67.
  10. IŞIK, F., S. KESKIN, R. SABUNCU, M. S¸AHIN, M. N. BAS¸ and Z. KAYA (2002): Effects of water stress on the adaptive traits of different Pinus brutia natural populations and families in a nursery trial, Technical Bulletin No: 15, Southwest Anatolia Forest Research Institute, Antalya, Turkey, 42 p.
  11. KANDEMIR, G. E. (2002): Genetics and physiology of cold and drought resistance in Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) populations from southern Turkey. PhD. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  12. KAYA, Z. and A. TEMERIT (1994): Genetic structure of marginally located Pinus nigra var. pallasiana populations in Central Turkey. Silvae Genetica 43: 272-277.
  13. KAYA, Z. and F. IŞIK (1997): The pattern of genetic variation in shoot growth of Pinus brutia Ten. populations sampled from the Toros Mountains in Turkey. Silvae Genetica 46: 73-81.
  14. KOSKI, V. and J. ANTOLA (1993): National Tree Breeding and Seed Production Program for Turkey 1994-2003, Enso Forest Development Oy. Ltd., Turkish-Finnish Forestry Project.
  15. KULLMAN, L. (2002): Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes. Journal of Ecology 90: 68-77.10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00630.x
  16. LAMBETH, C. C. (1980): Juvenile-mature correlations in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. Forest Science 26: 571-580.
  17. LEDIG, F. T. (1987): Genetic structure and the conservation of California’s endemic and near endemic conifers, pp. 587-594. In: Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants, edited by T. S. ELLIS, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
  18. LEINONEN, I. and H. HÄNNINEN (2002): Adaptation of timing of bud burst of Norway spruce and boreal climates. Silva Fennica 36: 695-701.10.14214/sf.534
  19. MARACCHI, G., O. SIROTENKO and M. BINDI (2005): Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Climatic Change 70: 117-135.10.1007/s10584-005-5939-7
  20. MÁTYÁS, C. (1996): Climatic adaptation of trees: rediscovering provenance tests. Euphytica 92: 45-54.10.1007/BF00022827
  21. PARMESAN, C. and G. YOHE (2003): A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.10.1038/nature01286
  22. ROOT, T. L., J. T. PRICE, K. R. HALL, S. H. SCHNEIDER, C. ROSENZWEIG and J. A. POUNDS (2003): Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60.10.1038/nature01333
  23. SAS INSTITUTE INC. (1990): SAS/STAT(c) User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th edition. Cary.
  24. SEARLE, S. R., G. CASELLA and C. E. MCCULLOCH (1992): Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York.10.1002/9780470316856
  25. SOGAARD, G., O. JOHNSON, J. NILSEN and O. JUNTTILA (2008): Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 28: 311-320.10.1093/treephys/28.2.31118055441
  26. SPENCER, D. (2001): Conifers in the Dry Country: A report for the RIRDC/L&W Australia/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products-Australia, RIRDC Publication No: 01/46, Australia, 60 p.
  27. SPITTLEHOUSE, D. L. (2005): Integrating climate change adaptation into forest management. Forestry Chronicle 81: 691-695.10.5558/tfc81691-5
  28. STONECYPHER, R. W. (1992): Computational methods, pp. 195-228. In: Handbook of quantitative forest genetics edited by L. FINS, S. T. FRIEDMAN and J. V. BROTSCHOL, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-015-7987-2_6
  29. SWALLOW, W. H. and J. F. MONAHAN (1984): Monte Carlo comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML estimators of variance components. Technometrics 26: 47-57.10.1080/00401706.1984.10487921
  30. VELİOĞLU, E., F. F. ÇİÇEK, Z. KAYA and B. ÇENGEL (2000): Genetic variation in natural Kazdag˘ı Fir (Abies equitrojani Aschers et. Sint.) populations sampled from Kazdag˘ları, Technical Bulletin No: 3, Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Directorate, Ankara, Turkey, 31 p.
  31. WALTHER, G. R., E. POST, P. CONVEY, A. MENZEL, C. PARMESAN, T. J. C. BEEBEE, J. M. FROMENTIN, O. HOEGH-GULDBERG and F. BAIRLEIN (2002): Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389-395. 10.1038/416389a11919621
  32. WANG, T., A. HAMANN, A. YANCHUK, G. A. O’NEILL and S. N. AITKEN (2006): Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Global Change Biology 12: 2404-2416.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x
  33. WHITE, T. (1996): Genetic parameter estimates and breeding value predictions: issues and implications in tree improvement programs, pp. 110-117. In: Tree improvement for sustainable tropical forestry, edited by M. J. DETERS, C. E. HARWOOD and S. U. WALKER, Queensland Forestry Research Institute, Gympie.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2010-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 57
Submitted on: Mar 25, 2008
Published on: Oct 20, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 G. E. Kandemir, Zeki Kaya, F. Temel, S. Önde, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.