Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Phenotype and Combined Index Selection at Optimal Breeding Population Size Considering Gain and Gene Diversity Cover

Comparison of Phenotype and Combined Index Selection at Optimal Breeding Population Size Considering Gain and Gene Diversity

By: H. Li and  D. Lindgren  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. ANDERSSON, E. W., K. A. SPANOS, T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN (1998a): Phenotypic selection can be better than selection for breeding value. Scand. J. For. Res. 13: 7-11.10.1080/02827589809382956
  2. ANDERSSON, E. W., K. A. SPANOS, T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN (1998b): Phenotypic selection compared to restricted combined index selection for many generations. Silva Fennica 32(2): 111-120.10.14214/sf.689
  3. BURTON, G.W. (1974a): Recurrent restricted phenotypic selection increases forage yields of Pensacola bahiagrass. Crop Sci. 14: 831-835.10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400060016x
  4. BURTON, G.W. (1974b): Improved recurrent restricted phenotypic selection increases Bahiagrass forage yields. Crop Sci. 22: 1058-1061.10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200050040x
  5. COCKERHAM, C. C. (1967): Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56: 89-104.10.1093/genetics/56.1.8912114966035597
  6. COTTERILL, P. P. (1986): Gentic gains from alternative breeding strategies including simple low cost options. Silvae Genet. 35: 212-223.
  7. DANUSEVIČIUS, D. and D. LINDGREN (2005): Optimisation of breeding population size for long-term breeding. Scandinavian Journal Forest Research (20) 1: 18-25.10.1080/02827580410019517
  8. DEMPFLE, L. (1990): Problems in the use of the relationship matrix in animal breeding. In: Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestock. (ed. D. GIANOLA and K. HAMMOND). Pp. 454-473. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_20
  9. FALCONER, D. S. (1989): Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edition. Longman, Scientific and Technical.
  10. LINDGREN, D., L. D. GEA and P. A. JEFFERSON (1996): Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica 45: 52-59.
  11. LINDGREN, D. (2003): Low-input tree breeding strategies. In: Eucalyptus plantations-Research, Management and Development, R.-P. WEI and D. XU (eds), World scientific, Singapore, 146-149.10.1142/9789812704504_0013
  12. LSTIBŮREK M, 2005: Population response to positive assortative mating in forest tree breeding, PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh. USA.
  13. MULLIN, T. J. and Y. S. PARK (1995): Stochastic simulation of population management strategies for tree breeding: a new decision support tool for tree personal computers. Silvae Genet. 44: 132-141.
  14. ROSVALL, O. (1999): Enhancing gain from long-term forest tree breeding while conserving genetic diversity. Ph.D Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå.
  15. WEI, R.-P. and D. LINDGREN (1991): Selection effects on diversity and gain. Silva Fennica 25(4): 229-234.
  16. WEI, R.-P. and D. LINDGREN (1993): Phenotypic selection was more efficient than combined index selection when applied on full sibs of lodgepole and Scots pine. Dept. of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, SUAS Report 11: 289-292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2006-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 19
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2005
|
Published on: Oct 19, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 H. Li, D. Lindgren, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.