Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Polyploidy in Gymnosperms: Revisited Cover
By: M. Raj Ahuja  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. AHUJA, M. R. (2001): Recent advances in molecular genetics of forest trees. Euphytica. 121: 173-195.10.1023/A:1012226319449
  2. AHUJA, M. R. and D. B. Neale (2002): Origins of polyploidy in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.) and relationship of coast redwood to other genera of Taxodiaceae. Silvae Genet. 51: 93-100.
  3. ALLNUTT, T. R., A. C. NEWTON, A. LARA, A. PREMOLI, J. J. ARMEST, R. VERGARA and M. GARDNER (1999): Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (alerce), a threatened South American conifer. Mol. Ecol. 8: 975-987.
  4. ANDERSSON, E. (1947): A case of assyndesis in Picea abies. Hereditas 33: 301-347.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1947.tb02807.x
  5. BENNETT, M. D., I. J. LEITCH and L. HANSON (1998): DNA amounts in two samples of angiosperm weeds. Ann. Bot. 82 (Supplement A): 121-13410.1006/anbo.1998.0785
  6. BLANC, G. and K. H. WOLFE (2004): Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distribution of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667-1678.10.1105/tpc.02134551415215208399
  7. BORZAN, Z. and D. PAPES˘ (1978): Karyotype analysis in Pinus: A contribution to the standardization of the karyotype analysis and review of some applied techniques. Silvae Genet. 27: 144-150.
  8. BOWE, L. M., G. COAT and C.W. DEPAMPHILIS (2000): Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: Extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales’ closest relatives are conifers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4092-4097.10.1073/pnas.97.8.40921815910760278
  9. CHAW, S.-M., C. L. PARKINSON, Y. CHENG, T. M. VINCENT and J. D. PALMER (2000): Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: Morphology, of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4086-4091.10.1073/pnas.97.8.40861815710760277
  10. CHIBA, S. (1951): Triploids and tetraploid of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) selected in forest nursery. Bull. Govt. For. Exp. Station, Tokyo, Japan 49: 99-108.
  11. CHRISTIANSEN, H. (1950): A tetraploid of Larix deciduas Miller. Det. Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. 18: 1-9.
  12. CRITCHFIELD, W. B. (1975): Interspecific hybridization in Pinus: A summary review. In: Symposium on Interspecific and Interprovenance Hybridization in Forest Trees, FOWLER, D. P. and YEATMAN, C.W. (Eds). Proc. 14th Meet. Canadian Tree Improv. Assoc. Part 2, Fredricton, pp. 99-105.
  13. CRITCHFIELD, W. B. (1988): Hybridization in California firs. For. Sci. 34: 139-151.
  14. DARLINGTON, C. D. (1937): Recent Advances in Cytology. J. & A. Churchill, Ltd. London.
  15. DELEVORYAS, T. (1980): Polyploidy in gymnosperms. In: Polyploidy-Biological Relevance. LEWIS, W. H. (Ed). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 215-218. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_12550825
  16. DE LUC, A., R. A. ADAMS and M. ZHONG (1999): Using random amplification of polymorphic DNA for a taxonomic reevaluation of Pfitzer Juniperus. HortScience 34: 1123-1125.10.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1123
  17. DHILLON, S. S. (1987): DNA in tree species. In: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry. Vol. 1. BONGA. J. M. and DURZAN, D. J. (Eds). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 298-313.10.1007/978-94-017-0994-1_18
  18. DOUDRICK, R. L., J. S. HESLOP-HARRISON, C. D. NELSON, T. SCHMIDT, W. L. NANCE and T. SCHWARZACHER (1995): Karyotype of slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) using patterns of fluorescence in situ hybridization and fluorochrome banding. J. Heredity 86: 289-296.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111583
  19. DREWRY, A. (1988): The G-banded karyotype of Pinus resinosa Ait. Silvae Genet. 37: 218-221.
  20. DUFFIELD, J.W. (1952): Relation and species hybrids in the genus Pinus. Z. Forstgenetik u. Forstpflanzenzüchtung 1: 93-100.
  21. FERNANDES, A. (1936): Sur la caryologie de Welwitschia mirabilis Hook. Biol. Soc. Broteriana 11: 267-282.
  22. FLORIN, R. (1932): Die Chromosomenzahlen bei Welwitschia und einigen Ephedra-Arten. Svensk bot. Tidskr. 26: 205-214.
  23. FOZDAR, B. S. and W. J. LIBBY (1968): Chromosomes of Sequoia sempervirens: 8 hydroxuquiniline-castor oil pretreatment for improving preparation. Stain Tech. 43: 97-100.10.3109/105202968091150504870872
  24. FRAVER, S., M. E. GONZALES, F. SILLA and A. LARA (1999): Composition and structure of remnant Fitzroya cupressoides forests of southern Chile’s Central Depression. J. Torr. Bot. Soc. 126: 49-57.
  25. FRIESEN, N., A. BRANDES and J. S. HESLOP-HARRISON (2001): Diversity, origin, and distribution of retrotransposons (gypsy and copia) in conifers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1176-1188.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a00390511420359
  26. GADEK, P. A, D. L. ALPERS, M. M. HESELWOOD and C. J. QUINN (2000): Relationship within Cupressaceae sensu lato: A combined morphological and molecular approach. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1044-1057.10.2307/2657004
  27. GAUT, B. S. and J. F. DOEBLEY (1997): DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 6809-6814.10.1073/pnas.94.13.68092124011038553
  28. GAUT, B. S., M. LE THIERRY D’ENNEQUIN, A. S. PEEK and M. C. SAWKINS (2000): Maize as a model for the evolution of plant nuclear genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7008-7015.10.1073/pnas.97.13.70083437710860964
  29. GIBSON, T. J. and J. SPRING (2000): Evidence in favor of ancient octoploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem Soc. Tans. 28: 259-264.10.1042/bst028025910816139
  30. GRANT, V. (1981): Plant Speciation. (Second Edition). Columbia University Press, New York.10.7312/gran92318
  31. GUSTAFSSON, A. (1960): Polyploidy and mutagenesis in forest- tree breeding. Proc. V World Forestry Congr. pp. 793-805.
  32. GUSTAFSSON, A. and F. MERGEN (1964): Some principles of tree cytology and genetics. Unasylva 18(2-3): 7-20.
  33. HAIR, J. B. (1968): The chromosomes of the Cupressaceae. I. Tetraclineae and Actinostrobeae (Callitroideae). New Zealand J. Bot. 6: 277-284.
  34. HALL, M. T., A. MUKHERJEE and W. R. CROWLEY (1979): Chromosome counts in cultivated junipers. Bot. Gaz. 140: 364-370.10.1086/337098
  35. HAMRICK, R., M. J.W. GODT and S. L. SHERMAN-BROYLES (1992): Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 5: 95-124.10.1007/BF00120641
  36. HIDA, M. (1957): The comparative study of Taxodiaceae from the standpoint of development of cone scales. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 70: 45-51.10.15281/jplantres1887.70.44
  37. HIRAYOSHI, I. and Y. NAKAMURA (1943): Chromosome number of Sequoia sempervirens. Bot. Zool. 2: 73-75.
  38. HIZUME, M., T. KONDO, F. SHIBATA and R. ISHIZUKU (2001): Flow cytometric determination of genome size in the Taxodiaceae, Cupressaceae sensu stricto and Sciadopityaceae. Cytologia 66: 307-311.10.1508/cytologia.66.307
  39. HIZUME, M., K. K. ABE and A. TANAKA (1988): Fluorescent chromosome banding in Taxodiaceae. La Kromosomo II- 50: 1609-1627.
  40. HIZUME, M., F. SHIBATA, Y. MATSUSAKI and Z. GARAJOVA (2002): Chromosome identification and comparative karyotype analysis of four Pinus species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 491-497.
  41. HUNZIKER, J. H. (1953): Número de chromosomas de varias especies sudamericanas de Ephedra. Rev. Argent. Agron. 20: 141-143.
  42. HUNZIKER, J. H. (1955): Morfología chromosómica de nueve especies Argentinas del género Ephedra. Rev. Investigaciones Agricolas 9: 201-209.
  43. ILLIES, Z. M. (1951). Colchicineversuche an Larix deciduas Miller und Picea abies Karst. Z. Forstgenetik u Forstpflanzenzüchtung 1: 36-39.
  44. ILLIES, Z. M. (1952): Auslese von Mehrlingskeimlingen in Einzelbaumnachkommenschaften von Picea abies. Z. Forstgenetik u. Forstpflanzenzüchtung 2: 21.
  45. ILLIES, Z. M. (1953): Keimlingsabnormalitäten bei Picea abies (L.) Karst. Z. Forstgenetik 2: 28-32.
  46. ILLIES, Z. M. (1957): Zytologische Beobachtungen an einer 7jährigen Co-Generation von Lärche. Silveae Genet. 6: 151-152.
  47. ILLIES, Z. M. (1958): Polysomatie im Meristem von Einzelbaumsaarten bei Picea abies. Silvae Genet. 7: 94-97.
  48. ILLIES, Z. M. (1966a): Die Variation unbalanzierter Chromosomenzahlen im Knospenmeristem fünf aufeinander folgender Astjahrgänge bei aneuploiden C1-Lärchen. Silvae Genet. 15: 133-135.
  49. ILLIES, Z. M. (1966b): The development of aneuploidy in somatic cells of experimentally produced triploid larches. Heredity 21: 379-385.10.1038/hdy.1966.39
  50. ILLIES, Z. M. (1969): Two aneuploid generations of larch hybrids deriving from colchicines induced Larix sp. Proc. Second World Consultation on Forest Tree Breeding, 5p.
  51. JENSEN, H. and A. LEVAN (1941): Colchicine-induced tetraploidy in Sequoiadendron giganteum. Heriditas 27: 220-224.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1941.tb03257.x
  52. JOHNSSON, H. (1945): The triploid progeny of a cross diploid and tetraploid Populus tremula. Hereditas 31: 411-440.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1945.tb02761.x21021077
  53. JOHNSSON, H. (1950): On the Co and C1 generations of Alnus glutinosa. Hereditas 36: 205-219.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1950.tb03372.x
  54. JOHNSSON, H. (1956): Auto- and allotriploid Betula families, derived from colchicines treatment. Z. Forstgenetik u. Forestpflanzenzüchtung 5: 65-70.
  55. JOHNSSON, H. (1975): Observations on induced polyploidy in some conifers (Pinus silvestris, P. contorta, Picea abies, and Larix siberica. Silvae Genet. 24: 62-68.
  56. KATO, A., J. C. LAMB and J. A. BIRCHLER (2004): Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 13554-13559.10.1073/pnas.040365910151879315342909
  57. KIELLANDER, C. L. (1950): Polyploidy in Picea abies. Hereditas 36: 513-516.
  58. KHOSHOO, T. N. (1959): Polyploidy in gymnosperms. Evolution 13: 24-39.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb02991.x
  59. KHOSHOO, T. N. (1961): Chromosome numbers in gymnosperms. Silvae Genet. 10: 1-9.
  60. KHOSHOO, T. N. (1963): Cytogenetical evolution in conifers. Proc. World Consultation of Forest Genetics and Tree Improvement. FAO/FORGEN 63-1/2, 5p.
  61. KHOSHOO, T. N. and M. R. AHUJA (1962): The karyotype in Welwitschia mirabilis. Nature 193: 356.10.1038/193356a0
  62. KHOSHOO, T. N. and M. R. AHUJA (1963): The chromosomes and relationships of Welwitschia mirabilis. Chromosoma (Berl.) 14: 522-533.10.1007/BF00321471
  63. KRUTOVSKY, K.V., M. TROGGIO, G. R. BROWN, K. D. JERMSTAD and D. B. NEALE (2004): Comparative mapping in Pinaceae. Genetics 168: 447-461.10.1534/genetics.104.028381144810815454556
  64. KU, H.-M., T. VISION, J. LIU and S. D. TANKSLEY (2000): Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: Large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 9121-9126.10.1073/pnas.1602712971683210908680
  65. KUSUMI, J., Y. TSUMURA, H. YOSHIMURA and H. TACHIDA (2000): Phylogenetic relationship in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region and trnL intron sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1480-1488.10.2307/2656874
  66. LARA, A. and R. VILLALBA (1993): A 3620-year temperature record from Fitzroya cupressoides tree rings in southern South America. Science 260: 1104-1106.10.1126/science.260.5111.110417806339
  67. LEITCH, I. J. and M. D. BENNETT (2004): Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 82: 651-663.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x
  68. LEITCH, I. J., L. HANSON, M. WINFIELD, J. PARKER and M. D. BENNETT (2001): Nuclear DNA C-values complete familial representation in gymnosperms. Ann. Bot. 88: 843-849.
  69. LIBBY, W. J., R. F. STETTLER and F. W. SEITZ (1969): Forest genetics and forest tree breeding. Annu. Rev. Genet. 3: 469-494.10.1146/annurev.ge.03.120169.002345
  70. LUBARETZ, O., J. FUCHS, R. AHNE, A. MEISTER and L. SCHUBERT (1996): Karyotyping of three Pinaceae species via fluorescent in situ hybridization and computer-aided chromosome analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 411-416.10.1007/BF0022368724166265
  71. MASTERSON, J. (1994): Stomatal size in fossil plants: Evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421-423.10.1126/science.264.5157.42117836906
  72. MCLYSAGHT, A., K. HOKAMP and K. H. WOLFE (2002): Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nature Genetics 31: 200-204.10.1038/ng88412032567
  73. MEHRA, P. N. (1946): A study of the karyotype and the occurrence of diploid male gametophytes in some species of the genus Ephedra. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India 16: 259-286.
  74. MEHRA, P. N. (1960): Cytology and breeding in conifers. Proc. V World Forestry Congr. 2: 728-733
  75. MEHRA, P. N. and T. N. KHOSHOO (1956): Cytology of conifers, I. J. Genet. 54: 165-180.
  76. MERGEN, F. (1958): Natural polyploidy in slash pine. For. Sci. 4: 283-295.
  77. MERGEN, F. (1959): Colchicine-induced polyploidy in pines. J. Forestry 57: 180-190.
  78. MERGEN, F. (1961): The chromosomes of Pseudolarix amabilis. Cytologia 26: 213-216.10.1508/cytologia.26.213
  79. MILLAR, C. I. (1998): Early evolution of pines. In: Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. RICHARDSON, D. M. (Ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 69-91.
  80. MILLAR, C. I. and K. A. MARSHALL (1991): Allozyme variation of Port-Orford-Cedar (Chamaecyparus lawsoniaina): Implications for genetic conservation. For. Sci. 37: 1060-1077.
  81. MILLER, C. N. (1977): Mesozoic conifers. Bot. Rev. 43: 217-280. MIROV, N. T. (1967): The Genus Pinus. Ronald Press, New York.10.1007/BF02860718
  82. MIROV, N. T. and P. STOCKWELL (1939): Colchicine treatment of pine seeds. J. Heredity 30: 389-390. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104769
  83. MURRAY, B. G. (1998): Nuclear DNA amounts in gymnosperms. Ann. Bot. 82 (Supplement A): 3-15.10.1006/anbo.1998.0764
  84. MURRAY, B. G., N. FRIESEN and J. S. HESLOP-HARRISON (2002): Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Podocarpus and comparison with other gymnosperm species. Ann. Bot. 89: 483-489
  85. MÜNTZING, A. (1933): Hybrid incompatibility and origin of polyploidy. Hereditas 18: 33-55.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1933.tb02596.x
  86. NISHIMURA, S. (1960): Chromosome numbers of polyembryonic seedlings of Pinus thunbergii Parl. J. Jap. For. Sci. 42: 263-264.
  87. OHNO, S. (1970): Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3
  88. OHRI, D. and M. R. AHUJA (1990): Giemsa C-banded karyotype in Quercus L. (oak). Silvae Genet. 39: 216-219.
  89. OLSON, D. F. and D. F. ROY and G. A. WALTERS (1990): Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. Redwood. In: Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers. BURNS, R. M. and HONKALA, B. H. (Technical Coordinators). Agriculture Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Washington, pp. 541-551.
  90. OTTO, S. P. and J. WHITTON (2000): Polyploidy incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34: 401-437.10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.40111092833
  91. PEDERICK, L. A. (1970): Chromosome relationship between Pinus species. Silvae Genet. 19: 171-180.
  92. PREMOLI, A. C., T. KITZBERGER and T. T. VEBLEN (2000a): Conservation genetics of the endangered conifer Fritzoya cupressoides in Chile and Argentina. Conservation Genet. 1: 57-66.10.1023/A:1010181603374
  93. PREMOLI, A, C., T. KITZBERGER and T. T. VEBLEN (2000b): Isozyme variation and recent biogeographical history of long-lived conifer Fitzroya cupressoides. J. Biogeography 27: 251-260.10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00402.x
  94. RAMSEY, J. and D.W. SCHEMSKE (1998): Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 467-501.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467
  95. RAMSEY, J. and D.W. SCHEMSKE (2002): Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 589-639.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437
  96. RODRIGUEZ, D. J. (1996): A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. Am. Nat. 147: 33-46.
  97. ROGERS, D. L. (1997): Inheritance of allozymes from seed tissues of the hexaploid gymnosperm, Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.) (coast redwood). Heredity 78: 166-175.10.1038/hdy.1997.24
  98. SANKOFF, D. (2001): Gene and genome duplication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11: 681-684.10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00253-7
  99. SAX, K. and H. J. SAX (1933): Chromosome number and morphology in the conifers. J. Arnold Arboretum 14: 356-375.10.5962/bhl.part.9959
  100. SAYLOR, L. C. (1972): Karyotype analysis of the genus Pinus - subgroup Pinus. Silvae Genet. 21: 155-163.
  101. SAYLOR, L. C. (1983): Karyotype analysis of the genus Pinus - subgroup Strobus. Silvae Genet. 32: 119-124.
  102. SAYLOR, L. C. and H. A. SIMONS (1970): Karyology of Sequoia sempervirens; karyotype and accessory chromosomes. Cytologia 35: 294-303.10.1508/cytologia.35.294
  103. SCHLARBAUM, S. E. and T. TSUCHIYA (1984a): A chromosome study of coast redwood, Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don.) Endl.). Silvae Genet. 33: 56-62.
  104. SCHLARBAUM, S. E. and T. TSUCHIYA (1984b): Cytotaxonomy and phylogeny of certain species in Taxodiaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 147: 29-54.10.1007/BF00984578
  105. SCHWARZACHER, T. (2003): DNA, chromosomes, and in situ hybridization. Genome 46: 953-962.10.1139/g03-119
  106. SEOIGHE, C. (2003): Turning the clock back on ancient genome duplication. Curr. Opinion Dev. Genet. Dev. 13: 636-643.10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.005
  107. SEWELL, M. M., B. K. SHERMAN and D. B. NEALE (1999): A consensus map for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). I. Construction and integration of individual linkage aps from two outbred three-generation pedigrees. Genetics 151: 321-330.10.1093/genetics/151.1.321
  108. SIMAK, M. (1962): Karyotype analysis of Larix deciduas Mill. from different provenances. Medd. Stat. Skogsforskn. Inst. 51: 3-22.
  109. SIMAK, M. (1964): Karyotype analysis of Siberian larch (Larix siberica Lebd. and Larix sukaezewii Dyl.) Studia Forestalia Suecica Nr. 17: 15p.
  110. SOLTIS, D. E. and P. S. SOLTIS (1993): Molecular data and dynamics of polyploidy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12: 243-273.10.1080/07352689309701903
  111. SOLTIS, D. E. and P. S. SOLTIS (1999): Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 348-352.10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01638-9
  112. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH (2003): Evolution of genome size in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1596-1603.10.3732/ajb.90.11.159621653334
  113. STAURT-ROGERS, C. and A. J. FLAVELL (2001): The evolution of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons in gymnosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 155-163.
  114. STEBBINS, G. L. (1948): The chromosomes and relationship of Metasequoia and Sequoia. Science 108: 95-98.10.1126/science.108.2796.95
  115. STEBBINS, G. L. (1950): Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.10.7312/steb94536
  116. STEBBINS, G. L. (1971): Chromosome Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold, London.
  117. SYRACH-LARSEN, C. and M. WESTERGAARD (1938): A triploid hybrid between Larix deciduas Mill. and Larix occidentalis Nutt. J. Genet. 36: 523-530.
  118. TAKASO, T. and P. B. TOMLINSON (1992): Seed cone and ovule ontogeny in Metasequoia, Sequoia and Sequoiadendron (Taxodiaceae, Coniferales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100: 15-37. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. (2000): Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
  119. THOMAS, G. and K. K. CHING (1968): A comparative karyotype analysis of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, and Pseudotsuga wisconiana (Hayata). Silvae Genet. 17: 138-143.
  120. TODA, Y. (1996): Karyomorphological studies of the Taxodiaceae. Forest Genetics 3: 141-146.
  121. VAN DE PEER, Y., J. S. TAYLOR and A. MEYER (2003): Are all fishes ancient polyploids? J. Structural and Functional Genomics 2: 65-73.10.1023/A:1022652814749
  122. VEBLEN, T. T. and D. H. ASHTON (1982): The regeneration status of Fitzroya cupressoides in the Cordillera Pelada, Chile. Biol. Cons. 23: 141-161.10.1016/0006-3207(82)90036-2
  123. WENDEL, J. F. (2000): Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 225-249.
  124. WOLFE, K. H. (2001): Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nature Rev. Genet. 2: 323-341.
  125. WRIGHT, J.W. (1976): Introduction to Forest Genetics. Academic Press, New York. 10.1016/B978-0-12-765250-4.50005-8
  126. ZHANG, S., L. QI, C. CHEN, X. LI, W. SONG, B. CHEN and S. HANN (2004): A report of triploid Populus of the section Aigeiros. Silvae Genet. 53: 69-75.10.1515/sg-2004-0013
  127. ZINNAI, L. (1952): Tetraploid plants in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. Et Zucc.) discovered in transplant beds. J. Jap. For. Soc. 34: 185-187.
  128. ZINNAI, L. (1953): The morphological characters and the fertility of the pollen of a tetraploid Japanese red pine induced by the colchicines method. J. Jap. For. Soc. 35: 245-248.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 69
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2005
Published on: Oct 19, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 M. Raj Ahuja, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.