Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Genetic Structure and Variability of Natural Populations of Maritime Pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Morocco

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. BARADAT, P. and MARPEAU, A. (1988): Le Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Biologie et génétique des terpènes pour la conaissance et l’amélioration de l’espèce. Université Bordeaux I, Bordeaux, France.
  2. BARBA, D., GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ, S. C., RIBEIRO, M. M., AGÚNDEZ, D., SALVADOR, L., ALÍA1, R. and GIL, L. (2001): Variación genética de Pinus pinaster Ait.: aplicación a la identificación y caracterización del material forestal de reproducción (MFR). Actas del III Congreso Forestal Español, Tomo V: 263-269.
  3. BARBÉRO, M., LOISEL, R., QUÉZEL, P., RICHARDSON, D. M. and ROMANE, F. (1998): Pines of the Mediterranean Basin. Pp. 153-170. In: RICHARDSON, D. M. (ed.). Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. BEDHRI, M. M. (1992): La protection juridique de l’arbre dans le droit marocaine, Actes des Premières Journées de l’Arbre, Ed. Laboratoire d’Ecologie Végétale Fac. Sci. Semlalia Marrakech, pp. 11-13.
  5. BENABID, A. (1985): Les écosystèmes forestiers et pré forestiers du Maroc: diversité, répartition biogéographique et problèmes posés par leur aménagement. Forêt Méditerranéenne. VII: 53-67.
  6. BURBAN, C. and PETIT, R. J. (2003): Phylogeography of maritimepine inferred with organelle markers having contrasted inheritance. Molecular Ecology 12: 1487-1495.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01817.x12755877
  7. BOUDY P. (1951): Economie Forestière Nord-Africaine, description forestière du Maroc, tome troisième, Edit. F. Moncho, pp. 249.
  8. CARRIÓN, J. S., NAVARRO, C., NAVARRO, J. and MUNUERA, M. (2000): The distribution of cluster pine (Pinus pinaster) in Spain as derived from palaeoecological data: relationships with phytosociological classification. The Holocene 10: 243-252.10.1191/095968300676937462
  9. CAUVIN, B., MARIEN, J. N. and EL-YOUSFO, S. M. (1997): Protection, conservation et gestion des ressources génétiques forestiers au Maroc. Ann. Rech. For. Maroc. 178-195.
  10. CHELIAK, W. M. and PITEL, J. A. (1984): Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. Petawawa Nat. For. Inst., Can. For. Serv. Agric., Canada.
  11. CONKLE, M. T., HODGSKISS, P. D., NUNNALLY, L. B. and HUNTER, S. C. (1982): Starch gel electrophoresis of conifer seeds: a laboratory manual. USDA-Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW- 64, 18 pp.10.2737/PSW-GTR-64
  12. DESTREMAU, D. X., JOLLY, H. and THARI, T. (1976): Contribution à la connaissance des provenances de Pinus pinaster. Ann. Rech. For. Maroc. 16: 101-153.
  13. DUREL, C. E., BERTIN, P. and KREMER, A. (1996): Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficent in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 347-356.10.1007/BF0022367824166256
  14. EL-ALAMI, S. L., SBAY, H., PETIT, R. J. and OUASSON, A. (1997): Contribution à l’étude de la variabilité de six provenances marocaines de Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Pp. 56-62. In: Actes du séminaire sur l’amélioration, la conservation et l’utilisation des ressources génétiques forestières marocaines. ENFI Salé, Maroc.
  15. FALLOUR, D., FADY, B. and LEFÈVRE, F. (1997): Study on isoenzyme variation in Pinus pinea L.: Evidence for low polymorphism. Silvae Genetica 46: 201-207.
  16. FAO (1993): Programme d’action forestier méditerranéen: Cadre de référence des plans d’action forestiers nationaux des pays méditerranéennes. Committee on Mediterranean Forestry Questions, Sylva Mediterranea, Rome, 81 pp.
  17. GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ, S. C., AGÚNDEZ, D., ALÍA, R., SALVADOR, L. and GIL, L. (2001): Geographical variation of gene diversity of Pinus pinaster Ait in the Iberian Peninsula. Pp. 161-171. In: SCHUBERT, R. and MÜLLER-STARCK, G. (eds.). Genetic response of forest systems to changing environmental conditions.10.1007/978-94-015-9839-2_14
  18. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
  19. GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ, S. C., MARIETTE, S., RIBEIRO, M. M., BURBAN, C., RAFFIN, A., CHAMBEL, M. R., RIBEIRO, C. A. M., AGUIAR, A., PLOMION, C., ALÍA, R., GIL, L., VENDRAMIN, G. G. and KREMER, A. (2004): Genetic resources in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation and differentiation among maternal lineages. Forest Ecology and Management (in press).10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.008
  20. GOTTLIEB, L. D. (1981): Electrophoresis evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7: 1-46.
  21. HAMRICK, J. L. and GODT, M. J. (1990): Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pp. 43-63. In: BROWN, A. H. D., CLEGG, M. T., KAHLER, A. L. and WEIR, B. S. (eds). Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources. Sinauer, Sunderland. Mass.
  22. HAMRICK, J. L., LINHART, Y. B. and MITTON, J. B. (1979): Relationship between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 173-200.
  23. HAMRICK, J. L., GODT, M. J. and SHERMAN-BROYLES, S. L. (1992): Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6: 95-124.10.1007/BF00120641
  24. HARFOUCHE, A., BARADAT, P. and KREMER, A. (1995): Variabilité intraspécifique chez le pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.) dans le sud-est de la France. I. Variabilité des populations autochtones et de l’ensemble de l’aire de l’espèce. Ann. Sci. For. 52: 307-328.10.1051/forest:19950402
  25. HARFOUCHE, A., BAHRMAN, N., BARADAT, P., GUYON, J. P., PETIT, J. R. and KREMER, A. (2000): Provenance hybridization in a diallel mating scheme of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). II. Heterosis. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 10-16.
  26. HULME, M. (1999): Global Warming. Progress in Physical Geography 23: 303-311.10.1177/030913339902300208
  27. HURLBERT, S. H. (1971): The non concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577-586.10.2307/193414528973811
  28. KEPHART, S. R. (1990): Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes: a comparative analysis of techniques. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 693-712.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb14456.x
  29. LAMY, S., BOUCHARD, A. and SIMON, J. P. (1999): Genetic structure, variability and mating system in eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis) populations of recent origin in an agricultural landscape in southern Québec. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1383-1392.
  30. LEDIG, F. T. and CONKLE, M. T. (1983): Gene diversity and genetic structure in a narrow endemic, Torrey pine. Evolution 37: 79-85.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05515.x28568032
  31. LEWIS, P. O., ZAYKIN, D. (2001): Genetic Data Analysis: Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Data, Version 1.0 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from: http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html.
  32. LOVELESS, M. D. and HAMRICK, J. L. (1984): Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65-95.
  33. M’HIRIT, O. (1999): Mediterranean forest: ecological space and economic and community wealth. Unasylva 197: 3-15.
  34. M’HIRIT, O. and MAGHNOUJ, M. (1994): Stratégie de conservation des ressources génétiques forestières au Maroc. Pp 123- 138 in: Les ressources phytogénétiques et développement durable. Actes Editions, Rabat, Maroc.
  35. M’HIRIT, O., SBAY, H., EL-ALAMI, S. L. and KERROUANI, H. (1997): Bilan de la recherche en matière de génétique forestière au Maroc. Pp. 1-29. In: Actes du séminaire sur l’amélioration, la conservation et l’utilisation des ressources génétiques forestières marocaines. ENFI Salé, Maroc.
  36. MÜLLER-STARCK, G., BARADAT, P. and BERGMANN, F. (1992): Genetic variation within European tree species. New Forest 6: 23-47.10.1007/BF00120638
  37. NEI, M. (1973): Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321-3323.10.1073/pnas.70.12.33214272284519626
  38. NEI, M., MARUYAMA, T. and CHAKRABORTY, R. (1975): The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1-10.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x28563291
  39. NEVO, E. (1978): Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory. Theor. Pop. Biol. 13: 123-177.
  40. NGUYEN-QUEYRENS, A., DERRE, N., LAMANT, A. and SEILLAC, P. (1995): Tolérance au chlorure de sodium et sélectivité Na/K chez trois races géographiques de Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Ann. Sci. For. 52: 465-475.10.1051/forest:19950506
  41. PETIT, R. J., BAHRMAN, N. and BARADAT, P. (1995): Comparison of genetic differentiation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) estimated using isozyme, total protein and terpenic loci. Heredity 75: 382-389.10.1038/hdy.1995.150
  42. PETIT, R. J., EL-MOUSADIK, A. and PONS, O. (1998): Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12: 844-855.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96489.x
  43. RAFFIN, A. (1999): Pin maritime. Pp. 50-51. In: TESSIER DU CROSS, E. (ed.). Conserver les ressources génétiques forestières en France. MAP-BRG, Commission des Ressources Génétiques Forestières, INRA-DIC, Paris.
  44. RAYMOND, M. and ROUSSET, F. (1995): GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573
  45. RIBEIRO, M. M., PLOMION, C., PETIT, R. J., VENDRAMIN, G. G. and SZMIDT, A. C. (2001): Variation in chloroplast single-sequence repeats in Portuguese maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 97-103.10.1007/s001220051623
  46. ROGERS, D. L. and LEDIG, F. T. (eds.) (1996): The status of temperateNorth American Forest Genetic Resources. Report 16. University of California, Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Davis, California.
  47. ROTHE, G. M. (1994): Electrophoresis for enzymes: laboratorymethods. Springer Verlag, Bertin-Heidelberg, 307 pp. 10.1007/978-3-642-79069-0
  48. SALVADOR, L., ALÍA, R., AGÚNDEZ, D. and GIL, L. (2000): Genetic variation and migration pathways of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in the Iberian Peninsula. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 89-95.10.1007/s001220050013
  49. SAVOLAINEN, O. (2000): Guidelines for gene conservation basedon population genetics. Pp. 100-109. In: KRISHNAPILLAY, B. et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the XXI IUFRO World Congress, Malaysian XXI IUFRO World Congress Organising Committee, Malaysia.
  50. SKOURI, M. (1994): Les dégradations du milieu et les mesures de protection. CR Acad. Agri. Fran. 80: 49-82.
  51. TOMASELLI, R. (1976): La dégradation du maquis méditerranéen. Pp. 34-75. In: Forêts et maquis méditerranéens: écologie, conservation et aménagements. Note Technique MAB 2. UNESCO, Paris.
  52. TREMBLAY, M. and SIMON, J. P. (1989): Genetic structure of populations of White spruce (Picea glauca) at its northern limit of distribution in nouveau-Québec. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1371-1379.
  53. WEIR, B. S. (1990): Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. YEH, F. C. and LAYTON, C. (1979): The organization of genetic variability in central and marginal population of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21: 487-503.
  54. YEH, F. C., YANG, R.-C., BOYLE, T., YE, Z.-H. and MAO, J. X. (1997): POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada.10.1023/A:1005764702510
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2004-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 99
Submitted on: Dec 16, 2003
Published on: Oct 27, 2017
Published by: Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 N. Wahid, S. C. González-Martínez, I. El Hadrami, A. Boulli, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.