Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Measuring e-Government Maturity: A meta-synthesis approach Cover

Measuring e-Government Maturity: A meta-synthesis approach

SEEU Review
Volume 11 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
By: Agron Chaushi,  Blerta Abazi Chaushi and  Florije Ismaili  
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. 1. Alabau Muñoz, A. (2004). La Unión Europea y su política para el desarrollo de la administración electrónica: tras los objetivos de la Estrategia de Lisboa. Madrid: Fundación Vodafone España.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Alhomod, S. M., & Shafi, M. M. (2012). Best Practices in E government: A review of Some Innovative Models Proposed in Different Countries. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences, 12(1), 1–6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Almazan, R. S., & Gil-García, J. R. (2008). E-Government portals in Mexico.10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch131
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236–248. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Baum, C., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. Gartner Group.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on e-government adoption. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 2(1), 11–20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Chandler, S., & Emanuels, S. (2002). Transformation not automation. In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on E-government (pp. 91–102).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Chen, J., Yan, Y., & Mingins, C. (2011). A Three-Dimensional Model for E-Government Development with Cases in China’s Regional E-Government Practice and Experience. In Management of e-Commerce and e-Government (ICMeCG), 2011 Fifth International Conference on (pp. 113–120). IEEE.10.1109/ICMeCG.2011.49
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Davies, P. (2008). e-Government Best Practices learning from success, avoiding the pitfalls.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Callaghan, R., & Yared, H. (2002). Government on the Web II. National Audit Office. Retrieved from http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2002/04/0102764.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 589–611.10.1108/14637150510619902
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). eGovernment Maturity Models: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 5(3).
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Hiller, J. S., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-Government, 200, 162–198.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Howard, M. (2001). E-government across the globe: how will“ e” change government? Government Finance Review, 17(4), 6–9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Jayashree, S., & Marthandan, G. (2010). Government to E-government to E-society. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(19), 2205–2210. http://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.2205.2210
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553–560.10.1177/104973239600600407
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Jorgensen, D. J., & Cable, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of e-government: A case study of the city of Corpus Christi, Texas. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 67(3), 15–21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Kim, D.-Y., & Grant, G. (2010). E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 12(3), 230–244.10.1108/13287261011070858
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503.10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220–230.10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Lee, S. M., Tan, X., & Trimi, S. (2005). Current Practices of Leading e-Government Countries. Commun. ACM, 48(10), 99–104. http://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089112
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Löfstedt, U. (2008). E-services for and by citizens: towards e-participation and social systems design for development of local public e-services. Departement of Information Technology and Media, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Maranny, E. A. (2011). Stage Maturity Model of m-Government (SMM m-Gov): Improving e-Government performance by utilizing m-Government features. University of Twente. Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/62691/
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Moon, M. J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.10.1111/0033-3352.00196
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris, France: OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Palvia, S. C. J., & Sharma, S. S. (2007). E-government and e-governance: definitions/domain framework and status around the world. In International Conference on E-governance.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64.10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Rohleder, S. J., & Jupp, V. (2003). e-government Leadership: Engaging the customer. Online Accenture.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Ronaghan, S. A. (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. New York: United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration. Retrieved from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/English.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Sandieson, R. (2006). Pathfinding in the research forest: The pearl harvesting method for effective information retrieval. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 401–409.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Sandieson, R. W., Kirkpatrick, L. C., Sandieson, R. M., & Zimmerman, W. (2010). Harnessing the power of education research databases with the pearl-harvesting methodological framework for information retrieval. The Journal of Special Education, 44(3), 161–175.10.1177/0022466909349144
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Shahkooh, K. A., Saghafi, F., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). A proposed model for e-Government maturity. In Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, 2008. ICTTA 2008. 3rd International Conference on (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models–a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443–458.10.1108/02635570510592352
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. United Nations, & Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2012). United Nations e-government survey 2012 e-government for the people. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf.10.18356/b1052762-en
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. United Nations E-Government Development Database. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/egovernment_overview/ereadiness.htm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Valdés, G., Solar, M., Astudillo, H., Iribarren, M., Concha, G., & Visconti, M. (2011). Conception, development and implementation of an e-Government maturity model in public agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 176–187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Wescott, C. G. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian Journal of Political Science, 9(2), 1–24.10.1080/02185370108434189
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Windley, P. J. (2002). eGovernment maturity. USA: Windleys’ Technolometria, Available: Http://www.Windley.com/docs/eGovernment%20Maturity.Pdf. Retrieved from http://new.windley.com/docs/eGovernment%20Maturity.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. World Bank: e-Government. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://go.worldbank.org/6WT3UPVG80
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/seeur-2015-0028 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8462
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 67
Published on: Apr 4, 2016
Published by: South East European University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
e-government,
digital government,
e-government maturity model,
meta-synthesis
Related subjects:
General interest

© 2016 Agron Chaushi, Blerta Abazi Chaushi, Florije Ismaili, published by South East European University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)Next article