Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Right To Property: From Magna Carta To The European Convention On Human Rights Cover

Right To Property: From Magna Carta To The European Convention On Human Rights

By: Jelena Ristik  
Open Access
|Jan 2016

References

  1. Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, OUP Oxford, 201010.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207992.001.0001
  2. Chapman, Audrey R., A Human Rights Perspective on Intellectual Property, Scientific Progress, and Access to the Benefits of Science, WIPO Publication No.762(I), Geneva, 1999
  3. Coban, Ali Riza, Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention of Human Rights, Ashgate Publishing, 2004
  4. Cullet, Philippe, Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection in the TRIPS Era, The John Hopkins University Press, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 29, No.2, 200710.1353/hrq.2007.0014
  5. Griffits, Johnatan and McDough, Luke, Constructing European Intellectual Property, Achievements and New Perspectives, Edvard Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham & Edvard Elgar Publishing Inc, Northampton, 2013
  6. Grgic, Aida, Mataga, Zvonimir, Longar, Matija and Vilfan, Ana, The Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols, Council of Europe, 2007
  7. Helfer, Laurence R., The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 49, 2008
  8. O’Neill, Johnathan, Property Rights and the American Founding: An Overview, Supreme Court Historical Society, Volume 38, Issue 3, 201310.1111/j.1540-5818.2013.12021.x
  9. Rathbone, Mark, The Human Rights Act: a Magna Carta for the Twenty-First Century?, Political Studies Association, 2014
  10. Renucci, Jean-François, Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights The rights guaranteed and the protection mechanism, Council of Europe, 2005
  11. Santos, Ana Eduarda, Reballancing Intellectual Property in the Information Society: The Human Rights Approach, Duke Law School, 2013
  12. Schmidtz, David, The Institution of Property, Social Philosophy and Policy, No.11, 199410.1017/S0265052500004428
  13. Siegan, Bernard H., Property Rights: From Magna Carta to the Fourteenth Amendment, Transaction Publishers, 2001
  14. Спировски, Игор, Јуриспруденцијата на Европскиот суд за човекови права (збирка на пресуди), 2-ри Август С, Штип, 2007
  15. Welkowitz, David S., Privatizing Human Rights? Creating Intellectual Property Rights from Human Rights Principles, New York University, Volume 43, No.3, Article 3, 2013
  16. Wilson, Tim, Property Rights are Human Rights, IPA Review, Volume 67, No.I, Article 2, 2015
  17. Magna Carta, Runnymede, 15.6.1215
  18. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No.11 and No.14, Rome, 4.11.1950
  19. Cases of the European Commission of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights:
  20. Akkus v. Turkey, July 9, 1997, Reports 1997-IV
  21. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 44 Eur. H.R. Rep. 42 [846], 855-56 (Chamber 2007) (judgement of Oct. 11, 2005)
  22. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 45 Eur. H.R. Rep. 36 [830], (Grand Chamber 2007)
  23. Aral v. Turkey, App.No.24563/94 (1998) (admissibility decision)
  24. Dima v. Romania, App.No.58472/00, para 87 (2005) (admissibility decision)
  25. Draon v. France, App.No.1513/13, 42 Eur.H.R. Rep.40 [807], 832-33 (2006) (judgement of Oct.6, 2005)
  26. Fedorenko v. Ukraine, App.No.25921/02, 29 (2006)
  27. Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, February 20, 2003, App.No. 46316/99
  28. Jahn v. Germany, App.No.46720/99, 42 Eur.H.R.Rep.49 [1085], 1105 (Grand Chamber 2006) (judgement of June 30, 2005)
  29. Lenzing AG v. United Kingdom, App.No.38817/97, 94-A Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep.136 (1998)
  30. Melnychuk v. Ukraine, App.No.28743, para.8 (2005) (admissibility decision)
  31. Motais de Narbonne v. France, July 2, 2002, App.No. 48161/99
  32. Smith Kline & French Lab. Ltd v. Netherlands, App.No.12633/87, 66 Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep. 70, 79 (1990) (admissibility decision)
  33. Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, September 23, 1982, A 52, § 63
  34. Tre Traktorer AB v. Sweden, July 7, 1989, A 159, § 53
  35. Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, June 26, 1986, A 10110.1007/978-1-4612-4830-9_24
  36. Wiggins v. the United Kingdom, EC, February 8, 1978, DR 13/40
  37. Zhigalev v. Russia, App.No.54891/00, 131 (2006)
  38. Zubani v. Italy, August 7,1996, Reports 1996-IV
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 158
Published on: Jan 13, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2016 Jelena Ristik, published by South East European University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.