Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relevance Of Magna Carta To Rights Of Victims Of Abuse Of Power Cover

Relevance Of Magna Carta To Rights Of Victims Of Abuse Of Power

SEEU Review
Volume 11 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2016
References

References

  1. Калајџиев, Г., & Лажетиќ-Бужаровска, Г. (2011).Скопје: Академик.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aitken, R., & Aitken, M. (2009). Magna Carta.(3), 59-62.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2013).Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bachrach, M. (2000). The Protection and Rights of Victims under International Criminal Law.(1), 7-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bacik, I., Maunsell, C., & Gogan, S.Dublin, 1998: Dublin Rape Crisis Centre.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Beccaria, C. ((1784)1987).New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Breay, C., & Harrison, J. (2015).London: The British Library.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, D. (2015).New York: Penguin Classics.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, M. (1988). Pain, Suffering, and Jury Awards: A Study of the Cost of Crime to Victims.(3), 537-556.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Doak, J. (2008).Portland: Hart Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, I. (2004). An Ambiguous Participant: The Crime Victim and Criminal Justice Decision-Making.(6), 967-982.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Frehsee, D. (1999). Restitution and Offender-Victim Arrangement in German Criminal Law: Development and Theoretical Implications., 235-259.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Goldstein, A., & Marcus, M. (1977). The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three “Inquisitorial” Systems: France, Italy And Germany., 240-283.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Gray, A. (2015). The Right to Confrontation in Common Law Systems: A Critical Comparison.(1), 129-165.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Hazeltine, H. (1917). The Influence of Magna Carta on American Constitutional Development.(1), 1-33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Helmholz, R. (1999). Magna Carta and the ius commune.(2), 297-371.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Jurow, K. (1975). Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law.(4), 265-279.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Kirchengast, T. (2013). Victim Lawyers, Victim Advocates, and the Adversarial Criminal Trial.(4), 568-594.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. McGehee, L. P. (1906). The History and Scope of the Constitutional Guaranty of Due Process of Law. In L. P. McGehee,(pp. 1-48). Long Island: Eduard Thomson Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. McIlwain, C. (1914). Due Process of Law in Magna Carta.(1), 25-51.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. McNally, L. (2011, October 13).Retrieved December 2, 2015, from MagnaCarta800th:
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Merryman, J. (1987). Civil Law Tradition.(2), 438-441.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Mill, J. S. ((1859) 2002).Dover Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Moohr, G. S. (2004). Prosecutorial Power in an Adversarial System: Lessons from Current White Collar Cases and the Inquisitorial Model., 165-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Moriarty, L. (2005). Victim Participation at Parole Hearings: Balancing Victim, Offender and Public Interest.(2), 385-390.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Naidu, M. (2003). Magna Carta for a Global Community?(2), 1-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. O'Reilly, G. (1994). England Limits the Right to Silence and Moves Towards and Inquisitorial System of Justice.(2), 402-452.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Orth, J. (2003).Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Osman v. UK, 29 EHRR 245 (European Court of Human Rights 2000).
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Perez v. France, 40 EHRR 39 (European Court of Human Rights 2005).
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Rousseau, J.-J. ((1762)1968).New York: Penguin Classics.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Saxe, D. (2010). Teaching Magna Carta in American History: Land, Law, and Legacy.(3), 329-344.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Schunemann, B. (1999). The Role of the Victim Within the Criminal Justice System: A Three-Tiered Concept., 33-49.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Sebba, L. (1982). The Victim's Role in the Penal Process: A Theoretical Orientation.(2), 217-240.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Shapland, J. (1984). Victims, the Criminal Justice System and Compensation.(2), 131-149.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, H. (1915). Due Process of Law.(5), 353-369.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. The British Library Board. (2007).London: The British Library.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. United Nations. (1985, November 29).Retrieved December 3, 2015, from United Nations:
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Waller, I. (2015, April 2).Retrieved December 5, 2015, from Irvin Waller Blog:
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Williams, R. (2010). The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause.(3), 408-512.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Zappalt, S. (2010). The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused., 137-164.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/seeur-2015-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8462 (formerly 1409-7001) | Journal ISSN: 1409-7001
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 58
Published on: Jan 13, 2016
Published by: South East European University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
General interest

© 2016 Besa Arifi, published by South East European University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 11 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article