References
- Калајџиев, Г., & Лажетиќ-Бужаровска, Г. (2011). Закон за кривичната постапка. Скопје: Академик.
- Aitken, R., & Aitken, M. (2009). Magna Carta. Litigation, 35 (3), 59-62.
- Aristotle. (2013). Politics (reprint). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Bachrach, M. (2000). The Protection and Rights of Victims under International Criminal Law. The International Lawyer, 34 (1), 7-20.
- Bacik, I., Maunsell, C., & Gogan, S. The Legal Process and Victims of Rape. Dublin, 1998: Dublin Rape Crisis Centre.
- Beccaria, C. ((1784)1987). On Crimes and Punishments. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Breay, C., & Harrison, J. (2015). Magna Carta - Law, Liberty, Legacy. London: The British Library.
- Carpenter, D. (2015). Magna Carta. New York: Penguin Classics.
- Cohen, M. (1988). Pain, Suffering, and Jury Awards: A Study of the Cost of Crime to Victims. Law & Society Review, 22 (3), 537-556.10.2307/3053629
- Doak, J. (2008). Victims' Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice - Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Edwards, I. (2004). An Ambiguous Participant: The Crime Victim and Criminal Justice Decision-Making. The British Journal of Criminology, 44 (6), 967-982.10.1093/bjc/azh050
- Frehsee, D. (1999). Restitution and Offender-Victim Arrangement in German Criminal Law: Development and Theoretical Implications. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3, 235-259.10.1525/nclr.1999.3.1.235
- Goldstein, A., & Marcus, M. (1977). The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three “Inquisitorial” Systems: France, Italy And Germany. The Yale Law Journal, 87, 240-283.10.2307/795651
- Gray, A. (2015). The Right to Confrontation in Common Law Systems: A Critical Comparison. New Criminal Law Review, 18 (1), 129-165.10.1525/nclr.2015.18.1.129
- Hazeltine, H. (1917). The Influence of Magna Carta on American Constitutional Development. Columbia Law Review, 17 (1), 1-33.10.2307/1110845
- Helmholz, R. (1999). Magna Carta and the ius commune. The University of Chicago Law Review, 66 (2), 297-371.10.2307/1600469
- Jurow, K. (1975). Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law. The American Journal of Legal History, 19 (4), 265-279.10.2307/845053
- Kirchengast, T. (2013). Victim Lawyers, Victim Advocates, and the Adversarial Criminal Trial. New Criminal Law Review, 16 (4), 568-594.10.1525/nclr.2013.16.4.568
- McGehee, L. P. (1906). The History and Scope of the Constitutional Guaranty of Due Process of Law. In L. P. McGehee, Due Process of Law under the Constitution (pp. 1-48). Long Island: Eduard Thomson Company.
- McIlwain, C. (1914). Due Process of Law in Magna Carta. Columbia Law Review, 14 (1), 25-51.10.2307/1111001
- McNally, L. (2011, October 13). Relevance of Magna Carta to Human Rights in the 21st Century. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from MagnaCarta800th: http://magnacarta800th.com/speeches/relevance-of-magna-carta-to-human-rights-in-the-21st-century/
- Merryman, J. (1987). Civil Law Tradition. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 35 (2), 438-441.10.2307/840406
- Mill, J. S. ((1859) 2002). On Liberty. Dover Publications.
- Moohr, G. S. (2004). Prosecutorial Power in an Adversarial System: Lessons from Current White Collar Cases and the Inquisitorial Model. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 8, 165-220.10.1525/nclr.2004.8.1.165
- Moriarty, L. (2005). Victim Participation at Parole Hearings: Balancing Victim, Offender and Public Interest. Criminology and Public Policy Journal, 4 (2), 385-390.10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00027.x
- Naidu, M. (2003). Magna Carta for a Global Community? Peace Research, 35 (2), 1-10.
- O'Reilly, G. (1994). England Limits the Right to Silence and Moves Towards and Inquisitorial System of Justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85 (2), 402-452.10.2307/1144105
- Orth, J. (2003). Due Process of Law - A Biref History. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
- Osman v. UK, 29 EHRR 245 (European Court of Human Rights 2000).
- Perez v. France, 40 EHRR 39 (European Court of Human Rights 2005).
- Rousseau, J.-J. ((1762)1968). The Social Contract (Reprint). New York: Penguin Classics.
- Saxe, D. (2010). Teaching Magna Carta in American History: Land, Law, and Legacy. The History Teacher, 43 (3), 329-344.
- Schunemann, B. (1999). The Role of the Victim Within the Criminal Justice System: A Three-Tiered Concept. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3, 33-49.10.1525/nclr.1999.3.1.33
- Sebba, L. (1982). The Victim's Role in the Penal Process: A Theoretical Orientation. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 30 (2), 217-240.10.2307/839627
- Shapland, J. (1984). Victims, the Criminal Justice System and Compensation. The British Journal of Criminology, 24 (2), 131-149.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047436
- Taylor, H. (1915). Due Process of Law. The Yale Law Journal, 24 (5), 353-369.10.2307/787076
- The British Library Board. (2007). Treasures in Focus: Magna Carta. London: The British Library.
- United Nations. (1985, November 29). Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from United Nations: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/40/a40r034.htm
- Waller, I. (2015, April 2). Major UN Crime Congress to Celebrate and Advance Magna Carta for Victim Rights. Retrieved December 5, 2015, from Irvin Waller Blog: http://irvinwaller.org/crime-victims-rights/2015/04/02/2231/
- Williams, R. (2010). The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause. The Yale Law Journal, 120 (3), 408-512.
- Zappalt, S. (2010). The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8, 137-164.10.1093/jicj/mqq001