References
- Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
- Axelrod, R. M. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press.
- Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.
- Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287-298.
- Bloodgood, J. M., & Chae, B. (2010). Organizational paradoxes: Dynamic shifting and integrative management. Management Decision, 48(1), 85-104.
- Bodwell, W., & Chermack, T. J. (2010). Organizational ambidexterity: Integrating deliberate and emergent strategy with scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193-202.
- Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55(5), 483-503.
- De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy synthesis: Resolving strategy paradoxes to create competitive advantage: Text and readings. Cengage Learning EMEA.
- De Vries, M. F. K. (2003). Organizational paradoxes: Clinical approaches to management (Vol. 4). Psychology Press.
- Di Clemente, R., Chiarotti, G. L., Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., & Pietronero, L. (2014). Diversification versus specialization in complex ecosystems. PloS one, 9(11), e112525.
- Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1, 167-188.
- Fuglsang, M. (1999). The sexy biotechnology: a postmodern phenomenological observation of contradiction and meaning. In Modern Organizations and Emerging Conundrums: Exploring the Postindustrial Subculture of the Third Millenium (pp. 83-90). Lexington Books US.
- Gorzeń-Mitka, I., Okręglicka, M. (2014). Managing Complexity: A Discussion of Current Strategies and Approaches, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 27, pp. 438-444.
- Guilmot, N., & Ehnert, I. (2015). 27 years of research on organizational paradox and coping strategies: A review. In XXIVe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique.
- Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
- Jorde, T. M., & Teece, D. J. (1989). Competition and cooperation: Striking the right balance. California Management Review, 31(3), 25-37.
- Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
- Kwon, D., Watts-Sussman, S., & Collopy, F. (2002). Value frame, paradox and change: the constructive nature of information technology business value. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, 2(4), 196-220.
- Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776.
- Luscher, L. S., Lewis, M., & Ingram, A. (2006). The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 491-502.
- Martini, A., Neirotti, P., & Aloini, D. (2015). Finding the way to ambidexterity: Exploring the relationships among organisational design, knowledge creation and innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(04), 1550045.
- Mouzas, S. (2006). Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59(10), 1124-1132.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
- O Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-83.
- Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562-578.
- Reeves, M., Haanæs, K., Hollingsworth, J., Scognamiglio Pasini, F. (2013). Ambidexterity: The Art of Thriving in Complex Environments. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/.
- Rodgers, C. (2007). Embracing paradox. In Informal coalitions (pp. 195-225). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Rothaermel, F.T. (2015). Strategic Management. Mc Graw-Hill Higher Education.
- Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS publications.
- Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
- Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. Pearson Education.
- Thompson, J. L. (1998). Competence and strategic paradox. Management Decision, 36(4), 274-284.
- Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459-1477.
- Yeung, D., Pellizzari, P., Bird, R., & Abidin, S. (2012). Diversification versus Concentration… and the Winner is? (No. 18). http://mc-3501-10896029.ap-southeast-1.elb.amazonaws.com/sites/default/files/wp18.pdf.
- *** http://www.businessdictionay.com/definition/paradox.html.