References
- Balzarova, M. A., and Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development.,(2), 265-279.
- Baron, D. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy,, vol. 10, no. 1, 7-45.
- Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate performance., 4, 497–505.
- Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2007). A critical look on quality through CSR lenses: Key challenges stemming from the development of ISO 26000.,(7), 738-752.
- Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains - On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard.,(2), 274-286.
- Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). Social responsibility standardization: Guidance or reinforcement through certification?.,(3), 231-242.
- Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions,, vol. 15, no. 1, 1-13.
- Donaldson, L., and Davis, J.H. (1991), Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns,, vol. 16 no. 1 49-64.
- Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications,Vol. 20, No. 1, 65-91.
- Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits Milton TheSeptember 13, pp. 32-33, 122, 126.
- Hahn, R. (2013). ISO 26000 and the standardization of strategic management processes for sustainability and corporate social responsibility.,(7), 442-455.
- Hahn, R., and Weidtmann, C. (2016). Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000 Analyzing the Case of a Global Multistakeholder Process.,(1), 90-129.
- Harrison, J.S., and Freeman, R.E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives,Vol. 42, No. 5, 479-485.
- Helms, W. S., Oliver, C., & Webb, K. (2012). Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility.,(5), 1120-1145.
- Husted, B.W. and de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance,, 43:1.
- Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics,20, 2404-2437.
- McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective., 26, 117–27.
- McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, (Guest Editors Introduction), 43:1, 1-18.
- McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D. and Cory, K. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: an extension of the resource-based theory., 39, 707–23.
- Pojasek, R.B. (2011). ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility.20.3 (2011): 85-93.
- Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2009). ISO-lating’corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: a dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000.,(5), 289-299.
- Unruh et al. (2016).. Research Report, MIT Sloan Management Review and BCG.
- Waldman, D., Siegel, D. and Javidan, M. (2004). CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 79
Published on: Jun 29, 2016
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2016 Mihaela Herciu, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.