Pike Esox Lucius Distribution and Feeding Comparisons in Natural and Historically Channelized River Sections
By: Kaspars Ivanovs
References
- [1] Vorosmarty C. J., McIntyre P. B., Gessner M. O., Dudgeon D., Prusevich A., Green P., Glidden S., et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010:467:555–561.
- [2] Lepori F., Palm D., Brannas E., Malmqvist B. Does restoration of structuralheterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol.Appl. 2005:15:2060–2071.
- [3] Trigal C., Degerman E. Multiple factors and thresholds explaining fish species distributions in lowland streams. Global Ecology and Conservation 2015:4:589–601. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.009
- [4] Bolonina A., Comoglio C., Calles O., Kunickis M. Strategies for Mitigating the Impact of Hydropower Plants on the Stocks of Diadromous Species in the Daugava River. Energy Procedia 2016:95:81–88. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.027
- [5] Simpson P. W., Newman J. R., Keirn M. A., Matter R. M., Guthrie P. A. Manual of Stream Channelization Impacts on Fish and Wildlife. Washington, DC: Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982.
- [6] Lewczuk K. G., Burandt P. Effect of river straightening on the hydrochemical properties of floodplain lakes: Observations from the Łyna and Drweca Rivers, N Poland. Ecological Engineering 2011:37:786–795. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.028
- [7] Ormerod S. J. Current issues with fish and fisheries: editor's overview and introduction. J. Appl. Ecol. 2003:40:204–213. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00824.x
- [8] Schinegger R., Palt M., Segurado P., Schmutz S. Untangling the effects of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in European running waters. Science of the Total Environment 2016:573:1079–1088. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.143
- [9] Birzaks J. Latvijas upju zivju sabiedrības un to noteicosie faktori. PhD thesis, Riga, 2013.
- [10] Thompson L., Larsen R. Fish Habitat in Freshwater Streams. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of California, 2004.
- [11] Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Upju baseinu apgabalu apsaimniekosanas plani un pludu riska parvaldibas plani. [10.04.2016.] Available: http://www.meteo.lv/lapas/vide/udens/udens-apsaimniekosana-/upju-baseinu-apsaimniekosanas-plani-/upju-baseinu-apsaimniekosanas-plani?id=1107&nid=424
- [12] Kobler A., Klefoth T., Wolter C., Fredrich F., Arlinghaus R. Contrasting pike (Esox lucius L.) movement and habitat choice between summer and winter in a small lake. Hydrobiologia 2008:601:17–27. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9263-2
- [13] Harvey B. 2009. A biologicalsynopsis of northern pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Manuscript Reports of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2009:2885:31.
- [14] Winfield I. J., Fletcher J. M., James J. B. Long-term changes in the diet of pike (Esox lucius), the top aquatic predator in a changing Windermere. Freshwater Biology 2012:57(2):373–383. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02607.x
- [15] Mann R. H. K. 1996. Fisheries and economics. Pike: Biology and Exploitation. Fish and Fisheries Series 19. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8775-4_9
- [16] Wetzel G. R. Limnology. Lake and Rivers ecosystems. Third edition. London: Academic press, 2001.
- [17] Svanback R, Bolnick D. I. Intraespecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2007:274:39–44. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0198
- [18] Sandlund O. T., Museth J., Oistad S. Migration, growth patterns, and diet of pike (Esox lucius) in a river reservoir and its inflowing river. Fisheries Research 2016:173:53–60. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.010
- [19] Craig J. F. A short review of pike ecology. Hydrobiologia 2008:601:5–16. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9262-3
- [20] GIS Latvija 1:500000. LU GZZF WMS. [06.10.2015.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lv
- [21] Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health, and Environment “BIOR” Fish Resources Research Department unpublished data.
- [22] Kottelat M., Freyhof J. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Cornol: Publications Kottelat, 2007.
- [23] Nilsson A. Aquatic Insects of North Europe. A Taxonomic Handbook. CD-Rom edition, 2005.
- [24] Hyslop E. J. Stomach contents analysis—A review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 1980:17:411–429. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.x
- [25] Addinsoft, 2016. XLSTAT, Data and statistical analysis with MS Excel. Addinsoft, USA. [05.04.2016.] Available: https://www.xlstat.com/en/
- [26] ORTOFOTO 5. LGIA Latvijas 5. etapa ortofoto karsu mozaika meroga 1:10 000. LU GZZF WMS. [12.04.2016.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lv
- [27] Upju baseini 1970tie. LPSR Upju baseinu karsu mozaika meroga 1:100 000. LU GZZF WMS. [12.03.2016.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lv
- [28] VSIA. Zemkopibas ministrijas nekustamie ipasumi. Melioracijas digitalais kadastrs. [15.04.2016.] Available: http://www.melioracija.lv/
- [29] VSIA. Zemkopības ministrijas nekustamie ipasumi. unpublished data.
- [30] Raat A. J. P. Synopsis of biological data on northen pike (Esox lucius). FAO Fisheries Department, 1988.
- [31] Inskip P. D. Habitat suitability index models: northern pike. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982.
- [32] Dominguez J., Pena J. C. 2000: Spatio-temporal variation in the diet of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) in a colonized area (Esla Basin, NW Spain). Limnetica 2000:19:1–20.
- [33] Alp A., Yegen V., Apaydin Yagci M., Uysal R., Biçen E., Yagci A. Diet composition and prey selection of the pike, Esox lucius, in Çivril Lake, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 2008:24:670–677.
- [34] Soupir C. A., Brown M. L., Kallemeyn L. W. Trophic ecology of largemouth bass and northern pike in allopatric and sympatric assemblages in northern boreal lakes. Can. J. Zool. 2000:78:1759–1766. doi:10.1139/z00-126
- [35] Lorenzoni M. Corboli M. Dorr A. J. M., Giovinazzo G., Selvi S., Mearelli M. Diets of Micropterus salmoides Lac. And Esoxlucius L. in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy) and their diet overlap. Bull. Francais Peche Piscicult. 2002:365/366:537–547. doi:10.1051/kmae:2002050
- [36] Elvira B., Nicola G. G., Almodovar A. Pike and red swamp crayfish: a new case on predator – prey relationship between aliens in central Spain. J. Fish Biol. 1996:48:437–446. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01438.x
- [37] Mero T. O. 2014. Diet in pike (Esox lucius) in northwestern Vojvodina (Serbia). Nat. Croat. 2014:23(1):27–34.
- [38] Simaika J. P., Stoll S., Lorenz A. W., Thomas G., Sundermann A., Haase P. 2015. Bundles of stream restoration measures and their effects on fish communities. Limnologica 2015:55:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2015.10.001
- [39] Eklov P. Effects of habitat complexity and prey abundance on the spatial and temporal distributions of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1997:54:1520–1531. doi:10.1139/f97-059
- [40] Fieseler C., Wolter C. A fish-based typology os small temparate rivers in the north-eastern lowlands of Germany. Limnologica 2006:36:2–16. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2005.10.001
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 41
Published on: Jan 27, 2017
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2017 Kaspars Ivanovs, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.